openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
725 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: Lcopt - An interactive tool for creating fully parameterised Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) foreground models #335

Closed whedon closed 7 years ago

whedon commented 7 years ago

Submitting author: @pjamesjoyce (P. James Joyce) Repository: https://github.com/pjamesjoyce/lcopt Version: v0.4.0 Editor: @katyhuff Reviewer: @amoeba

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @pjamesjoyce. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@pjamesjoyce if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 7 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS. @katyhuff it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
arfon commented 7 years ago

👋 @katyhuff - the submitting author suggested you as an editor.

pjamesjoyce commented 7 years ago

Hi all, perhaps @amoeba (who reviewed the Brightway LCA software #236) would be an option to review if they have time?

katyhuff commented 7 years ago

@amoeba would you be willing to review this submission? You did a great job with the Brigthway2 paper! I hope you'll let me know if you can take this on.

Alternatively, @cmutel, you might also be a great reviewer for this submission. I recognize that, given the relationship of this submission to Brightway2, I can imagine you may have a conflict of interest. However, if you feel you can give an unconflicted review, I think the submission would benefit from someone with a strong knowledge of this software. Please let me know if you could give an unconflicted review and would be willing to do so.

amoeba commented 7 years ago

@katyhuff Sure. I can look at this this weekend or earlier. I would love it if @cmutel could at least comment on the correctness of this software, which I can't do confidently due to my lack of experience with LCA. I'm happy to be the reviewer though.

katyhuff commented 7 years ago

@whedon assign @amoeba as reviewer

whedon commented 7 years ago

OK, the reviewer is @amoeba

katyhuff commented 7 years ago

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

whedon commented 7 years ago

You didn't say the magic word! Try this:

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas
katyhuff commented 7 years ago

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

whedon commented 7 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/339. Feel free to close this issue now!

katyhuff commented 7 years ago

Thanks @amoeba ! You're assigned as the reviewer. Now you (and, if willing to help, @cmutel) can conduct this review over in #339. Please let me know if you have any questions!

cmutel commented 7 years ago

Thanks for the invite - I would be able to do this, but only after returning from vacation on August 8th.