[PRE REVIEW]: Moran Pycess: a Python package to simulate Moran processes driven by game theory

[whedon]

Submitting author: @AngryMaciek (Maciej Bak) Repository: https://github.com/AngryMaciek/angry-moran-simulator Version: v1.0.0 Editor: @majensen Reviewers: @xin-huang, @tkchafin Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AngryMaciek. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@AngryMaciek if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[arfon]

@whedon check repository

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.17 s (131.2 files/s, 34496.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          10            303            486           2428
SVG                              1              0              0            778
Markdown                         7            148              0            451
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0            712            384
YAML                             3             12             29             55
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            22            463           1227           4096
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository '2613' was gathered on 2020/08/30.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Maciej Bak                      79          4508           1291          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Maciek Bąk                 3217          100.0          0.2               15.11

[arfon]

@whedon generate pdf from branch paper

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch paper. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[kthyng]

@majensen Are you able to and interested in taking this submission on? I see you already have a number of submissions you are handling, but it also looks like a good fit for you.

[kthyng]

@whedon invite @majensen as editor

[whedon]

@majensen has been invited to edit this submission.

[majensen]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @majensen

[majensen]

Thanks @kthyng - looks interesting. Moran models take me back to my misspent youth.

[majensen]

@AngryMaciek - thanks for this interesting submission. Do you happen to have any suggestions for reviewers? There is a long list of people who have agreed to review that you can consider. Much appreciated.

[majensen]

@spond - it has been a long time! Would you be willing to perform a software review of this work for the Journal of Open Source Software? All reviews are performed openly and online in GitHub; an overview of the expectations are here.

It would be great to have your popgen expertise on this work. If you have any suggestions for others, that would be great too. Please reply in this issue thread. Thanks for your consideration -- @majensen

[majensen]

@RHagenson - reaching out to see if you would have time and interest in reviewing this work for JOSS. Thanks for your consideration!

[AngryMaciek]

@majensen Thanks for the editorial effort you put in. I am not from the field of population biology (unlike the second author, who is the brain behind this operation) so unfortunately, I do not have any suggestions... @rozmanowna - could you please take a look at the list of potential reviewers?

[rozmanowna]

Thank you @majensen! Based on the list, I would also suggest @xin-huang, @dwinter and @tkchafin for potential reviewers.

[xin-huang]

I am happy to review.

[tkchafin]

Also happy to review if needed - Tyler

[majensen]

@xin-huang and @tkchafin Thanks very much for stepping up -- I agree with @rozmanowna that you both would bring excellent experience to this review. Please refresh your memories regarding the review process. I will assign you as reviewers and then begin the review. The review proper will take place in a separate GitHub issue. Much apppreciated!

[majensen]

@spond, @rhagenson - we have found reviewers for this work. Thanks for your consideration. --@majensen

[majensen]

@whedon assign @xin-huang as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @xin-huang is now a reviewer

[majensen]

@whedon add @tkchafin as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @tkchafin is now a reviewer

[majensen]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2643.

[majensen]

@xin-huang @tkchafin @AngryMaciek (and @rozmanowna ) , the review will proceed over in #2643 -- thanks!