Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1121/10.0001811 is OK
- 10.1111/csp2.267 is OK
- 10.3389/fmars.2020.00100 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105109 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.107949 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/joss-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/2375
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/2375, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true
I see version and archive look good ✔️
The paper looks good though a question: what are the stars at the bottom of the first page, and I don't think you need a section "Figures".
Thanks @kthyng! I have removed the "Figures" section as well as the stars at the bottom of the page. Let me know if anything else is necessary!
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Ok thanks @hansenjohnson! Everything looks good to go!
@whedon accept deposit=true
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
Congrats on your new publication @hansenjohnson! Thanks to editor @KristinaRiemer and reviewers @pjbouchet and @mcsiple for your hard work and expertise!!
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03094/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03094)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03094">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03094/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03094/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03094
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Fantastic! Thank you so much again to all of you for your time, feedback, and guidance through this process. Your efforts have greatly improved the manuscript and application. Submitting to JOSS was a wonderful experience!
Thanks for your submission @hansenjohnson, and to @pjbouchet and @mcsiple for your reviews!
Submitting author: @hansenjohnson (Hansen Johnson) Repository: https://github.com/hansenjohnson/WhaleMap Version: v1.0.0 Editor: @KristinaRiemer Reviewer: @pjbouchet, @mcsiple Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.4913270
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@pjbouchet & @mcsiple, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @KristinaRiemer know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Review checklist for @pjbouchet
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @mcsiple
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper