Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@whedon accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.3389/fninf.2011.00034 is OK
- 10.3233/APC190017 is OK
- 10.1103/physrevx.10.021002 is OK
- 10.17815/jlsrf-4-121-1 is OK
- 10.3389/fnana.2018.00075 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.020 is OK
- 10.1098/rsif.2015.0734 is OK
- 10.1145/2833157.2833162 is OK
- 10.1103/physreve.83.041804 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2017.00005 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.055 is OK
- 10.1364/opex.13.004420 is OK
- 10.1117/1.3241986 is OK
- 10.1016/j.optcom.2020.126113 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/joss-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/2274
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/2274, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true
@whedon accept deposit=true
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
Congratulations @fmatuschke this work is now published in JOSS. Thank you @oliviaguest for editing this submission!
Thanks also to @vigji, @glyg, @RealPolitiX for your help reviewing this work!!!
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03042/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03042)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03042">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03042/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03042/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03042
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Submitting author: @fmatuschke (Felix Matuschke) Repository: https://github.com/3d-pli/fastpli Version: 1.1.0 Editor: @oliviaguest Reviewers: @vigji, @glyg, @RealPolitiX Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.4720075
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@vigji, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @oliviaguest know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Review checklist for @glyg
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @vigji
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @RealPolitiX
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper