Closed whedon closed 2 years ago
@heath-henninger yes, the DOI will be published in the manuscript. I believe I have everything from your side now to push this to publication.
@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.5781772 as archive
OK. 10.5281/zenodo.5781772 is the archive.
@whedon set v0.2.0 as version
OK. v0.2.0 is the version.
@whedon recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
PDF failed to compile for issue #3490 with the following error:
Can't find any papers to compile :-(
@whedon recommend-accept from branch joos
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.042 is OK
- 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00032-4 is OK
- 10.1115/1.2894884 is OK
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.05.004 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.031 is OK
- 10.2106/jbjs.g.01483 is OK
- 10.1007/s11517-018-1903-3 is OK
- 10.1109/TBME.2007.901024 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1036/1097-8542.245400 may be a valid DOI for title: Euler angles
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/joss-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/2838
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/2838, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true from branch joos
@whedon accept deposit=true from branch joos
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
@destogl, @nnadeau – many thanks for your reviews here and to @adi3 for editing this submission! JOSS relies upon the volunteer effort of people like you and we simply wouldn't be able to do this without you ✨
@heath-henninger – your paper is now accepted and published in JOSS :zap::rocket::boom:
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03490/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03490)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03490">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03490/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03490/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03490
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Thank you @arfon and thank you @adi3! Working through the review process for JOSS has been cool. I very much enjoyed the transparency and automation. I am thankful for the acceptance and for all the hard work everyone has put into the journal.
@destogl, @nnadeau thank you for taking the time to review the manuscript and software, and for your feedback!
Submitting author: @heath-henninger (Heath Henninger) Repository: https://github.com/klevis-a/kinematics-vis.git Version: v0.2.0 Editor: @adi3 Reviewer: @destogl, @nnadeau Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.5781772
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@destogl & @nnadeau, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @adi3 know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Review checklist for @destogl
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @nnadeau
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper