Closed whedon closed 4 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Reference check summary:
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3575 may be missing for title: Systems genetics approaches to understand complex traits
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon check repository
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=34.10 s (126.4 files/s, 56961.0 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON 352 118 0 552238
Python 2491 155080 199581 548569
PO File 1109 71710 9717 216767
JavaScript 97 20453 29412 85504
CSS 47 2503 644 15088
HTML 94 2139 228 14902
C/C++ Header 26 936 1338 5865
reStructuredText 29 1680 501 3978
SQL 3 0 0 1103
C 3 102 92 1091
Fortran 90 15 69 35 252
SVG 25 0 0 129
Markdown 3 35 0 114
TeX 4 1 16 55
Fish Shell 1 16 13 47
XML 5 1 1 44
INI 2 5 0 27
YAML 1 0 0 18
C Shell 1 12 7 17
Fortran 77 2 1 1 14
Bourne Again Shell 1 1 0 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 4311 254862 241586 1445831
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@lpantano @will-rowe @csoneson @lorenanicole could on of you edit this submission?
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=36.05 s (119.5 files/s, 53873.2 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON 352 118 0 552238
Python 2491 155080 199581 548569
PO File 1109 71710 9717 216767
JavaScript 97 20453 29412 85504
CSS 47 2503 644 15088
HTML 94 2139 228 14902
C/C++ Header 26 936 1338 5865
reStructuredText 29 1680 501 3978
SQL 3 0 0 1103
C 3 102 92 1091
Fortran 90 15 69 35 252
SVG 25 0 0 129
Markdown 3 35 0 114
TeX 4 1 16 55
Fish Shell 1 16 13 47
XML 5 1 1 44
INI 2 5 0 27
C Shell 1 12 7 17
Fortran 77 2 1 1 14
Bourne Again Shell 1 1 0 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 4310 254862 241586 1445813
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '2144' was gathered on 2020/03/04.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
MetabolomicsAustrali 5 60 109381 8.84
shushu-leng 27 1128299 677 91.16
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
MetabolomicsAustrali 57 95.0 1.0 8.77
shushu-leng 1075686 95.3 10.8 11.49
@lpantano @will-rowe @csoneson @lorenanicole could on of you edit this submission?
I can take this one
@whedon assign @csoneson as editor
OK, the editor is @csoneson
👋 @MetabolomicsAustralia-Bioinformatics - I'll handle your submission, and start by looking for suitable reviewers.
Looking at your submission, I noticed that your paper is a bit too short for JOSS standards (see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain). Could you add a bit more context?
👋 @bovee, @lgatto, @jorainer - would (two of) you be willing to review this submission for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
MASTR-Quant: An Open-Source Web-based Software Tool for the Quantitive Analysis of Mass Spectrometry-based Data
software: https://github.com/MetabolomicsAustralia-Bioinformatics/metabio accompanying paper: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.02144/joss.02144/10.21105.joss.02144.pdf
instructions on reviewing for JOSS: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
ping @bovee, @lgatto, @jorainer
👋 @bovee, @lgatto, @jorainer - would (two of) you be willing to review this submission for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
MASTR-Quant: An Open-Source Web-based Software Tool for the Quantitive Analysis of Mass Spectrometry-based Data
software: https://github.com/MetabolomicsAustralia-Bioinformatics/metabio accompanying paper: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.02144/joss.02144/10.21105.joss.02144.pdf
instructions on reviewing for JOSS: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
Here are my comments regarding this submission:
mastr-quant.bio21.unimelb.edu.au
, which contains some basic documentation of how to use the web interface. I tried it twice but the application froze and became unresponsive. The web application contains test data for user to try the interface out, but there is no description of these test data.uncle-leng/metabio
. There are only two contributors to either of the fork or original repository. It would be useful to document the contributions of the 9 authors.I confirm that I have read the JOSS conflict of interest policy and that I have no COIs with reviewing this work.
Thanks @lgatto (that was super fast 😃)! Once one more reviewer confirms their interest, I will close this issue and open the actual review issue that contains the checklist for each reviewer. I will then transfer your comments above over there so that we have everything in one place.
Dear @csoneson - I'm quite busy at present with other reviews - so I would only want to accept to review yet another one when it's absolutely necessary. Would be happy if another reviewer would accept to review...
@jorainer - no problem! If you happen to have a suggestion for someone that I might reach out to, that would be awesome :)
@sgibb eventually - but I'm not sure if he's available.
@sgibb - would you be interested in reviewing this submission for the Journal of Open Source Software?
MASTR-Quant: An Open-Source Web-based Software Tool for the Quantitive Analysis of Mass Spectrometry-based Data
software: https://github.com/MetabolomicsAustralia-Bioinformatics/metabio accompanying paper: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.02144/joss.02144/10.21105.joss.02144.pdf
instructions on reviewing for JOSS: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
@csoneson I am sorry but I am currently not able to review anything.
Dear authors and reviewers
We wanted to notify you that in light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS has decided to suspend submission of new manuscripts and to handle existing manuscripts (such as this one) on a "best efforts basis". We understand that you may need to attend to more pressing issues than completing a review or updating a repository in response to a review. If this is the case, a quick note indicating that you need to put a "pause" on your involvement with a review would be appreciated but is not required.
Thanks in advance for your understanding.
Arfon Smith, Editor in Chief, on behalf of the JOSS editorial team.
@csoneson Sorry about the delay! I'm a little stretched right now, but happy to review.
@bovee - brilliant, thanks so much! I'll add you too as a reviewer and open the actual review issue.
@whedon assign @lgatto as reviewer
OK, @lgatto is now a reviewer
@whedon add @bovee as reviewer
OK, @bovee is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2163.
Hi all,
Thanks for your time and effort in reviewing so far. Only about manuscript submission:
Just to address the manuscript issues, any advice to get around these technical issues would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks and regards, Don Teng Bioinformatician Metabolomics Australia University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria On 11 Mar 2020, 8:23 AM +1100, Laurent Gatto notifications@github.com, wrote:
Here are my comments regarding this submission:
• The submission contains a repository (but see below) and a valid OSI approved license. • I find the manuscript to be extremely short. In particular, I miss some citation/comparison with existing alternatives in general, and a description of this software compares to other commonly-used packages in this research area. • There are no references. • The documentation on the README page only contains installation instructions (which I have not tested). There is no information about the underlying implementations or core functionality. In particular, it seems the user is let to decide what regression type and parameters are best suited based on visual inspection of the fit, being also allowed to manually define outliers. More rigorous approaches such (standardised) residuals, leverage and/or Cook's distance might be applicable. • The application is available at mastr-quant.bio21.unimelb.edu.au, which contains some basic documentation of how to use the web interface. I tried it twice but the application froze and became unresponsive. The web application contains test data for user to try the interface out, but there is no description of these test data. • I managed to download result files, which seem to contain various forms of the data (raw, normalised, ...), at time poorly formatted (multiple table per sheet) and I could find any documentation describing the output file or how to use the results for downstream analyses. • It is confusion that the repo to be reviewed is itself a for of uncle-leng/metabio. There are only two contributors to either of the fork or original repository. It would be useful to document the contributions of the 9 authors.
I confirm that I have read the JOSS conflict of interest policy and that I have no COIs with reviewing this work. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Submitting author: @MetabolomicsAustralia-Bioinformatics (Vinod Narayana) Repository: https://github.com/MetabolomicsAustralia-Bioinformatics/metabio Version: 1.0 Editor: @csoneson Reviewers: @lgatto, @bovee Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @MetabolomicsAustralia-Bioinformatics. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@MetabolomicsAustralia-Bioinformatics if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: