[PRE REVIEW]: CRED-nf online checklist: An R Shiny tool to facilitate completion of the Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf) checklist

[whedon]

Submitting author: @hugaped (Hugo Pedder) Repository: https://github.com/hugaped/CRED-nf Version: v0.1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewer: Pending Managing EiC: Lorena A Barba

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @hugaped. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@hugaped if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.03 s (417.0 files/s, 35564.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                                5             65             19            489
JSON                             5             10              0            311
Rmd                              1             32             50            103
Markdown                         2             30              0             63
TeX                              1              1              0             21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            14            138             69            987
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository '2337' was gathered on 2020/06/14.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.1093/brain/awaa009 is OK
- 10.1159/000371714 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[hugaped]

@whedon generate pdf

From: whedon notifications@github.com Sent: 14 June 2020 13:35 To: openjournals/joss-reviews joss-reviews@noreply.github.com Cc: Hugo Pedder hugo.pedder@bristol.ac.uk; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: CRED-nf online checklist: An R Shiny tool to facilitate completion of the Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf) checklist (...

Hello human, I'm @whedonhttps://github.com/whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog posthttps://blog.joss.theoj.org/2020/05/reopening-joss.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2337#issuecomment-643760741, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHWHNATPE2TCPANN2QTCFKDRWS7VXANCNFSM4N5N2JJA.

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[arfon]

@hugaped - many thanks for your submission to JOSS. After consulting with the JOSS editorial team, we have deemed that this submission is out of scope and does not meet our submission requirements. Specifically, while this package looks useful, it fails into out 'minor utility' category.

Thanks again for your interest in JOSS.

[arfon]

@whedon reject

[whedon]

Paper rejected.