Closed whedon closed 2 years ago
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
@JaroslavHron, @uellue – many thanks for your reviews here and to @mjsottile for editing this submission! I realize this review has been more challenging than some, and I'm deeply grateful for all of the time and effort you've invested here. JOSS relies upon the volunteer effort of people like you and we simply wouldn't be able to do this without you ✨
@jason-rumengan – your paper is now accepted and published in JOSS :zap::rocket::boom:
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03051/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03051)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03051">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03051/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03051/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03051
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
We'd like to thank the reviewers as well as the editors for going through this long process and helping to considerably improve this paper.
Submitting author: @jason-rumengan (Jason Rumengan) Repository: https://gitlab.com/jason-rumengan/pyarma Version: v0.500.2 Editor: @mjsottile Reviewer: @JaroslavHron, @uellue Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.5564389
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@JaroslavHron & @uellue, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @mjsottile know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Review checklist for @JaroslavHron
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @uellue
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper