[PRE REVIEW]: qualR: An R package to download Sao Paulo air pollution data

[whedon]

Submitting author: @quishqa (Mario Eduardo Gavidia Calderón) Repository: https://github.com/quishqa/qualR/ Version: v0.9.0 Editor: Pending Reviewer: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @quishqa. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @KristinaRiemer.

@quishqa if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.06 s (250.8 files/s, 18435.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                         3            104              0            307
R                                9             64            148            209
TeX                              1              9              0            108
Rmd                              1             21             28             31
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            14            198            176            655
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository '2525' was gathered on 2020/07/27.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.051 is OK
- 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.008 is OK
- 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.026 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-11-2209-2018 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-5721 may be missing for title: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[kthyng]

@whedon query scope

[whedon]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[quishqa]

@whedon commands

El lun., 27 de jul. de 2020 a la(s) 12:33, whedon (notifications@github.com) escribió:

Submitting author: @quishqa https://github.com/quishqa (Mario Eduardo Gavidia Calderón http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7371-1116) Repository: https://github.com/quishqa/qualR/ https://github.com/quishqa/qualR/ Version: v0.9.0 Editor: Pending Reviewer: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post https://blog.joss.theoj.org/2020/05/reopening-joss.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @quishqa https://github.com/quishqa. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @KristinaRiemer https://github.com/KristinaRiemer.

@quishqa https://github.com/quishqa if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon https://github.com/whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon https://github.com/whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2525, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADMC7SPZOIXFN2DNYVXOGI3R5WM4FANCNFSM4PI4M7QA .

-- Mario Gavidia Calderón *Engenheiro *ambiental e Doutorando em Meteorologia

Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas Universidade de São Paulo Rua do Matao Matão, 1226 - Sala 308 Cidade Universitária São Paulo,SP,Brasil CEP:05508-090

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

[quishqa]

After checking the list of potential reviewers I would like to suggest jaeyk and dwinter

[danielskatz]

@quishqa - after some editor discussion, we have decided that this submission is not a large enough contribution for JOSS to review it - see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#substantial-scholarly-effort. We encourage you to consider JOSS at a later time if more effort and code goes into this software, or alternatively, consider publishing the software to Zenodo to get a DOI that users can cite.

[danielskatz]

@whedon reject

[whedon]

Paper rejected.