Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.27 s (265.2 files/s, 73563.4 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 41 2066 4227 12221
Markdown 2 93 0 498
YAML 6 25 23 159
CUDA 2 38 66 142
reStructuredText 14 52 67 104
JSON 1 0 0 40
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
Bourne Shell 2 6 14 20
Bourne Again Shell 1 6 4 18
Dockerfile 1 4 7 14
make 1 5 7 13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 72 2303 4416 13255
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository 'a8658face0a8c6503406fcd4' was
gathered on 2021/01/28.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
David Keitel 348 15016 6978 36.50
Gregory Ashton 285 13432 8478 36.36
Reinhard Prix 10 4217 2311 10.83
Rodrigo Tenorio 15 1279 546 3.03
Rodrigo-Tenorio 142 2406 1779 6.95
gregory.ashton 111 3086 723 6.32
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
David Keitel 10614 70.7 6.0 9.31
Gregory Ashton 2832 21.1 40.5 4.38
Reinhard Prix 2359 55.9 18.9 0.42
Rodrigo Tenorio 215 16.8 5.8 0.47
Rodrigo-Tenorio 2494 103.7 3.4 6.98
PDF failed to compile for issue #2994 with the following error:
Can't find any papers to compile :-(
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss. Reticulating splines etc...
PDF failed to compile for issue #2994 with the following error:
/app/vendor/ruby-2.6.6/lib/ruby/2.6.0/psych.rb:577:in initialize': No such file or directory @ rb_sysopen - af475834051feb14868d9a04/joss-paper/paper.yml (Errno::ENOENT) from /app/vendor/ruby-2.6.6/lib/ruby/2.6.0/psych.rb:577:in
open'
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.6.6/lib/ruby/2.6.0/psych.rb:577:in load_file' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:125:in
load_yaml'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:87:in initialize' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in
new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in set_paper' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:66:in
prepare'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in run' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in
invoke_command'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor.rb:387:in dispatch' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in
start'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:131:in <top (required)>' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in
load'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `
@whedon check references from branch joss
Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.7935/GT1W-FZ16 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.063001 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-540-76965-1_24 is OK
- 10.1016/j.parco.2011.09.001 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.064023 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv2422 is OK
- 10.1142/S021773231730035X is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103020 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063011 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/aade34 is OK
- 10.3390/universe5110217 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.191102 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/staa3624 is OK
- 10.1016/j.softx.2020.100634 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss. Reticulating splines etc...
PDF failed to compile for issue #2994 with the following error:
/app/vendor/ruby-2.6.6/lib/ruby/2.6.0/psych.rb:577:in initialize': No such file or directory @ rb_sysopen - d08b089bfd93fdba0f8da8b4/joss-paper/paper.yml (Errno::ENOENT) from /app/vendor/ruby-2.6.6/lib/ruby/2.6.0/psych.rb:577:in
open'
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.6.6/lib/ruby/2.6.0/psych.rb:577:in load_file' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:125:in
load_yaml'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:87:in initialize' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in
new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in set_paper' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:66:in
prepare'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in run' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in
invoke_command'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor.rb:387:in dispatch' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in
start'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:131:in <top (required)>' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in
load'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `
đ @openjournals/dev - can you help with this compilation error? I don't see anything in the error message that I can use to diagnose the problem
I think the presence of a paper.tex
file is confusing Whedon: https://github.com/PyFstat/PyFstat/blob/joss/joss-paper/paper.tex
I would suggest removing this and trying again.
đ @dbkeitel - can you remove paper.tex from the repo, and then try the compilation, by putting @whedon generate pdf from branch joss
in a new comment here? I'm going to mark this as paused for the minute
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss. Reticulating splines etc...
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Thanks @danielskatz @arfon that has fixed it! And thanks for getting thing started, too.
@whedon assign me as editor
OK, the editor is @danielskatz
@dbkeitel - do you have any suggestions for potential reviewers? Please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
đ @khanx169, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html (You were suggested by @eliu23)
đ @svigeland - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
If those first wo people you asked aren't available, cmbiwer would be a great choice (GW analyst with experience developing similar packages, but no direct contact with this project).
Some more likely-looking people (with python & astro listed as language/field) going up from the bottom of the table would be e.g.: RobertRosca arjunsavel sibirrer JBorrow cavestruz .
đ @cmbiwer - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
đ @khanx169, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html (You were suggested by @eliu23)
@danielskatz yes I'd be happy to review.
@khanx169 - thanks. I'll assign you now, but we won't actually start the review until we get at least one more reviewer as well
@whedon assign @khanx169 as reviewer
OK, @khanx169 is now a reviewer
đ @svigeland - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Apologies, but I'm unable to review now.
đ @RobertRosca - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?
Hey, sure I'd be happy to review! I can read through the guidelines and get started Monday.
Thanks - I'll assign you and we'll start the review in a new issue
@whedon add @RobertRosca as reviewer
OK, @RobertRosca is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3000.
Submitting author: @dbkeitel (David Keitel) Repository: https://github.com/PyFstat/PyFstat/ Version: v1.11.1 Editor: @danielskatz Reviewers: @khanx169, @RobertRosca Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @dbkeitel. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@dbkeitel if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: