Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1086/521806 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17731.x is OK
- 10.1086/423025 is OK
- 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.04999.x is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.131301 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063538 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/staa1131 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.121301 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/staa2797 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv571 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@whedon accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1086/521806 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17731.x is OK
- 10.1086/423025 is OK
- 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.04999.x is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.131301 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063538 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/staa1131 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.121301 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/staa2797 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv571 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/joss-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1834
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1834, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true
Hi @steven-murray, I am the EIC on duty this week, doing some final checks before publishing.
I noticed that in the paper, journal names are not appearing for your references. Can you replace all the macros in your .bib file (e.g., \apj
) with the spelled-out journal names?
Thanks @kyleniemeyer . This is done now and in master.
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@whedon accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1086/521806 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17731.x is OK
- 10.1086/423025 is OK
- 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.04999.x is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.131301 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063538 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/staa1131 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.121301 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/staa2797 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv571 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/joss-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1840
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1840, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true
@whedon accept deposit=true
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
Congrats @steven-murray on your article's publication in JOSS!
Many thanks to @sambit-giri and @sultan-hassan for reviewing this, and @dfm for editing.
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.02582/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02582)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02582">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.02582/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.02582/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02582
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Thanks @dfm , @sultan-hassan, @sambit-giri and @kyleniemeyer!
Submitting author: @steven-murray (Steven Murray) Repository: https://github.com/21cmFAST/21cmFAST Version: v3.0.3 Editor: @dfm Reviewer: @sambit-giri, @sultan-hassan Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.4107189
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@sambit-giri & @sultanier, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @dfm know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Review checklist for @sambit-giri
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @sultan-hassan
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper