openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
722 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: tacost: Testing and simulating the performance of acoustic tracking systems #2501

Closed whedon closed 4 years ago

whedon commented 4 years ago

Submitting author: @thejasvibr (Beleyur Thejasvi) Repository: https://github.com/thejasvibr/tacost Version: v0.1.35 Editor: Pending Reviewer: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @thejasvibr. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@thejasvibr if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 4 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
whedon commented 4 years ago

PDF failed to compile for issue #2501 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

whedon commented 4 years ago
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.25 s (127.2 files/s, 84030.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                             1            615              4          15543
Python                          18            312            322            719
TeX                              1             29              0            213
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0           2760            196
reStructuredText                 3             76             28            129
Markdown                         2             33              0             90
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
YAML                             4              0              0             12
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            32           1077           3122          16937
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository '2501' was gathered on 2020/07/22.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
tbeleyur                        16          2391           1070           98.41
unknown                          1            44             12            1.59

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
tbeleyur                   1309           54.7          1.9                9.40
unknown                      44          100.0          0.0                4.55
whedon commented 4 years ago
Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/s00265-017-2398-x is OK
- 10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.046 is OK
- 10.1111/1365-2435.13073 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005412 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001745 is OK
- 10.1121/1.424536 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3518761 is OK
- 10.1242/jeb.081398 is OK
- 10.1098/rspb.2008.1505 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0162069 is OK
- 10.1002/ece3.6216 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01993.x is OK
- 10.1098/rspb.2003.2487 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2017.p0213 may be missing for title: HARKBird: Exploring acoustic interactions in bird communities using a microphone array
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.416105 may be missing for title: Acoustical flight path tracking of echolocating bats
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428329 may be missing for title: Sperm whale clicks: Directionality and source level revisited

INVALID DOIs

- 10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683221. is INVALID
thejasvibr commented 4 years ago

@whedon commands

whedon commented 4 years ago

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository
thejasvibr commented 4 years ago

potential reviewers: krystophny, pharshalp, dbuscombe-usgs

thejasvibr commented 4 years ago

@whedon generate pdf

whedon commented 4 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

thejasvibr commented 4 years ago

@whedon article proof is okay

whedon commented 4 years ago

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands
kthyng commented 4 years ago

Hi @thejasvibr. Thank you for your submission. However, while your software does indeed look useful research software, the JOSS editorial board has determined that it does not meet the bar of substantial scholarly effort.

If you continue to develop this work, we would be happy to reconsider it as a submission in the future.

kthyng commented 4 years ago

@whedon reject

whedon commented 4 years ago

Paper rejected.