Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1611
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.23 s (485.6 files/s, 156703.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 75 2759 4099 10589
JavaScript 8 2166 2178 8618
CSS 4 323 42 1026
reStructuredText 3 416 672 992
HTML 3 340 6 543
TeX 1 21 0 389
YAML 4 8 2 349
Markdown 6 41 0 115
DOS Batch 1 8 1 27
Dockerfile 1 12 0 26
Bourne Shell 4 4 17 10
make 1 4 6 10
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 111 6102 7023 22694
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository 'eda0f32c87ed35d77a7a9abd' was
gathered on 2021/08/04.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
AKUMAR0019 52 5086 3571 15.10
Al 2 326 39 0.64
Al Crowely 2 451 144 1.04
Al Crowley 27 4134 958 8.88
Ashmita Kumar 16 1615 329 3.39
David Keator 295 28591 7923 63.69
Dorota Jarecka 25 436 971 2.45
Michael Hanke 1 19 12 0.05
Nazek Queder 1 1 1 0.00
Sanu Ann 6 2380 113 4.35
Satrajit Ghosh 5 75 23 0.17
Tom Gillespie 1 2 1 0.01
Tristan Glatard 5 65 7 0.13
dorota 1 4 3 0.01
maxbachmann 1 2 2 0.01
natachaperez 1 45 2 0.08
tiborauer 1 2 2 0.01
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
AKUMAR0019 3082 60.6 1.5 6.91
Al 94 28.8 20.9 1.06
Al Crowley 3661 88.6 15.5 7.27
David Keator 20815 72.8 31.7 20.12
Dorota Jarecka 346 79.4 44.7 12.72
Sanu Ann 2297 96.5 38.0 10.19
Satrajit Ghosh 54 72.0 43.5 11.11
Tristan Glatard 26 40.0 45.3 23.08
dorota 4 100.0 35.4 25.00
tiborauer 2 100.0 23.1 0.00
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.102 may be a valid DOI for title: Sharing brain mapping statistical results with the neuroimaging data model
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.094 may be a valid DOI for title: Towards structured sharing of raw and derived neuroimaging data across existing resources
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@AKUMAR0019 Thanks for this submission to JOSS. I will be reviewing this work for scope and will look for a handling editor. In the mean time can you check those DOI's :point_up:.
You can call the following to update the paper:
whedon generate pdf
@emdupre this looks like something you might be able to handle but I have waitlisted
this submission for now since you seem to be at capacity in terms of handling submission. Let me know if once you available this is something you could help with. Thanks.
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@AKUMAR0019 Thanks for this submission to JOSS. I will be reviewing this work for scope and will look for a handling editor. In the mean time can you check those DOI's ☝️.
You can call the following to update the paper:
whedon generate pdf
Thank you so much! Those DOIs were correct, and I will have whedon update the paper.
@whedon commands
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands
# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors
# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers
EDITORIAL TASKS
# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf
# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name
# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references
# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository
@whedon check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.102 may be a valid DOI for title: Sharing brain mapping statistical results with the neuroimaging data model
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.094 may be a valid DOI for title: Towards structured sharing of raw and derived neuroimaging data across existing resources
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.102 may be a valid DOI for title: Sharing brain mapping statistical results with the neuroimaging data model
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.094 may be a valid DOI for title: Towards structured sharing of raw and derived neuroimaging data across existing resources
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.102 may be a valid DOI for title: Sharing brain mapping statistical results with the neuroimaging data model
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.094 may be a valid DOI for title: Towards structured sharing of raw and derived neuroimaging data across existing resources
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon check references
Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:
Failed to parse BibTeX on value "month" (NAME) [#
@whedon check references
Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:
Failed to parse BibTeX on value "month" (NAME) [#
@whedon check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.102 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.094 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
I'm sorry for all of the comments! I wasn't sure how to test the paper, so I used whedon.
@emdupre this looks like something you might be able to handle but I have waitlisted this submission for now since you seem to be at capacity in terms of handling submission. Let me know if once you available this is something you could help with. Thanks.
Thanks for the thought, @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman ! I am at capacity right now but would be happy to take this on as things move off my docket in the next few weeks. I'll flag, though, that I work directly with one of the co-authors (Poline) and so have a COI on this submission. Let me know how you'd like to proceed !
I'm sorry for all of the comments! I wasn't sure how to test the paper, so I used whedon.
Just to note that there's a Whedon preview service, if you haven't seen it already ! https://whedon.theoj.org
@emdupre Thanks. However, my apologies but given your perceived COI I will have to look for a different editor for this.
@fabian-s is this something your could help edit?
@whedon invite @fabian-s as editor
@fabian-s has been invited to edit this submission.
Sorry, I'd rather not -- I don't know Python, I don't do Neuroimaging.
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, I'd be happy to edit this submission.
@osorensen - feel free to assign this to yourself, using @whedon assign me as editor
(and feel free to do this going forward when you see something that is of interest to you, as long as it's not undergoing scope review)
@whedon assign @osorensen as editor
OK, the editor is @osorensen
@AKUMAR0019, I'm now the editor for this submission. If you know of any potential reviewers, please mention their GitHub username in this thread (without the leading @).
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@kasbohm, @devDonnn, @sealhuang, @snastase, @dr-xenia, would any of you be interested in reviewing this submission to the Journal of Open Source Software?
@whedon list reviewers
Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers
@AKUMAR0019, I'm now the editor for this submission. If you know of any potential reviewers, please mention their GitHub username in this thread (without the leading @).
Thank you @osorensen for agreeing to edit this paper!
A list of potential reviewers: robbisg htwangtw SRSteinkamp richford 62442katieb a3sha2 peerherholz Remi-Gau matteomancini dr-xenia mwegrzyn mih JonathanReardon sealhuang
@robbisg @htwangtw @JonathanReardon would any of you be interested in reviewing this submission to the Journal of Open Source Software?
@osorensen I am interested but I am only available after the 17th of August. Is that okay?
@htwangtw thanks, that's very ok!
@whedon add @htwangtw as reviewer
OK, @htwangtw is now a reviewer
I can review as well.
Submitting author: @AKUMAR0019 (Ashmita Kumar) Repository: https://github.com/AKUMAR0019/PyNIDM Version: v.3.8.2 Editor: @osorensen Reviewers: @htwangtw, @robbisg Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AKUMAR0019. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@AKUMAR0019 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: