Closed whedon closed 4 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Reference check summary:
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d19-1670 may be missing for title: EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Tasks
- https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020108 may be missing for title: fastai: A Layered API for Deep Learning
- https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/d14-1162 may be missing for title: GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon invite @oliviaguest as editor
@oliviaguest has been invited to edit this submission.
Hi @oliviaguest, can you handle this one?
@kyleniemeyer I can indeed!
@deniederhut can you suggest some reviewers please? 😄
Also @deniederhut is this a library for dealing with linguistic data or data in general? I am skimming and it looks like specifically for corpora of text but I am struggling to see it explicitly stated in the docs https://niacin.readthedocs.io/en/latest/? I might be missing something though, either way, please feel free (if you think it's useful) to link me to the right place so I can read more.
@whedon assign @oliviaguest as editor
OK, the editor is @oliviaguest
😅 the intention was to also include algorithms for image data and timeseries, but I haven't had a chance to write any of that. Right now it is just text augmentation.
As for reviewers, I might suggest the following:
😅 the intention was to also include algorithms for image data and timeseries, but I haven't had a chance to write any of that. Right now it is just text augmentation.
Thanks for clarifying @deniederhut. Can you make some edits to make this current state and plan clear, please?
@deniederhut ☝️
Hey! I modified the titles of both the paper and the README last week per your request - you can see the changes here.
The body of the paper already stated this focus explicitly:
Here, we introduce niacin, a python library for performing a large set of commonly-used text transformations
Were there further changes you would like to see?
Thank you! No changes for now — this is perfect. 😊
@whedon add @BayesforDays as reviewer
OK, @BayesforDays is now a reviewer
@whedon add @sara-02 as reviewer
OK, @sara-02 is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2136.
✨ @deniederhut, @sara-02, and @BayesForDays: Please go to https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2136 where the review will actually take place! 😊
Submitting author: @deniederhut (Dillon Niederhut) Repository: https://github.com/deniederhut/niacin Version: 0.2.0 Editor: @oliviaguest Reviewers: @BayesforDays, @sara-02 Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @deniederhut. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@deniederhut if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: