Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.04 s (1046.5 files/s, 129444.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript 32 621 173 3716
CSS 3 60 2 416
HTML 2 13 0 220
Markdown 1 12 0 31
Bourne Shell 2 0 0 27
DOS Batch 2 0 0 27
SVG 1 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 43 706 175 4438
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '5dd976596eb34769f3b69782' was
gathered on 2021/06/14.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Klevis 135 8091 3929 97.00
Klevis Aliaj 5 360 12 3.00
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Klevis Aliaj 4510 1252.8 6.9 3.84
PDF failed to compile for issue #3367 with the following error:
Can't find any papers to compile :-(
@whedon check references from branch joos
Attempting to check references... from custom branch joos
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.042 is OK
- 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00032-4 is OK
- 10.1115/1.2894884 is OK
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.05.004 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.031 is OK
- 10.2106/jbjs.g.01483 is OK
- 10.1007/s11517-018-1903-3 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon generate pdf from branch joos
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joos. Reticulating splines etc...
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
👋 @heath-henninger - thanks for your submission.
Due to a current shortage of editors (that we are working to resolve), I'm going to put it on our waiting list until an appropriate editor is available.
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands
# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors
# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers
EDITORIAL TASKS
# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf
# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name
# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references
# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository
Possible reviewers for Javascript motion analysis/biomechanics/robotics applications.
Great fit of language and domains: mosteo adi3 jizecn destogl CameronDevine akuederle nnadeau
OK fit of language and domains: dhrubajyoti98 thelinuxmaniac dglmoore sixpearls ixjlyons malmaud Jgoldfar
@whedon invite @adi3 as editor
:wave: @adi3 – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS? (Last invite for now I promise!)
@adi3 has been invited to edit this submission.
@whedon assign @adi3 as editor
OK, the editor is @adi3
Hi @heath-henninger, I will be the editor for this paper.
To get things going, could you please suggest 5-6 reviewers from this list that you consider appropriate to vet this paper? While selecting, you should confirm that the domain expertise of the reviewer matches the subject matter of your paper and software.
Thank you!
Already included this a few posts prior. I even had you as a great fit for review! Possible reviewers for Javascript motion analysis/biomechanics/robotics applications.
Great fit of language and domains: mosteo adi3 (if you really want to :-) jizecn destogl CameronDevine akuederle nnadeau
OK fit of language and domains: dhrubajyoti98 thelinuxmaniac dglmoore sixpearls ixjlyons malmaud Jgoldfar
@heath-henninger Missed that, thank you! Let me try finding a couple of other reviewers and if we are unable to do so, I'll be happy to act as one of the reviewers as well
@mosteo @jizecn @destogl @CameronDevine @akuederle @nnadeau - Would any of you be interested in reviewing this paper on robotics? I'd greatly appreciate your help!
I am working to finish up my PhD, so I will have to pass on this one.
I'm unfortunately fully booked for the foreseeable future, my apologies.
@sixpearls @ixjlyons @malmaud @Jgoldfar @dhrubajyoti98 @thelinuxmaniac @dglmoore @jizecn @destogl @AKuederle @nnadeau - Can any of you please help review this paper? We'd greatly appreciate your contribution!
I can review
Hey there Adi - this looks like interesting work; unfortunately, I will not be able to review for JOSS during my next contract period. If there is a way to re-engage after that time, I will definitely reach out. Best!
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 12:52 PM Adi Singh @.***> wrote:
@sixpearls https://github.com/sixpearls @ixjlyons https://github.com/ixjlyons @malmaud https://github.com/malmaud @jgoldfar https://github.com/jgoldfar @dhrubajyoti98 https://github.com/dhrubajyoti98 @thelinuxmaniac https://github.com/thelinuxmaniac @dglmoore https://github.com/dglmoore @jizecn https://github.com/jizecn @destogl https://github.com/destogl @AKuederle https://github.com/AKuederle @nnadeau https://github.com/nnadeau - Can any of you please help review this paper? We'd greatly appreciate your contribution!
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3367#issuecomment-874302364, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKORGMZVY3ANHQNG7MO72LTWIERRANCNFSM46VEILCA .
-- Best, Jonathan Goldfarb +1 (321) 895 4184
@nnadeau - awesome! Thank you!
@whedon assign @nnadeau as reviewer
@adi3 - commands to @whedon have to be the first thing in a comment - ☝️ didn't work
@whedon assign @nnadeau as reviewer
OK, @nnadeau is now a reviewer
@adi3 What's the Deadline for the review? I am next few weeks on vacation. I could submit the review mid August
@destogl we can definitely shoot for a mid-August completion to work around your vacation plans. I'll assign you as a reviewer and kickstart the review. You can get around to it whenever you're ready.
@whedon assign @destogl as reviewer
OK, @destogl is now a reviewer
@whedon add @nnadeau as reviewer
OK, @nnadeau is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3490.
Submitting author: @heath-henninger (Heath Henninger) Repository: https://github.com/klevis-a/kinematics-vis.git Version: v.1.0.0 Editor: @adi3 Reviewers: @destogl, @nnadeau Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @heath-henninger. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@heath-henninger if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: