Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=1.53 s (51.1 files/s, 19341.0 lines/s)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fortran 90 35 2973 3385 14709
MATLAB 4 572 841 3755
Markdown 15 516 0 1305
Bourne Shell 13 155 99 508
Python 3 67 61 140
CMake 3 40 101 125
YAML 3 17 13 123
TeX 1 2 0 31
Windows Module Definition 1 3 0 9
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 78 4345 4500 20705
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '971269ea30b7d0a0420568e3' was
gathered on 2021/01/11.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Birgit Sutzl 4 3509 3 11.60
Chiel 3 11444 5722 56.72
Tom Grylls 1 35 18 0.18
dmey 6 278 9255 31.50
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Tom Grylls 22 62.9 7.6 4.55
dmey 246 88.5 12.3 22.76
PDF failed to compile for issue #2950 with the following error:
Can't find any papers to compile :-(
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-paper
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-paper. Reticulating splines etc...
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@tomgrylls I'll be looking for an editor to handle this submission. In the mean time it would be great if you could help suggest reviewers for this work. Also can you please review our documentation on what the paper should contain, in particular the "Statement of need" section is missing. You can update the paper here by calling: @whedon generate pdf
. Thanks.
@whedon assign @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editor
OK, the editor is @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moermanhttps://github.com/Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman thanks for your email. If more editor suggestions would be helpful, I have been through the list and would suggest the following:
kyleniemeyer wkearn abhishekbajpayee wkearn mzamoraz
In terms of the statement of need, we have integrated this requirement into the main body of the text (from the end of the first paragraph) as we felt this helped the readability of the paper and thought that a section title would break the paper up. However, if having the statement of the need requirement within the text is insufficient then please let us know and we will add a separate section and heading.
Thanks,
Tom
From: Kevin Mattheus Moerman notifications@github.com Sent: 14 January 2021 11:47 To: openjournals/joss-reviews joss-reviews@noreply.github.com Cc: Tom Grylls tgrylls@outlook.com; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: uDALES: large-eddy-simulation software for urban flow, dispersion, and microclimate modelling (#2950)
@whedonhttps://github.com/whedon assign @Kevin-Mattheus-Moermanhttps://github.com/Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editor
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2950#issuecomment-760146693, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMQO73KW6OM34MWEKV4NRMTSZ3KWNANCNFSM4V5HUEFA.
To clarify, I meant reviewer suggestions not editors, sorry about that. If more suggestions would be helpful I have added more options to the list in my previous email:
jayten corentin-dev kyleniemeyer wkearn abhishekbajpayee wkearn mzamoraz zbeekman chennachaos ashwinvis adam-m-jcbs rabernat kegiljarhus p-costa ashwinvis
Thanks for your help and apologies for any confusion on the below,
Tom
From: Tom Grylls tgrylls@outlook.com Sent: 17 January 2021 11:36 To: openjournals/joss-reviews joss-reviews@noreply.github.com; openjournals/joss-reviews reply@reply.github.com Cc: Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: uDALES: large-eddy-simulation software for urban flow, dispersion, and microclimate modelling (#2950)
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moermanhttps://github.com/Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman thanks for your email. If more editor suggestions would be helpful, I have been through the list and would suggest the following:
kyleniemeyer wkearn abhishekbajpayee wkearn mzamoraz
In terms of the statement of need, we have integrated this requirement into the main body of the text (from the end of the first paragraph) as we felt this helped the readability of the paper and thought that a section title would break the paper up. However, if having the statement of the need requirement within the text is insufficient then please let us know and we will add a separate section and heading.
Thanks,
Tom
From: Kevin Mattheus Moerman notifications@github.com Sent: 14 January 2021 11:47 To: openjournals/joss-reviews joss-reviews@noreply.github.com Cc: Tom Grylls tgrylls@outlook.com; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: uDALES: large-eddy-simulation software for urban flow, dispersion, and microclimate modelling (#2950)
@whedonhttps://github.com/whedon assign @Kevin-Mattheus-Moermanhttps://github.com/Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editor
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2950#issuecomment-760146693, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMQO73KW6OM34MWEKV4NRMTSZ3KWNANCNFSM4V5HUEFA.
@leifdenby @jakubfabian @wimvanderbauwhede @crshapiro @tonyinme @claireverhulst @JuhaTonttila @fjansson would you be interested in reviewing this work for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS): uDALES: large-eddy-simulation software for urban flow, dispersion, and microclimate modelling?
The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place. Here is an example an ongoing review process to give you an idea.
If you are interested in reviewing, you can comment here. Thanks!
I am willing to review this work, but my current load at work is very high. How quickly does this need to be done?
Thanks @wimvanderbauwhede that's great. We are hearing this from a lot of editors and reviewers at the moment so this is totally understandable. We usually aim for a 2 week review time but we can and have been very flexible especially in these challenging times. I'd say we will start the review within a week and the review will likely be ongoing for about 1-2 months (given peoples current time constraints) (although usually people submit minor initial comments right away given our open review process). Does that sound reasonable? Let me know what works for you.
@leifdenby @jakubfabian @crshapiro @tonyinme @claireverhulst @JuhaTonttila @fjansson would you be interested in reviewing this work for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS): uDALES: large-eddy-simulation software for urban flow, dispersion, and microclimate modelling?
The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place. Here is an example an ongoing review process to give you an idea.
If you are interested in reviewing, you can comment here. Thanks!
Thank you for inviting me to review software for this innovative journal. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to commit to being a reviewer for something like this.
@leifdenby @jakubfabian @tonyinme @claireverhulst @JuhaTonttila @fjansson would you be interested in reviewing this work for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS): uDALES: large-eddy-simulation software for urban flow, dispersion, and microclimate modelling?
The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place. Here is an example an ongoing review process to give you an idea.
If you are interested in reviewing, you can comment here. Thanks!
Hey Kevin,
Thanks for the invite. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to commit to this.
Thanks, Tony
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 3:27 AM Kevin Mattheus Moerman < notifications@github.com> wrote:
@leifdenby https://github.com/leifdenby @jakubfabian https://github.com/jakubfabian @tonyinme https://github.com/tonyinme @claireverhulst https://github.com/claireverhulst @JuhaTonttila https://github.com/JuhaTonttila @fjansson https://github.com/fjansson would you be interested in reviewing this work for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS): uDALES: large-eddy-simulation software for urban flow, dispersion, and microclimate modelling?
The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place. Here is an example an ongoing review process to give you an idea.
If you are interested in reviewing, you can comment here. Thanks!
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2950#issuecomment-775041192, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACULCAPBLEXLJXHZK34O2D3S564BXANCNFSM4V5HUEFA .
@crshapiro @tonyinme thanks for the response. I understand regarding time. Please note that we are not expecting the usual quick turn around at the moment. Instead we can be very flexible and wait if you need quite a lot of time (some reviews take months at the moment). So given this, please let me know if you feel we could assign you but give you (lots of) extra time to complete this review at your own pace. All the best on your busy schedules and thanks for getting back to me.
@wimvanderbauwhede thanks for getting back to me. Many of us are under very unusual time constrains so as the message above shows we can be very flexible regarding time to complete this review. We can likely give you the time you need to complete this work at your own pace. Let me know if you can still help. Thanks again for getting back to me.
Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman sorry for dropping this for a while. Yes, I'm still willing to help. I will try to have a look at this in the next two weeks.
@whedon assign @wimvanderbauwhede as reviewer
OK, @wimvanderbauwhede is now a reviewer
@claireverhulst @JuhaTonttila @fjansson @jayten @corentin-dev @zbeekman @ashwinvis @adam-m-jcbs @rabernat @p-costa would you be interested in reviewing this work for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS): uDALES: large-eddy-simulation software for urban flow, dispersion, and microclimate modelling?
Note we can give you a lot of additional time as we understand reviewers need extra flexibility at the moment.
The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place. Here is an example an ongoing review process to give you an idea.
If you are interested in reviewing, you can comment here. Thanks!
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman I am willing to take it up if I can take ~1 month to review the work.
Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, I am happy to review it if I can take about one month.
@whedon add @p-costa as reviewer
OK, @p-costa is now a reviewer
@whedon add @ashwinvis as reviewer
OK, @ashwinvis is now a reviewer
Great we now have 3 reviewers and I'll initiate the review process. If others invited want to join I can add them in the review issue as well. Thanks a lot for agreeing to help!
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3055.
Sorry I missed this, my email inbox is a bit of an EPA superfund site at the moment. Looks very interesting, and I appreciate being thought of. Hopefully I'll have the chance to review some CFD for JOSS in the future!
Submitting author: @tomgrylls (Tom Grylls) Repository: https://github.com/uDALES/u-dales Version: 1.0.0 Editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Reviewers: @wimvanderbauwhede, @p-costa, @ashwinvis Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @tomgrylls. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @kyleniemeyer.
@tomgrylls if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: