search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: PERFORM: A Python package for developing reduced-order models for reacting fluid flows #3184

Closed whedon closed 3 years ago

whedon commented 3 years ago

Submitting author: @cwentland0 (Christopher Wentland) Repository: https://github.com/cwentland0/perform Version: v0.1 Editor: @kyleniemeyer Reviewers: @clemaitre58, @Himscipy Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cwentland0. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @jedbrown.

@cwentland0 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 3 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
whedon commented 3 years ago 
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.44 s (183.2 files/s, 18877.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          49           1383           1168           3808
reStructuredText                23            529            696            571
Markdown                         5             43              0             55
Bourne Shell                     2             14              8             46
make                             1              4              6             10
TeX                              1              0              0              7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            81           1973           1878           4497
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository 'fb8371d87a8713aa26198609' was
gathered on 2021/04/17.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Ashish S Nair                   14          2181            996            7.30
chris                          130         22631          17703           92.70

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
chris                      6359           28.1          1.4               14.29
whedon commented 3 years ago

PDF failed to compile for issue #3184 with the following error: 

 Can't find any papers to compile :-(
kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

@whedon generate pdf from branch paper

whedon commented 3 years ago 
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch paper. Reticulating splines etc...
kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

@whedon assign @kyleniemeyer as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, the editor is @kyleniemeyer

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

Hi @cwentland0, thanks for your interest in JOSS! This actually looks up my alley, so I'm going to serve as editor. We'll use this pre-review issue to find and assign reviewers, which I'll be doing in the coming week.

whedon commented 3 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

cwentland0 commented 3 years ago

@kyleniemeyer Sounds great! Thanks for taking this up, I appreciate it.

arfon commented 3 years ago

@cwentland0 – could you take a look a this list of potential reviewers and identify a few people who would be good candidates to review this submission?

cwentland0 commented 3 years ago

Hi @arfon, here are a few names: clemaitre58 szkafander tupi Himscipy highlando bonh

These reviewers indicated Python as a preferred programming language, and made some reference to computational fluid dynamics and machine learning/data-driven methods in their preferred domains/topics. If figure that combo might fit best.

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

Thanks @cwentland0! Sorry for letting this one lag. I'll be sending out some review requests shortly.

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

Hi @clemaitre58 and @tupi, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

clemaitre58 commented 3 years ago

ok

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:05 PM Kyle Niemeyer @.***> wrote:

Hi @clemaitre58 https://github.com/clemaitre58 and @tupi https://github.com/tupi, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3184#issuecomment-866295533, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD2XBUZIL3C6ZY2F6VXUQ23TUDUG7ANCNFSM43COQT4Q .

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @clemaitre58 as reviewer

Thanks @clemaitre58! Once we find a second reviewer, I will initiate the actual review issue. In the meantime, you can see our reviewer guidelines here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @clemaitre58 is now a reviewer

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

Hello @Himscipy, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? If you haven't reviewed for us before, we follow a checklist-based approach in the open here on GitHub: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Himscipy commented 3 years ago

Hi @kyleniemeyer, Thanks for the review invite. The work fit well with my background and I can surely review it.

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @Himscipy as reviewer

Great, thank you!

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @Himscipy is now a reviewer

kyleniemeyer commented 3 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3428.