search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
717 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: gmr: Gaussian Mixture Regression #3004

Closed whedon closed 3 years ago

whedon commented 3 years ago

Submitting author: @AlexanderFabisch (Alexander Fabisch) Repository: https://github.com/AlexanderFabisch/gmr Version: 1.4 Editor: @mikldk Reviewers: @vs74, @inakleinbottle Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AlexanderFabisch. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@AlexanderFabisch if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 3 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
whedon commented 3 years ago 
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.06 s (396.2 files/s, 52093.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          19            539            677           1522
Markdown                         1             23              0            128
TeX                              1              5              0             61
reStructuredText                 1             57             45             51
SVG                              1              0              0             34
YAML                             1              0              0             14
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            24            624            722           1810
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository 'e9b0a6c4140f716fa8fd041a' was
gathered on 2021/02/04.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Alexander Fabisch              106          3381            642           99.48
Joao Felipe Santos               2            10             11            0.52

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Alexander Fabisch          2730           80.7         36.9                5.60
Joao Felipe Santos            8           80.0         69.1                0.00
whedon commented 3 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/TSMCB.2006.886952 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neunet.2015.05.005 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
whedon commented 3 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

Hi @terrytangyuan, could you edit this submission?

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

@whedon invite @terrytangyuan as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

@terrytangyuan has been invited to edit this submission.

terrytangyuan commented 3 years ago

Sorry I am a little overloaded at the moment and it would be great if you could find others to edit.

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

@terrytangyuan that's alright, will do.

@mikldk, could you edit this submission?

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

@whedon invite @mikldk as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

@mikldk has been invited to edit this submission.

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@whedon assign me as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, the editor is @mikldk

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@AlexanderFabisch - thanks for this submission.

Can you please maybe comment on how your contribution relates to the mclust package in R, see e.g. https://mclust-org.github.io/mclust/ where also a few publications are mentioned, including Fraley C. and Raftery A. E. (2002) Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis and density estimation, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97/458, pp. 611-631.

Do you have any suggestions for reviewers?

AlexanderFabisch commented 3 years ago

Hi @mikldk,

if I didn't miss anything, mclust focuses on clustering and density estimation, while gmr focuses on multimodal regression. mclust is an R package and gmr is a Python package.

I am sorry, I don't have any suggestion for a reviewer, requirements would be knowledge about Python and machine learning or something similar.

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@oesteban, @benjamin-lee: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@oesteban, @benjamin-lee: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@juliensiebert, @acguidoum: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

Benjamin-Lee commented 3 years ago

I'm always happy to help with JOSS reviews but this is out of my area. Sorry I can't help!

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@vs74, @inakleinbottle: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

vasudev-sharma commented 3 years ago

Hey @mikldk, thanks for tagging me. I would be glad to review this submission.

inakleinbottle commented 3 years ago

@mikldk I'd be happy to review the submission.

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@whedon assign @vs74 as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @vs74 is now a reviewer

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @inakleinbottle as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @inakleinbottle is now a reviewer

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3054.