search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: imodels: a python package for fitting interpretable models #3046

Closed whedon closed 3 years ago

whedon commented 3 years ago

Submitting author: @csinva (Chandan Singh) Repository: https://github.com/csinva/imodels Version: v0.2.7 Editor: @vissarion Reviewers: @jungtaekkim, @yxoos Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @csinva. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@csinva if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 3 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
whedon commented 3 years ago 
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.62 s (173.1 files/s, 46561.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            41           2021              0          18218
Python                          48           1059           1221           4045
CSS                              1             40             21            347
Markdown                         7             88              0            284
Jupyter Notebook                 5              0           1323            231
TeX                              1              9              0             87
YAML                             2              5              2             29
Bourne Shell                     2              0              1             17
TOML                             1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           108           3222           2568          23259
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository '7885deb3e66e86d35ba27917' was
gathered on 2021/02/20.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Avi A                            1             1              0            0.01
Chandan Singh                   73          8266           2387           74.80
Keyan Nasseri                   48          2007           1581           25.19

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Chandan Singh              4965           60.1          2.5                8.64
Keyan Nasseri              1360           67.8          1.8                9.26
whedon commented 3 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

whedon commented 3 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/s10994-015-5528-6 may be a valid DOI for title: Supersparse linear integer models for optimized medical scoring systems
- 10.1214/15-aoas848 may be a valid DOI for title: Interpretable classifiers using rules and bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction model
- 10.1201/9780367816377-16 may be a valid DOI for title: Interpretable machine learning
- 10.1214/07-aoas148 may be a valid DOI for title: Predictive learning via rule ensembles

INVALID DOIs

- None
csinva commented 3 years ago

Just added all the missing DOIs!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 years ago

@whedon generate pdf

whedon commented 3 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

csinva commented 3 years ago

Anyone with experience in interpretable machine learning and python would make a great reviewer! Looking at the list of volunteer reviewers, I think the following people would make wonderful reviewers (starting from the bottom of the volunteer reviewer list):

hbaniecki, xiaohk, expectopatronum

kthyng commented 3 years ago

Hi @galessiorob are you up for editing this submission?

kthyng commented 3 years ago

@whedon invite @galessiorob as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

@galessiorob has been invited to edit this submission.

galessiorob commented 3 years ago

@kthyng I'm spread out a bit thin at the moment, apologies for the delayed response.

danielskatz commented 3 years ago

👋 @cMadan - are you able to edit this perhaps?

danielskatz commented 3 years ago

@whedon invite @cMadan as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

@cMadan has been invited to edit this submission.

cMadan commented 3 years ago

I don't think I can take on another review at this time, sorry!

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

Hi @csinva, it looks like editor availability in this area is a bit low at the moment (many of our editors are at reduced capacity at the moment), so I'm going to put this in the waitlist for now.

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

@whedon invite @vissarion as editor

Hi @vissarion, could you edit this one?

whedon commented 3 years ago

@vissarion has been invited to edit this submission.

vissarion commented 3 years ago

@whedon assign @vissarion as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, the editor is @vissarion

vissarion commented 3 years ago

:wave: @RohitRathore1, @yxoos, @jungtaekkim, @juliensiebert, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

jungtaekkim commented 3 years ago

I am willing to review this submission.

amirhszd commented 3 years ago

I am open to review as well.

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021, 3:11 AM Jungtaek Kim @.***> wrote:

I am willing to review this submission.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3046#issuecomment-822229579, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIRXWO5HMSCJX6LI6YWSXYLTJPJSTANCNFSM4X5X5FJQ .

vissarion commented 3 years ago

@whedon assign @jungtaekkim as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @jungtaekkim is now a reviewer

vissarion commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @yxoos as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @yxoos is now a reviewer

vissarion commented 3 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3192.