[PRE REVIEW]: BFClust: a python package for pangenome clustering with confidence scores

[whedon]

Submitting author: @dsurujon (Defne Surujon) Repository: https://github.com/dsurujon/BFClust-python Version: 0.1.26 Editor: Pending Reviewer: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1620e161877ad5ac45826f3108371685"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1620e161877ad5ac45826f3108371685/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1620e161877ad5ac45826f3108371685/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1620e161877ad5ac45826f3108371685)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @dsurujon. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@dsurujon if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1093/nar/gkx977 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 is OK
- 10.1093/gigascience/giz119 is OK
- 10.1186/S13059-020-02090-4 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000231 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (278.8 files/s, 18960.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          10            119             34            458
Markdown                         2             41              0            119
TeX                              1              9              0             91
YAML                             1              1              0             80
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            14            170             34            748
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository 'c25ec614a295435c50e5767b' was
gathered on 2021/07/17.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Defne                            8          1051            445          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Defne                       611           58.1          0.7                6.55

[whedon]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[danielskatz]

👋 @dsurujon - thanks for your submission. Due to the relatively small amount of code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. You should hear back in a week or so.

[danielskatz]

@whedon query scope

[whedon]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[dsurujon]

@danielskatz thanks for the heads up, looking forward to hearing back

[danielskatz]

@dsurujon - I'm sorry to say that after discussion amongst the JOSS editors, we have decided that this submission does not meet the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages for other suggestions for how you might receive credit for your work.

[danielskatz]

@whedon reject

[whedon]

Paper rejected.