Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Failed to discover a Statement of need
section in paper
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=0.72 s (400.0 files/s, 141844.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fortran 90 278 10052 29918 59981
Markdown 4 78 0 503
C 3 153 152 468
TeX 1 52 16 361
make 1 3 26 18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 287 10338 30112 61331
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '2626' was gathered on 2020/09/01.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Florian Faucher 2 773 0 100.00
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Florian Faucher 773 100.0 0.0 19.79
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1190/geo2019-0251.1 is OK
- 10.1093/gji/ggaa009 is OK
- 10.1051/m2an/2019009 is OK
- 10.1051/m2an/2019088 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.05.011 is OK
- 10.1137/15M1043856 is OK
- 10.1190/segam2016-13961828.1 is OK
- 10.1190/geo2019-0527.1 is OK
- 10.1137/S0036142901384162 is OK
- 10.1137/070706616 is OK
- 10.1007/s10915-011-9501-7 is OK
- 10.1137/S0895479899358194 is OK
- 10.1016/j.parco.2005.07.004 is OK
- 10.1007/b98874 is OK
- 10.1190/1.3238367 is OK
- 10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00498.x is OK
- 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00967.x is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1190/geo2019-0251.1 may be a valid DOI for title: A priori estimates of attraction basins for velocity model reconstruction by time-harmonic Full Waveform Inversion and Data Space Reflectivity formulation
- 10.1142/7486 may be a valid DOI for title: Waves and rays in elastic continua
INVALID DOIs
- 10.1088/1361-6420 is INVALID
Hi @meg-simula could you take on this submission?
@whedon invite @meg-simula as editor
@meg-simula has been invited to edit this submission.
@whedon assign @meg-simula as editor
OK, the editor is @meg-simula
@flofaucher Thanks for your submission to JOSS. This looks exciting, but before I reach out to reviewers, would you take another look at the JOSS stipulations regarding paper scope (in particular length):
https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain
This paper looks substantially longer than 250-1000 words.
@meg-simula Thank you, I must apologize it is indeed much more... Regarding the modifications, should I simply update a new (shorter) version of the paper directly, or should I submit as a new paper in JOSS? I thank you for your time.
Thanks - I suggest you update this submission with a revised version of the paper. Perhaps some of the material to be cut could be included in the documentation instead?
Ok, I have updated the repository with a new version which is less than 1000 words (excluding the bibliography). Indeed, most of the details are already in the documentation. Yet I wanted to keep the pictures which, I hope, improve the readability.
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@whedon check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1190/geo2019-0251.1 is OK
- 10.1093/gji/ggaa009 is OK
- 10.1051/m2an/2019009 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6420/ab3507 is OK
- 10.1051/m2an/2019088 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.05.011 is OK
- 10.1137/15M1043856 is OK
- 10.1190/segam2016-13961828.1 is OK
- 10.1190/geo2019-0527.1 is OK
- 10.1137/S0036142901384162 is OK
- 10.1137/070706616 is OK
- 10.1007/s10915-011-9501-7 is OK
- 10.1137/S0895479899358194 is OK
- 10.1016/j.parco.2005.07.004 is OK
- 10.1007/b98874 is OK
- 10.1190/1.3238367 is OK
- 10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00498.x is OK
- 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00967.x is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113406 may be a valid DOI for title: Adjoint-state method for Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin discretization: application to the inverse acoustic wave problem
- 10.1190/geo2019-0251.1 may be a valid DOI for title: A priori estimates of attraction basins for velocity model reconstruction by time-harmonic Full Waveform Inversion and Data Space Reflectivity formulation
- 10.1142/7486 may be a valid DOI for title: Waves and rays in elastic continua
INVALID DOIs
- None
Hi @mikaem @chennachaos @yangbai90 @capitalaslash, would two of you like to review this submission for JOSS?
Feel free to take a look at our reviewer guidelines here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
Hi @meg-simula. Thank you for the opportunity! I am happy to review this. :)
Great @chennachaos, thanks! Just awaiting one more then...
@whedon assign @chennachaos as reviewer
OK, @chennachaos is now a reviewer
Hi @meg-simula , I'm very happy to be the reviewer.
Great, thanks @yangbai90!
@whedon add @yangbai90 as reviewer
OK, @yangbai90 is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2699.
Submitting author: @flofaucher (Florian Faucher) Repository: https://gitlab.com/ffaucher/hawen Version: v0.1.2 Editor: @meg-simula Reviewers: @chennachaos, @yangbai90 Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @flofaucher. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @jedbrown.
@flofaucher if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: