[PRE REVIEW]: Vizumap: an R package for visualising uncertainty in spatial data

whedon commented 4 years ago

Submitting author: @lydialucchesi (Lydia Lucchesi) Repository: https://github.com/lydialucchesi/Vizumap Version: v1.2.0 Editor: @bstabler Reviewers: @nuest, @mikejohnson51 Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @lydialucchesi. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@lydialucchesi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

whedon commented 4 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

whedon commented 4 years ago

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.06 s (700.7 files/s, 44038.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               35            356            731            876
Markdown                         2             52              0            119
Rmd                              2             90            151            103
TeX                              1              2              0             34
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            40            500            882           1132
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository '2298' was gathered on 2020/06/07.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Kuhnert, Petra (Data             2           186            186           50.00
Lucchesi, Lydia (Uni             1             0            186           25.00
Petra_Kuhnert                    1           186              0           25.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments

whedon commented 4 years ago

Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.1002/sta4.150 is OK
- 10.1071/MF17237 is OK
- 10.1214/16-AOAS950 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

whedon commented 4 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

kyleniemeyer commented 4 years ago

👋 @lydialucchesi - Thanks for your submission to JOSS. As described in our blog post announcing the reopening of JOSS, we're currently working in a "reduced service mode", limiting the number of papers assigned to any individual editor.

Since reopening JOSS we've had > 60 papers submitted and as such, yours has been put in our backlog that we will be working through over the coming weeks and months.

Thanks in advance for your patience!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 4 years ago

@kbarnhart @leouieda could one of you handle this submission? Thanks

kbarnhart commented 4 years ago

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman I can't take on another paper right now. If no one can take this on between now the end of next week. I should be able to take on another one or two papers then.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 4 years ago

Thanks @kbarnhart understood, that is fine. @leouieda would you be able to take on this one?

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 4 years ago

@whedon invite @leouieda as editor

whedon commented 4 years ago

@leouieda has been invited to edit this submission.

arfon commented 4 years ago

@whedon invite @bstabler as editor

This also might be a good submission for @bstabler to get started with.

whedon commented 4 years ago

@bstabler has been invited to edit this submission.

leouieda commented 4 years ago

Sorry for the delay. Just in case @bstabler isn’t available, I would be happy to be a back up editor.

bstabler commented 4 years ago

happy to @kyleniemeyer

bstabler commented 4 years ago

@whedon add me as editor

whedon commented 4 years ago

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands

bstabler commented 4 years ago

@whedon assign me as editor

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, the editor is @bstabler

bstabler commented 4 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 4 years ago

It looks like you don't have an editor and reviewer assigned yet so I can't start the review. Try one or more of these commands:

# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor

# Assign a GitHub user as the sole reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer

# Add a GitHub user to the reviewers of this submission
@whedon add @username as reviewer

bstabler commented 4 years ago

@whedon assign @bstabler as reviewer

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, @bstabler is now a reviewer

bstabler commented 4 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2409.

bstabler commented 4 years ago

Hi @leouieda, I assigned myself as editor and reviewer, which I understand is not preferred. Would you be interested in being reviewer or editor and then I'll do the other assignment? I've read the paper, run the software, and looked through the code so I'm fine doing either. Thanks.

bstabler commented 4 years ago

@nuest, @giskid, @potterzot would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html.

bstabler commented 4 years ago

and @jsta, @sjsrey, @mikejohnson51, @jayrobwilliams, @mikerspencer, @GISerDaiShaoqing, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html.

mikejohnson51 commented 4 years ago

@bstabler Sure! This looks like a great package.

nuest commented 4 years ago

@bstabler Yes :-)

bstabler commented 4 years ago

thanks @mikejohnson51, @nuest. I'll assign you as reviewers. @leouieda - I'll go ahead and be the editor. This is my first editor role so any advice is much appreciated. Thanks.

bstabler commented 4 years ago

@whedon assign @mikejohnson51 as reviewer

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, @mikejohnson51 is now a reviewer

bstabler commented 4 years ago

@whedon assign @nuest as reviewer

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, @nuest is now a reviewer

bstabler commented 4 years ago

@whedon add @mikejohnson51 as reviewer

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, @mikejohnson51 is now a reviewer

bstabler commented 4 years ago

@whedon remove @bstabler as reviewer

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, @bstabler is no longer a reviewer

danielskatz commented 4 years ago

@bstabler - FYI, once you've started a review, nothing you do in this pre-review issue will matter, so there's no need to do anything more here. And I think you know this now, but just in case not, in the pre-review issue: 1 - become the editor: @whedon assign me as editor 2 - find reviewers 3 - assign first reviewer: @whedon assign @reviewer1 as reviewer 4 - assign next reviewer: @whedon add @reviewerer2 as reviewer 5 - repeat 4 if needed 6 - start the review: @whedon start review (which closes the pre-review issue)

See https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/editing.html#pre-review for more official text...

sjsrey commented 4 years ago

sorry but i'm on family vacation for a bit and can't take this one on. Sergio (Serge) Rey Founding Director, Center for Geospatial Sciences Professor, School of Public Policy University of California, Riverside sergio.rey@ucr.edu

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:12 PM Ben Stabler notifications@github.com wrote:

and @jsta https://github.com/jsta, @sjsrey https://github.com/sjsrey, @mikejohnson51 https://github.com/mikejohnson51, @jayrobwilliams https://github.com/jayrobwilliams, @mikerspencer https://github.com/mikerspencer, @GISerDaiShaoqing https://github.com/GISerDaiShaoqing, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2298#issuecomment-651564609, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA42GQHPLBA7SNMTMCVQ6TRZF633ANCNFSM4NXRS7FQ .

GISerDaiShaoqing commented 4 years ago

I'm delighted to receive the invitation to review. But I'm a little busy this month, I'm sorry that I may not have more time to review.

Shaoqing Dai Ph.D. Candidate Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation(ITC), University of Twente, the Netherlands Hengelosestraat 99, 7500AE Enschede，the Netherlands Tel：18850440994 E-mail ：dsq1993qingge@163.com, daishaoqing16@mails.ucas.ac.cn, s.dai@utwente.nl Homepage: http://gisersqdai.top/mycv/

yeelauren commented 4 years ago

I do not have time this month for a review, but this package looks really interesting!

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:02 PM DaiShaoqing notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm delighted to receive the invitation to review. But I'm a little busy this month, I'm sorry that I may not have more time to review.

Shaoqing Dai Ph.D. Candidate Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation(ITC), University of Twente, the Netherlands Hengelosestraat 99, 7500AE Enschede，the Netherlands Tel：18850440994 E-mail ：dsq1993qingge@163.com, daishaoqing16@mails.ucas.ac.cn, s.dai@utwente.nl Homepage: http://gisersqdai.top/mycv/

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2298#issuecomment-652619066, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC4Q4AXCSAWGEGZXQ6RPSDDRZOI3RANCNFSM4NXRS7FQ .

-- Lauren Yee http://thespatiallab.org/ MSc. Geography University of Waterloo and Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo, ON

openjournals / joss-reviews

[PRE REVIEW]: Vizumap: an R package for visualising uncertainty in spatial data #2298

I'm delighted to receive the invitation to review. But I'm a little busy this month, I'm sorry that I may not have more time to review.