Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.23 s (307.3 files/s, 19138.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 61 566 520 2216
Markdown 5 102 0 348
TeX 1 5 0 164
Jupyter Notebook 1 0 330 88
YAML 1 7 0 41
Bourne Shell 2 4 21 10
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 71 684 871 2867
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '530daf049251f652305208f6' was
gathered on 2021/05/05.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Adam Day 32 2446 171 66.32
Andy Hails 21 1159 137 32.84
aday 4 19 12 0.79
andyleanlibrary 1 1 1 0.05
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Adam Day 2362 96.6 2.6 13.12
Andy Hails 920 79.4 1.6 2.61
aday 19 100.0 1.4 5.26
andyleanlibrary 1 100.0 2.1 0.00
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1002/bjs.6880 is OK
- 10.1007/s00134-018-5407-2 is OK
- 10.3138/W706-5884-KG84-J282 is OK
- 10.1111/anae.13829 is OK
- 10.23876/j.krcp.20.392 is OK
- 10.1177/0011392116663807 is OK
- 10.1093/ije/dyz187 is OK
- 10.1186/s41073-017-0031-1 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
PDF failed to compile for issue #3251 with the following error:
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:72:in `block in build_affiliation_string': Problem with affiliations for Andrew Hails, perhaps the affiliations index need quoting? (RuntimeError)
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:71:in `each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:71:in `build_affiliation_string'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:17:in `initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:205:in `new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:205:in `block in parse_authors'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:202:in `each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:202:in `parse_authors'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:93:in `initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in `new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in `set_paper'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:58:in `prepare'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in `run'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in `invoke_command'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor.rb:387:in `dispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in `start'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:131:in `<top (required)>'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `load'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `<main>'
Note that this is a resubmission of #2840.
Hi @ad48 and thanks for your submission. Unfortunately I've needed to add it to a backlog of submissions since our editors in the relevant areas are overburdened currently. Thank you for your patience. In the meantime, could you take a look at the paper compilation errors?
Hi @kthyng , yes I will take a look. It's odd, we had the same issue last time and it seems to compile ok when we use the tool provided.
I noticed that our affiliation contains an apostrophe. Guessing this is the source of the problem if it's interpreted as a quote. I have now put the affiliation into double quotes to avoid ambiguity. Again, paper appears to compile correctly at https://whedon.theoj.org/ Is there anything more to do just now? Please let me know.
@whedon generate pdf
PDF failed to compile for issue #3251 with the following error:
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:72:in `block in build_affiliation_string': Problem with affiliations for Andrew Hails, perhaps the affiliations index need quoting? (RuntimeError)
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:71:in `each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:71:in `build_affiliation_string'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:17:in `initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:205:in `new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:205:in `block in parse_authors'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:202:in `each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:202:in `parse_authors'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:93:in `initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in `new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in `set_paper'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:58:in `prepare'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in `run'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in `invoke_command'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor.rb:387:in `dispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in `start'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:131:in `<top (required)>'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `load'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `<main>'
@whedon generate pdf
PDF failed to compile for issue #3251 with the following error:
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:72:in `block in build_affiliation_string': Problem with affiliations for Andrew Hails, perhaps the affiliations index need quoting? (RuntimeError)
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:71:in `each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:71:in `build_affiliation_string'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:17:in `initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:205:in `new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:205:in `block in parse_authors'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:202:in `each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:202:in `parse_authors'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:93:in `initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in `new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in `set_paper'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:58:in `prepare'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in `run'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in `invoke_command'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor.rb:387:in `dispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in `start'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:131:in `<top (required)>'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `load'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `<main>'
@whedon generate pdf
PDF failed to compile for issue #3251 with the following error:
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:72:in `block in build_affiliation_string': Problem with affiliations for Andrew Hails, perhaps the affiliations index need quoting? (RuntimeError)
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:71:in `each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:71:in `build_affiliation_string'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:17:in `initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:205:in `new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:205:in `block in parse_authors'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:202:in `each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:202:in `parse_authors'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon.rb:93:in `initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in `new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in `set_paper'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:58:in `prepare'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in `run'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in `invoke_command'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor.rb:387:in `dispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in `start'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/bin/whedon:131:in `<top (required)>'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `load'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `<main>'
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@sbenthall could you edit this submission?
@whedon invite @sbenthall as editor
@sbenthall has been invited to edit this submission.
I'll go ahead and take this one
@whedon assign me as editor
OK, the editor is @danielskatz
π @ad48 - if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
π @jodischneider - Would you (or someone in your group) be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
π @jasonpriem, @hpiwowar, @mfenner - Would one of you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Sorry Dan, @jasonpriem and I are swamped right now and not able to do any reviews.
@hpiwowar - thanks for the quick response in any case
Hi @danielskatz Thanks for helping with our submission. We will take a look at the list and get back to you.
I can review.
@danielskatz I looked at the spreadsheet and found these names who seem like they would have the right skills and interests.
-- Bibliometrics + Python gagolews (there are a few others with Bibliometrics / Scientometrics in their skills, but not Python)
-- ScholComms + Python dhimmel
-- NLP + Python bagheria indika.kahanda at montana (the NLP in our application is very basic, so on the one hand a reviewer with NLP skills might help improve it, on the other they might not find much of interest, so I'm not sure if this is the right way to go)
Thanks @mfenner - I'll add you, but we won't start the review (which will happen in a new issue) until we find one more reviewer as well.
@whedon assign @mfenner as reviewer
OK, @mfenner is now a reviewer
π @gagolews, @dhimmel - Would one of you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
I accept!
great, thanks! - I'll add you and we'll get started
@whedon add @dhimmel as reviewer
OK, @dhimmel is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3348.
Sorry, I'm overbooked - but feel free to ask me for another scholcomm project in the future, or if you lose a quorum of reviewers on this one!
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 1:31 PM Daniel S. Katz @.***> wrote:
π @jodischneider https://github.com/jodischneider - Would you (or someone in your group) be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
β You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3251#issuecomment-856999586, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADVGZUDDEMAGN2PS2QIN4TTRZOZ7ANCNFSM44FADMRA .
Apologies, extremely busy atm too.
Submitting author: @ad48 (Adam Day) Repository: https://github.com/sagepublishing/rejected_article_tracker_pkg Version: 1.5.0 Editor: @danielskatz Reviewers: @mfenner, @dhimmel Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ad48. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @danielskatz.
@ad48 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: