Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.24 s (318.4 files/s, 62843.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 47 1819 2000 6420
TeX 1 148 0 1893
reStructuredText 18 537 417 513
Markdown 1 148 0 404
YAML 6 18 0 115
TOML 1 1 0 20
Jupyter Notebook 1 0 511 18
make 1 4 6 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 76 2675 2934 9392
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository 'a3ada5064c96b198323881bd' was
gathered on 2021/03/14.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Alex Liberzon 1 4 3 0.01
JarnoRFB 2 463 319 1.56
Justin Shenk 263 17100 9899 53.87
Madhav 2 17 15 0.06
Madhav Thakker 6 61 1779 3.67
Saran-nns 161 8173 4142 24.57
Saranraj Nambusubram 1 2 27 0.06
Wolf Byttner 134 3520 4596 16.19
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Alex Liberzon 2 50.0 6.8 0.00
JarnoRFB 232 50.1 24.4 3.02
Justin Shenk 6129 35.8 19.3 8.68
Madhav 45 264.7 0.2 0.00
Madhav Thakker 20 32.8 0.4 5.00
Saran-nns 1658 20.3 2.2 8.38
Wolf Byttner 2153 61.2 1.3 8.04
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00020 is OK
- 10.1111/eth.12739 is OK
- 10.4103/0976-500X.72351 is OK
- 10.1161/01.str.30.12.2752 is OK
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541128 is OK
- 10.1021/ac60214a047 is OK
- 10.3390/s19153274 is OK
- 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.149 is OK
- 10.2147/DDDT.S56071 is OK
- 10.1186/s40462-017-0097-x is OK
- 10.1155/2016/6846721 is OK
- 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.185 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.09.038 is OK
- 10.1098/rsif.2017.0885 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-018-32949-3 is OK
- 10.1007/s10182-017-0302-7 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-018-32949-3 is OK
- 10.1109/ISM.2008.115 is OK
- 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591745 is OK
- 10.1007/BF00379695 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-540-74553-2_44 is OK
- 10.1007/s10462-018-9619-1 is OK
- 10.1553/giscience2019_01_s54 is OK
- 10.1214/aoms/1177703732 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.06.004 is OK
- 10.1007/s10651-006-0015-7 is OK
- 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.018 is OK
- 10.1145/3159652.3159671 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0220751 is OK
- 10.1145/2743025 is OK
- 10.3390/nu11102430 is OK
- 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01454 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0211063 is OK
- 10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00103-3 is OK
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.12.005 is OK
- 10.1111/eth.12739 is OK
- 10.1101/345132 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.02.001 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.01.010 is OK
- 10.5607/en.2014.23.1.104 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.035 is OK
- 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00530-3 is OK
- 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.06.023 is OK
- 10.1016/S0165-0270(99)00156-9 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.12.016 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.004 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a is OK
- 10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.755 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3509134 is OK
- 10.1186/s40462-019-0177-1 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412 is OK
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541128 is OK
- 10.3791/2423 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-0123-7_17 is OK
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1206-09.2009 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2004.00064.x is OK
- 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.07.015 is OK
- 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.006 is OK
- 10.1186/1743-0003-2-20 is OK
- 10.1007/s10182-017-0302-7 is OK
- 10.1093/brain/119.2.551 is OK
- 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90545-4 is OK
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5692-07.2008 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0202505 is OK
- 10.7150/thno.17559 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.004 is OK
- 10.1016/j.coisb.2017.07.012 is OK
- 10.1111/jnc.14213 is OK
- 10.1145/2743025 is OK
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.12.005 is OK
- 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.9892.2 is OK
- 10.1038/nature19356 is OK
- 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00139.2006 is OK
- 10.1002/9780470942390.mo140229 is OK
- 10.1038/ncb437 is OK
- 10.3758/BF03195394 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.0809053106 is OK
- 10.1038/ncomms1064 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.001 is OK
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.01.004 is OK
- 10.1038/sc.2010.128 is OK
- 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.07.015 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2016.00042 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.12.016 is OK
- 10.5607/en.2014.23.1.104 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.035 is OK
- 10.1038/srep16171 is OK
- 10.4018/978-1-7998-5101-1.ch001 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2020.00518 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1109/cvprw.2019.00359 may be a valid DOI for title: Social Ways: Learning Multi-Modal Distributions of Pedestrian Trajectories with GANs
- 10.1109/cvprw.2019.00358 may be a valid DOI for title: Peeking into the Future: Predicting Future Person Activities and Locations in Videos
- 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00868 may be a valid DOI for title: TraPHic: Trajectory Prediction in Dense and Heterogeneous Traffic Using Weighted Interactions
- 10.25080/majora-92bf1922-00a may be a valid DOI for title: Data structures for statistical computing in python
- 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00868 may be a valid DOI for title: TraPHic: Trajectory Prediction in Dense and Heterogeneous Traffic Using Weighted Interactions
- 10.1007/s10182-017-0302-7 may be a valid DOI for title: Statistical modelling of individual animal movement: an overview of key methods and a discussion of practical challenges
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005115 may be a valid DOI for title: M-Track: A New Software for Automated Detection of Grooming Trajectories in Mice
- 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00868 may be a valid DOI for title: TraPHic: Trajectory Prediction in Dense and Heterogeneous Traffic Using Weighted Interactions
- 10.1109/cvprw.2019.00358 may be a valid DOI for title: Peeking into the Future: Predicting Future Person Activities and Locations in Videos
- 10.1109/cvprw.2019.00359 may be a valid DOI for title: Social Ways: Learning Multi-Modal Distributions of Pedestrian Trajectories with GANs
- 10.1109/seaa.2018.00018 may be a valid DOI for title: Software Engineering Challenges of Deep Learning
- 10.1007/978-3-540-74553-2_44 may be a valid DOI for title: Mining Trajectory Patterns Using Hidden Markov Models
- 10.1016/s0047-6374(01)00324-4 may be a valid DOI for title: Automated measurement of age-related changes in the locomotor response to environmental novelty and home-cage activity.
- 10.1109/seaa.2018.00018 may be a valid DOI for title: Software Engineering Challenges of Deep Learning
- 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00868 may be a valid DOI for title: TraPHic: Trajectory Prediction in Dense and Heterogeneous Traffic Using Weighted Interactions
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00279.x is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00197.x is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
@whedon invite @jni as editor
👋 @jni would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS? I realized that #3103 might be a better fit for @cMadan.
@jni has been invited to edit this submission.
@whedon assign me as editor
OK, the editor is @jni
Hi @justinshenk,
Thanks for your submission. While I look for reviewers (feel free to suggest any here, without @-mentioning them), could you please:
a) fix the references in the paper as suggested by this comment from our bot, b) make sure you cite appropriate papers for any software you use. For example, I don't see citations for matplotlib, seaborn, or NumPy, all of which I think your software uses directly? And, c) re-work the paper to move most of the content, which discusses the API in details, to the documentation? The paper should contain a succinct, high-level description of the software's functionality, not details of the API. For more, please read the "What should my paper contain section of our documentation.
Thank you!
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@whedon check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00020 is OK
- 10.25080/majora-92bf1922-00a is OK
- 10.1111/eth.12739 is OK
- 10.4103/0976-500X.72351 is OK
- 10.1161/01.str.30.12.2752 is OK
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541128 is OK
- 10.1021/ac60214a047 is OK
- 10.3390/s19153274 is OK
- 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.149 is OK
- 10.2147/DDDT.S56071 is OK
- 10.1186/s40462-017-0097-x is OK
- 10.1155/2016/6846721 is OK
- 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.185 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.09.038 is OK
- 10.1098/rsif.2017.0885 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-018-32949-3 is OK
- 10.1007/s10182-017-0302-7 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-018-32949-3 is OK
- 10.1109/ISM.2008.115 is OK
- 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591745 is OK
- 10.1007/BF00379695 is OK
- 10.1007/s10462-018-9619-1 is OK
- 10.1553/giscience2019_01_s54 is OK
- 10.1214/aoms/1177703732 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.06.004 is OK
- 10.1007/s10651-006-0015-7 is OK
- 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.018 is OK
- 10.1145/3159652.3159671 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0220751 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005115 is OK
- 10.1145/2743025 is OK
- 10.3390/nu11102430 is OK
- 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01454 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0211063 is OK
- 10.1109/cvprw.2019.00359 is OK
- 10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00103-3 is OK
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.12.005 is OK
- 10.1111/eth.12739 is OK
- 10.1101/345132 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.02.001 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.01.010 is OK
- 10.5607/en.2014.23.1.104 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.035 is OK
- 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00530-3 is OK
- 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.06.023 is OK
- 10.1016/S0165-0270(99)00156-9 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.12.016 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.004 is OK
- 10.1109/seaa.2018.00018 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a is OK
- 10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.755 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3509134 is OK
- 10.1186/s40462-019-0177-1 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412 is OK
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541128 is OK
- 10.3791/2423 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-0123-7_17 is OK
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1206-09.2009 is OK
- 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00279.x is OK
- 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2004.00064.x is OK
- 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.07.015 is OK
- 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.006 is OK
- 10.1186/1743-0003-2-20 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-540-74553-2_44 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.592845 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00197.x is OK
- 10.1007/s10182-017-0302-7 is OK
- 10.1093/brain/119.2.551 is OK
- 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90545-4 is OK
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5692-07.2008 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0202505 is OK
- 10.7150/thno.17559 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.004 is OK
- 10.1016/j.coisb.2017.07.012 is OK
- 10.1111/jnc.14213 is OK
- 10.1145/2743025 is OK
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.12.005 is OK
- 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.9892.2 is OK
- 10.1038/nature19356 is OK
- 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00139.2006 is OK
- 10.1002/9780470942390.mo140229 is OK
- 10.1038/ncb437 is OK
- 10.3758/BF03195394 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.0809053106 is OK
- 10.1038/ncomms1064 is OK
- 10.1016/s0047-6374(01)00324-4 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.001 is OK
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.01.004 is OK
- 10.1038/sc.2010.128 is OK
- 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.07.015 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2016.00042 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.12.016 is OK
- 10.5607/en.2014.23.1.104 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.035 is OK
- 10.1038/srep16171 is OK
- 10.4018/978-1-7998-5101-1.ch001 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2020.00518 is OK
- 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00868 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1109/cvprw.2019.00358 may be a valid DOI for title: Peeking into the Future: Predicting Future Person Activities and Locations in Videos
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Hi @justinshenk,
Thanks for your submission. While I look for reviewers (feel free to suggest any here, without @-mentioning them), could you please:
a) fix the references in the paper as suggested by this comment from our bot, b) make sure you cite appropriate papers for any software you use. For example, I don't see citations for matplotlib, seaborn, or NumPy, all of which I think your software uses directly? And, c) re-work the paper to move most of the content, which discusses the API in details, to the documentation? The paper should contain a succinct, high-level description of the software's functionality, not details of the API. For more, please read the "What should my paper contain section of our documentation.
Thank you!
Hi @jni, Thanks for your helpful comments! The paper has been updated as requested, with API documentation removed and links fixed.
Looking forward to your further review.
Great, thank you! Still looking for reviewers but I have one promising and one open lead. 🤞
Thanks everyone for your patience — almost there...! 😬
@whedon assign @a-paxton as reviewer
OK, @a-paxton is now a reviewer
@whedon add @abigailmcgovern as reviewer
OK, @abigailmcgovern is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3202.
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Did you mean to do this here instead of on #3202, @justinshenk?
Good catch. Thank you for reminding me of the new location!
Submitting author: @justinshenk (Justin Shenk) Repository: https://github.com/traja-team/traja Version: v0.2.5 Editor: @jni Reviewers: @a-paxton, @abigailmcgovern Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @justinshenk. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@justinshenk if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: