Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1109/IPDPS.2008.4536319 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.12.024 is OK
- 10.1109/5992.814662 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.11.021 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.2972 is OK
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-384988-5.00009-7 is OK
- 10.6084/m9.figshare.92166.v1 is OK
- 10.1177/1094342011429952 is OK
- 10.1260/1748-3018.7.3.301 is OK
- 10.4208/cicp.020215.150515sw is OK
- 10.1145/2588768.2576787 is OK
- 10.1145/2590830 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02444 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- 10.1016/0021-9991 is INVALID
- 10.21105/joss.02879 is INVALID
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=1.78 s (50.0 files/s, 36790.1 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bourne Shell 10 5185 6020 31749
m4 21 1108 103 10913
C/C++ Header 20 284 631 5223
C++ 14 239 236 1325
TeX 1 18 0 235
Markdown 5 30 0 218
CMake 2 49 89 209
Python 2 67 123 130
reStructuredText 5 70 71 98
make 4 25 11 91
Jupyter Notebook 3 0 760 79
YAML 1 1 0 37
Bourne Again Shell 1 1 0 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 89 7077 8044 50309
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository 'd71e82d77755946c09e9b4b3' was
gathered on 2021/03/13.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Rio Yokota 29 51608 1937 22.44
Tingyu Wang 490 67516 108103 73.61
bloodysin 67 4335 5075 3.94
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Rio Yokota 1131 2.2 9.5 0.18
Tingyu Wang 6926 10.3 16.6 14.09
bloodysin 201 4.6 27.4 4.98
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@whedon invite @poulson as editor
Hi @poulson, could you edit this submission for us?
@poulson has been invited to edit this submission.
@whedon set @poulson as editor
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@whedon commands
@whedon assign @poulson as editor
OK, the editor is @poulson
Hi Tingyu (@tingyu66) :wave: .
Please let me know if there are any reviewers from the following list https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers which you feel would be especially suited for providing feedback on your submission. It's possible to have someone not on this list review, but it is much preferred if they have already signed up for JOSS.
Possible reviewers:
Hi Berenger (@berenger-eu) :wave:.
Given your authorship of the TBFMM JOSS paper, please let me know if you would be willing to serve as a reviewer on this submission on a high-performance C++/Python FMM implementation.
Hi Siva (@sivaramambikasaran) :wave:,
Given your expertise in FMM and its algebraic analogues, please let me know if you would be willing to serve as a reviewer for this submission on a high-performance C++/Python FMM implementation.
Hi Jack, Yes I agree, thanks to let me participate. Bérenger
Thank you Bérenger!
@whedon add @berenger-eu as reviewer
OK, @berenger-eu is now a reviewer
Hi Nikos (@pitsianis) :wave: -- I hate to ask for you to review yet another paper, but would you be willing to serve as a reviewer on this C++/Python submission on high-performance Fast Multipole Methods?
@poulson If I am correct, some checkboxes should be on the first post, right? Should I do something to make them appearing? Maybe it will be automatically done after all the reviewers will be selected(?) Ho, I forgot, this is a PRE review! sorry.
Yes, we need at least two reviewers -- and ideally three -- before starting the review.
I will do it
Thank you Nikos!
@whedon add @pitsianis as reviewer
OK, @pitsianis is now a reviewer
Hi Siva (@sivaramambikasaran) :wave: -- I wanted to circle back to see if you might have time to serve as a reviewer for this submission on high-performance FMM. We have two reviewers, but three is always preferred and I believe you would provide helpful feedback.
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3145.
@whedon commands
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands
# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors
# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers
EDITORIAL TASKS
# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf
# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name
# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references
# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Submitting author: @tingyu66 (Tingyu Wang) Repository: https://github.com/exafmm/exafmm-t Version: v0.1.1 Editor: @poulson Reviewers: @berenger-eu, @pitsianis Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @tingyu66. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @poulson.
@tingyu66 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: