Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Failed to discover a Statement of need
section in paper
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1109/TEVC.2008.925798 is OK
- 10.1109/TEVC.2007.892759 is OK
- 10.1109/CEC.2009.4982949 is OK
- 10.1145/3377930.3390149 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-43680-3_9 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v092.i06 is OK
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990567 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02338 is OK
- 10.1145/2739482.2768462 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.09 s (593.2 files/s, 30383.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 49 549 236 1648
Markdown 2 50 0 124
TeX 1 10 0 110
YAML 3 14 9 67
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 55 623 245 1949
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '0642baeb5b9ddc8ee0fd9878' was
gathered on 2020/12/08.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Geoffrey Pruvost 60 2461 661 100.00
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Geoffrey Pruvost 2433 98.9 4.0 5.88
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@geoffreyp given that this submission is on the small side (in therms of number of lines of code). I have flagged this submission for an additional scope check by the editorial board. In particular our board will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. We should get back to you sometime next week.
Hi @geoffreyp, your paper is missing a section titled "Statement of Need." It also should start with a high level scientific summary that a scientific person not in your area would understand.
@melissawm are you able to edit this submission?
@whedon invite @melissawm as editor
@melissawm has been invited to edit this submission.
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Hello @kthyng, thank you for your feedback. The paper is updated with the "Statement of Need" section.
Yes, I can edit this submission. Thanks @kthyng !
@whedon assign @melissawm as editor
OK, the editor is @melissawm
Hello @geoffreyp ! Do you have any suggestions for reviewers from the JOSS reviewer list?
Hello @melissawm, this is a list of reviewers I could find in my domain/topic: sjvrijn, jmadera, jbytecode, petroniocandido, chkoar, andim
Thank you, @geoffreyp , and really sorry for the delay in responding.
Hello, @sjvrijn @jmadera! Would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Hi @melissawm, looks relevant to me indeed, I can review
@whedon assign @sjvrijn as reviewer
OK, @sjvrijn is now a reviewer
Hello, @petroniocandido! Would you be willing/available to review this submission for JOSS?
Hello, @chkoar! Would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Hey @melissawm, I'd be happy to help.
@whedon add @chkoar as reviewer
OK, @chkoar is now a reviewer
Thank you both, and @geoffreyp! Now that we have two reviewers, we can open the REVIEW issue - this PRE-REVIEW issue will be closed automatically, and we'll continue the work there.
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2974.
Submitting author: @geoffreyp (Geoffrey Pruvost) Repository: https://github.com/moead-framework/framework Version: 0.5.7.1 Editor: @melissawm Reviewers: @sjvrijn, @chkoar Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @geoffreyp. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@geoffreyp if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: