Closed whedon closed 4 years ago
Slight adjustment to the acknowledgments since we're postponing Morphometer to a separate paper. Proof looks good :-)
We're thinking of 'Irreducible Minkowski Tensors' (IMTs for short) as a proper name, which is why we titlecased it. If that is not possible for some reason, we prefer titlecasing the whole title, i.e. "papaya2: 2D Irreducible Minkowski Tensor Computation".
If IMT is in the paper also then of course it's fine. Now "irreducible" is not capitalised in the paper! I'm good with anything, as long as consistent.
@whedon check references
@hugoledoux Good point. I've fixed capitalization the paper!
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss. Reticulating splines etc...
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@whedon check references from branch joss
Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss
@whedon check references from branch joss
Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss
@whedon check references from branch joss
Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/12/P12015 is OK
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2010/11/p11010 is OK
- 10.1063/1.4774084 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-51951-7_13 is OK
- 10.1002/adma.201100562 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03331.x is OK
- 10.1209/0295-5075/90/34001 is OK
- 10.1209/0295-5075/111/24002 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20010604 is OK
- 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00328-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.029 is OK
- 10.1209/0295-5075/128/60001 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-648x/aa57c7 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/009 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@hugoledoux - looks to be fixed now. Sorry for the noise debugging this.
@arfon cheers. All were good!
@skapfer one last thing needs to be done, you have a release but no version
I guess it means updating the zenodo too, so please send me back the DOI if modified. Once this is done, we will formally accept it and your paper should be publish within a few days.
Good point, the publication is a good point to start semantic versioning. I've tagged v1.0.0 and updated the Zenodo record. The DOI didn't change.
@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.4071543 as archive
OK. 10.5281/zenodo.4071543 is the archive.
@whedon set v1.0.0 as version
OK. v1.0.0 is the version.
@whedon accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
PDF failed to compile for issue #2538 with the following error:
Can't find any papers to compile :-(
@skapfer the editor-in-chief will now process/finalise the paper. And it should be published pretty soon.
@whedon accept from branch joss
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/12/P12015 is OK
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2010/11/p11010 is OK
- 10.1063/1.4774084 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-51951-7_13 is OK
- 10.1002/adma.201100562 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03331.x is OK
- 10.1209/0295-5075/90/34001 is OK
- 10.1209/0295-5075/111/24002 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20010604 is OK
- 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00328-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.029 is OK
- 10.1209/0295-5075/128/60001 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-648x/aa57c7 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/009 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/joss-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1802
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1802, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true from branch joss
@skapfer - please spell out A&A in the references
@arfon - is this waiting for anything else?
@whedon check references from branch joss
Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/12/P12015 is OK
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2010/11/p11010 is OK
- 10.1063/1.4774084 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-51951-7_13 is OK
- 10.1002/adma.201100562 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03331.x is OK
- 10.1209/0295-5075/90/34001 is OK
- 10.1209/0295-5075/111/24002 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20010604 is OK
- 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00328-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.029 is OK
- 10.1209/0295-5075/128/60001 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-648x/aa57c7 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/009 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss. Reticulating splines etc...
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@danielskatz Fixed!
@arfon - is this waiting for anything else?
Nope, good to go as far as I'm concerned.
@whedon accept deposit=true from branch joss
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
Congratulations to @skapfer (Sebastian Kapfer) and co-authors!!
Thanks to @kenohori and @rmjarvis for reviewing! And @hugoledoux for editing!
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.02538/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02538)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02538">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.02538/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.02538/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02538
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Submitting author: @skapfer (Sebastian Kapfer) Repository: https://github.com/morphometry/papaya2 Version: v1.0.0 Editor: @hugoledoux Reviewers: @kenohori, @rmjarvis Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.4071543
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@kenohori, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @hugoledoux know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Review checklist for @kenohori
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @rmjarvis
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper