Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
PDF failed to compile for issue #3008 with the following error:
Can't find any papers to compile :-(
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.83 s (853.2 files/s, 86656.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML 72 0 0 31587
C++ 37 1106 1000 7140
reStructuredText 541 8438 13726 4342
XSD 3 111 10 1175
C/C++ Header 15 274 1091 934
Python 4 111 98 410
CMake 32 68 26 385
YAML 3 8 8 102
Markdown 1 21 0 38
Bourne Shell 1 3 0 30
DOS Batch 1 8 1 27
XSLT 1 0 5 10
make 1 4 6 10
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 712 10152 15971 46190
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository 'd169aa1d831559f0cd79f5dd' was
gathered on 2021/02/04.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Jens 1 8 19 0.04
Peter Bygrave 1 23 10 0.05
Robert Shaw 38 38052 25918 97.02
Thomas Dresselhaus 2 283 250 0.81
pk 1 2 0 0.00
robashaw 2 75 3 0.12
thomas-dresselhaus 2 720 572 1.96
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Jens 8 100.0 0.0 0.00
Peter Bygrave 9 39.1 1.3 0.00
Robert Shaw 11620 30.5 1.5 19.06
Thomas Dresselhaus 212 74.9 1.5 5.66
thomas-dresselhaus 322 44.7 2.0 1.55
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss. Reticulating splines etc...
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@robashaw if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Possible reviewers taken from the list, based on being comfortable with C++ and having expertise in computational chemistry/electronic structure:
lorenzo-rovigatti felipeZ nicorenaud awgwvk smutao xwang862
Thanks @robashaw. We will use this pre-review issue to assign the editor and reviewers.
@meg-simula, can you edit this submission?
@whedon invite @meg-simula as editor
@meg-simula has been invited to edit this submission.
@kyleniemeyer I'm essentially OOO until March 1 2021. If still relevant, I can handle this after that.
@meg-simula ah, I didn't realize, that's alright.
Hi @poulson, do you have bandwidth to edit this submission?
@whedon invite @poulson as editor
@poulson has been invited to edit this submission.
@whedon assign poulson as editor
OK, the editor is @poulson
Hi Lorenzo (@lorenzo-rovigatti) :wave:.
In addition to you being recommended by Robert Shaw (@robashaw) as an expert reviewer for this submission, your C++/Python project BaggieAnalysis also seems to be quite relevant (https://github.com/lorenzo-rovigatti/baggianalysis).
Please let me know if you would be willing and able to review this submission on "libecpint: A C++ library for the efficient evaluation of integrals over effective core potentials".
Hi Felipe (@felipeZ) :wave:.
In addition to your work on the C++ VOCTA-XTP library (https://github.com/votca/xtp/commits?author=felipeZ), you have been recommended as an expert by Robert Shaw (@robashaw).
Please let me know if you would be willing and able to review this submission on "libecpint: A C++ library for the efficient evaluation of integrals over effective core potentials".
Hi Nicolas (@nicorenaud) :wave:,
While I don't see any C++ projects on your GitHub profile, you have been recommended as an expert reviewer by Robert Shaw (@robashaw) for this submission, entitled "libecpint: A C++ library for the efficient evaluation of integrals over effective core potentials".
Please let me know if you would be willing to accept this invitation to review this C++ computational physics submission.
Hi Jack(@poulson) and Robert (@robashaw), I am very happy to help with the review!
Hi Jack(@poulson) and Robert (@robashaw),
I'll be happy to help! It'll be my first review so bare with me though :-)
@whedon add @felipeZ as reviewer
OK, @felipeZ is now a reviewer
@whedon add @lorenzo-rovigatti as reviewer
OK, @lorenzo-rovigatti is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3039.
Submitting author: @robashaw (Robert A. Shaw) Repository: https://github.com/robashaw/libecpint Version: v1.0.4 Editor: @poulson Reviewers: @felipeZ, @lorenzo-rovigatti Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @robashaw. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@robashaw if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: