Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.39 s (168.8 files/s, 22716.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 39 1170 1566 3968
TeX 1 42 0 633
Markdown 6 67 0 368
reStructuredText 6 190 93 301
YAML 9 33 0 272
CSS 1 16 0 78
make 1 8 5 30
TOML 1 2 0 28
INI 1 0 0 8
HTML 1 0 0 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 66 1528 1664 5692
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository 'eda8ab67fa51b87a14d98be8' was
gathered on 2021/05/05.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Adrian Price-Whelan 5 33 18 0.01
Arjun Savel 18 220 24 0.03
Christina Hedges 5 91 82 0.02
Dan F-M 560 165043 316130 58.16
Dan Foreman-Mackey 36 3538 176542 21.77
Eric Agol 1 1 1 0.00
Ian Czekala 5 115 23 0.02
Luke Bouma 1 13 9 0.00
Rodrigo Luger 10 164894 273 19.96
Timothy D Brandt 1 254 0 0.03
Tom Barclay 1 1 1 0.00
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Adrian Price-Whelan 1 3.0 12.4 0.00
Arjun Savel 52 23.6 5.2 5.77
Christina Hedges 38 41.8 2.1 7.89
Dan F-M 135 0.1 8.5 74.07
Dan Foreman-Mackey 6173 174.5 18.2 11.45
Eric Agol 1 100.0 0.2 100.00
Ian Czekala 70 60.9 23.8 14.29
Luke Bouma 13 100.0 10.0 0.00
Rodrigo Luger 221 0.1 19.7 9.95
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.5281/zenodo.1998447 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4695331 is OK
- 10.7717/peerj-cs.55 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01143 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stt1435 is OK
- 10.1093/mnrasl/slt075 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf22f is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/aae8e5 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/ab4fee is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9332 is OK
- 10.3847/2515-5172/aaaf6c is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201118085 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stz2870 is OK
- 10.1086/669497 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stz2688 is OK
- 10.1086/683602 is OK
- 10.1088/1538-3873/aaaaa8 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/ab6663 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201628579 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/sty2472 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv894 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stz3251 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/abc686 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/abbc16 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v076.i01 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/aba4b2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2400-z is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stx138 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.3847/1538-4365/abe70e may be a valid DOI for title: Allesfitter: Flexible Star and Exoplanet Inference From Photometry and Radial Velocity
- 10.3847/1538-4357/abebe3 may be a valid DOI for title: A coplanar circumbinary protoplanetary disk in the TWA 3 triple M dwarf system
INVALID DOIs
- None
Potential reviewers from the list include nespinoza
, benjaminpope
, jbrande
, grburgess
, and hpparvi
.
@xuanxu would you be able to edit this submission? If you need time to wrap up the other submissions you are handling first I can waitlist this for now. Also @arfon you were suggested as editor I believe. However since you have a lot on your plate I take it you cannot take this on too?
@whedon assign me as editor
:+1: I can take this.
OK, the editor is @arfon
:wave: @benjaminpope and @grburgess - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
The submission under review here is exoplanet: Gradient-based probabilistic inference forexoplanet data & other astronomical time series.
@arfon I can review. Cheers.
@whedon assign @grburgess as reviewer
OK, @grburgess is now a reviewer
@grburgess - thanks so much! I would like to wait until I've found a second reviewer here before moving this to the full review issue (with checklists etc.), so please sit tight for a little while.
:wave: @jbrande @nespinoza - would either of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
The submission under review here is exoplanet: Gradient-based probabilistic inference forexoplanet data & other astronomical time series.
Sorry I just saw this - I for some reason didn't get a notification to my email. I'd be happy to.
⚡ thanks @benjaminpope!
@whedon add @benjaminpope as reviewer
OK, @benjaminpope is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3285.
@grburgess, @benjaminpope - many thanks for agreeing to review this submission for JOSS. See you over in #3285 where the actual review will take place.
Submitting author: @dfm (Daniel Foreman-Mackey) Repository: https://github.com/exoplanet-dev/exoplanet Version: v0.5.0 Editor: @arfon Reviewers: @grburgess, @benjaminpope Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @dfm. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@dfm if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: