[PRE REVIEW]: bleiglas: An R package for interpolation and visualisation of spatiotemporal data with 3D tessellation

[whedon]

Submitting author: @nevrome (Clemens Schmid) Repository: https://github.com/nevrome/bleiglas Version: v0.1.2 Editor: @vissarion Reviewers: @corybrunson , @fabian-s Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @nevrome. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@nevrome if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.24 s (127.3 files/s, 12680.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               19            200            297            975
Markdown                         2             90              0            449
Rmd                              2            111            209            178
JSON                             1              0              0            172
C++                              3             30             30            155
TeX                              1              0              0            121
C                                1              5              5             20
YAML                             1              0              2             19
C/C++ Header                     1              4              2             14
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            31            440            545           2103
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository 'f1dd26ffd5d2dfc6f2bc423c' was
gathered on 2021/02/12.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Clemens Schmid                  11           591            326          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Clemens Schmid              265           44.8          0.8               13.96

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1063/1.3215722 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-020-58834-6 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101357 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/staa1379 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-29538-1 is OK
- 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3188v1 is OK
- 10.32614/RJ-2018-009 is OK
- 10.1177/1059712319860842 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[arfon]

@whedon query scope

@nevrome - because of the relatively small size of this package I'm going to flag it for editorial review.

[whedon]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[kthyng]

@nevrome The editorial board decided this is in scope.

@vissarion would you be up for editing this submission?

[kthyng]

@whedon invite @vissarion as editor

[whedon]

@vissarion has been invited to edit this submission.

[vissarion]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @vissarion

[vissarion]

:wave: @corybrunson & @amritagos, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[corybrunson]

@vissarion i would be glad to and will be able to complete my initial review within 3 weeks.

[vissarion]

Thanks @corybrunson for your quick reply.

[vissarion]

@whedon assign @corybrunson as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @corybrunson is now a reviewer

[vissarion]

:wave: @GISerDaishaoqing, @becarioprecario, @fpl, @fabian-s, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[amritagos]

@vissarion I am so sorry for the late reply. I'm really busy with some deadlines and will not be able to review.

[fabian-s]

@vissarion I'll do it :smiley_cat:

[vissarion]

@amritagos no problem at all! @fabian-s thanks for the quick reply!

[vissarion]

@whedon add @fabian-s as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @fabian-s is now a reviewer

[vissarion]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3092.

[becarioprecario]

Hi,

Thanks but I am not available at the moment.

Best,

Virgilio

El 8 mar 2021, a las 9:35, Vissarion Fisikopoulos notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> escribió:

👋 @GISerDaiShaoqinghttps://github.com/GISerDaiShaoqing, @becarioprecariohttps://github.com/becarioprecario, @fplhttps://github.com/fpl, @fabian-shttps://github.com/fabian-s, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3034#issuecomment-792578213, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYD6WSMDJHYXDTO3CAHMB3TCSD63ANCNFSM4XQ2ZVPQ.

[GISerDaiShaoqing]

Hi,

Sorry to reply to you late. Thanks for the invitation. If necessary now, I also could be a reviewer.

Best,

Shaoqing Dai