openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: J3D: using moments to quantify the shape of molecular clouds in 3D #2627

Closed whedon closed 4 years ago

whedon commented 4 years ago

Submitting author: @SJaffa (Sarah Jaffa) Repository: https://github.com/SJaffa/Jplots Version: v1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewer: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @SJaffa. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @dfm.

@SJaffa if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 4 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
whedon commented 4 years ago

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

whedon commented 4 years ago
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.06 s (155.0 files/s, 28369.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           6            284            241            872
TeX                              1              8              0            115
Markdown                         2             39              0             88
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             9            331            241           1075
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository '2627' was gathered on 2020/09/01.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
SJaffa                          16          3035           1493          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
SJaffa                     1397           46.0          3.1               11.67
whedon commented 4 years ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1093/mnras/sty696 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/sty1675 is OK
- 10.1086/174279 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/sty1675 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
whedon commented 4 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

kthyng commented 4 years ago

@whedon query scope

whedon commented 4 years ago

Submission flagged for editorial review.

danielskatz commented 4 years ago

👋 @SJaffa - I'm sorry to say that after discussion amongst the JOSS editors, we have decided that this submission does not meet the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages for other suggestions for how you might receive credit for your work.

danielskatz commented 4 years ago

@whedon reject

whedon commented 4 years ago

Paper rejected.