openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: GridTest: testing and metrics collection for Python #2192

Closed whedon closed 4 years ago

whedon commented 4 years ago

Submitting author: @vsoch (Vanessa Sochat) Repository: https://github.com/vsoch/gridtest Version: 0.0.14 Editor: @usethedata Reviewers: @cbrueffer, @khinsen Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @vsoch. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@vsoch if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 4 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
whedon commented 4 years ago
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.96 s (216.7 files/s, 50680.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            45           4950             44           9134
JavaScript                      14           2237           2256           8541
Markdown                        45           1469              0           6321
Python                          47           1116           1376           3074
SVG                              7              0              0           2691
JSON                             6              0              0           1750
CSS                              6            317            288           1699
YAML                            26             64             35            635
make                             1             30              5            190
reStructuredText                 7             79            132             90
Bourne Shell                     3             15             11             64
TeX                              1              2              0             22
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           208          10279           4147          34211
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository '2192' was gathered on 2020/05/21.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Vanessasaurus                    6          1489            379            8.67
vsoch                           52         18888            794           91.33

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Vanessasaurus              1269           85.2          0.1               12.61
vsoch                     17935           95.0          0.5               17.12
whedon commented 4 years ago
Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
whedon commented 4 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

arfon commented 4 years ago

:wave: @usethedata - this looks like it could be a good fit for you. I'll go ahead and assign this to you now - please let me know if this is a problem.

arfon commented 4 years ago

@whedon assign @usethedata as editor

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, the editor is @usethedata

vsoch commented 4 years ago

Thank you @whedon, @arfon, and @usethedata! Since this is a Python-based tool that is generally usable across domains, I'll suggest reviewers that are keen on Python. I'll also try to choose reviewers that aren't currently reviewing, and haven't reviewed recently to help balance the work.

Let me know if you want others, or otherwise different.

usethedata commented 4 years ago

@vsoch -- Thank you.

@khninsen and @cbrueffer -- Would you be willing to review this paper for the Journal of Open Source Software? I realize this would be a first review and I'm happy to help walk through that process. When I have at least one (and preferably the needed two) reviewers, I will open up a review issue that will have a checklist for each reviewer and some additional instructions. My email is in my GitHub profile if you'd like to discuss off-line.

vsoch commented 4 years ago

@khinsen see above!

cbrueffer commented 4 years ago

Hi everyone,

looks interesting; happy to review, but I won't have time to work on this for the next ~two weeks. If that's alright, please sign me up.

usethedata commented 4 years ago

@cbrueffer When do you think you would be able to work on this?

cbrueffer commented 4 years ago

I can commit to it from about June 13.

vsoch commented 4 years ago

That's definitely okay with me!

usethedata commented 4 years ago

@whedon assign @cbrueffer as reviewer

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, @cbrueffer is now a reviewer

usethedata commented 4 years ago

@khinsen 👋 Pinging on this issue. Are you able to review this paper for JOSS?

khinsen commented 4 years ago

@usethedata Yes, I can review this submission. Sorry for not reacting earlier, but GitHub notified me only today of being mentioned in this thread.

usethedata commented 4 years ago

@whedon add @khinsen as reviewer

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, @khinsen is now a reviewer

usethedata commented 4 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2284.