search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
725 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: `bwsample`: Processing Best-Worst Scaling data #3112

Closed whedon closed 3 years ago

whedon commented 3 years ago

Submitting author: @ulf1 (Ulf Hamster) Repository: https://github.com/satzbeleg/bwsample Version: 0.6.0 Editor: @mikldk Reviewers: @ejhigson, @jakryd Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ulf1. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ulf1 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 3 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
whedon commented 3 years ago 
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.08 s (390.5 files/s, 58606.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          19            432            757           1348
Markdown                         3             85              0            230
Jupyter Notebook                 3              0           1377            108
TeX                              1              7              0             94
YAML                             3              5              0             42
JSON                             1              0              0             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            30            529           2134           1840
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository '4057eae9665580b1e86a204f' was
gathered on 2021/03/14.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
UH                              58          3475            938          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
UH                         2537           73.0          0.4                7.45
whedon commented 3 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1177/074391569201100202 is OK
- 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8 is OK
- 10.1214/aos/1079120141 is OK
- 10.31219/osf.io/qkxej is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
whedon commented 3 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

arfon commented 3 years ago

Thanks for your submission to JOSS @ulf1. Unfortunately all of our editors in this area are very busy right now so I've added this paper to the waitlist.

ulf1 commented 3 years ago

Hello @arfon I moved the repository into a new organisation but couldn't change URL anymore. The new location is https://github.com/satzbeleg/bwsample Is there a way to change the path?

arfon commented 3 years ago

Is there a way to change the path?

Yep, I've gone ahead and done that for you.

danielskatz commented 3 years ago

👋 @mikldk - Would you be able to edit this submission? It might be a little outside of your core area, but it's been waiting a while, and I think you might be able to handle it.

danielskatz commented 3 years ago

@whedon invite @mikldk as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

@mikldk has been invited to edit this submission.

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@whedon assign me as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, the editor is @mikldk

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@ulf1 - thank you for the submission.

Do you have any suggestions for reviewers (here is a list of potential reviewers)?

ulf1 commented 3 years ago

Hello @mikldk maybe rasbt, desilinguist, ahurriyetoglu, betatim, yxoos, or apiad

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@rasbt, @desilinguist: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

desilinguist commented 3 years ago

If this can wait until first week of June, I can probably do it.

rasbt commented 3 years ago

Sorry, I currently have a large backlog of reviews (JOSE, ICCV, and upcoming NeurIPS) in the next weeks/months and shouldn't add more to my plate right now. I am happy to check back mid-July though in case an additional reviewer is needed

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@ahurriyetoglu, @betatim: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@yxoos, @apiad: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

amirhszd commented 3 years ago

I am caught up with schoolwork, sorry!

Amirhossein Hassanzadeh

Ph.D. Candidate Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science Rochester Institute of Technology, NY, 14623, USA Email: @.*** Tel: 585-771-0680

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:35 AM Mikkel Meyer Andersen < @.***> wrote:

@yxoos https://github.com/yxoos, @apiad https://github.com/apiad: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software https://joss.theoj.org/? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3112#issuecomment-847831104, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIRXWOZ64S44A4KFQWUM7BDTPOKQNANCNFSM4ZFKBV7Q .

apiad commented 3 years ago

I'm glad to review, but in the next couple of weeks I'm gonna be busy, so I'll do it slowly if that's OK.

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@stsievert, @ejhigson: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

ejhigson commented 3 years ago

I'm happy to review this!

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@whedon assign @ejhigson as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @ejhigson is now a reviewer

stsievert commented 3 years ago

My apologies @mikldk, but I'll have to decline. I don't have the bandwidth right now.

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@GregoryAshton: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

GregoryAshton commented 3 years ago

Hi @mikldk, I'm not able to commit to reviews at the moment due to other commitments. I'll be available in a month or so. Apologies.

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@jakryd: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

jakryd commented 3 years ago

Hello @mikldk, I would be happy to.

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @jakryd as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @jakryd is now a reviewer

mikldk commented 3 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3324.