Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1810
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=1.03 s (62.2 files/s, 111925.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML 2 0 0 93209
JSON 9 0 0 13084
JavaScript 46 651 600 7031
Markdown 2 89 0 254
TeX 1 12 0 119
YAML 2 2 0 47
Dockerfile 1 9 11 13
Bourne Shell 1 4 1 11
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 64 767 612 113768
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository 'e5293c12ec645182cd108def' was
gathered on 2021/09/11.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Christian Dallago 1 1 1 0.01
Jeffrey Wong 50 1575 454 7.83
Max Franz 78 6134 1702 30.23
jvwong 11 5653 5621 43.50
metincansiper 44 3681 1089 18.40
user 1 4 2 0.02
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Christian Dallago 1 100.0 21.2 0.00
Max Franz 4831 78.8 18.7 4.62
jvwong 1278 22.6 5.0 7.98
metincansiper 2171 59.0 21.0 12.67
user 1 25.0 22.6 0.00
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1101/2021.03.10.382333 may be a valid DOI for title: Capturing scientific knowledge in computable form
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1039 may be a valid DOI for title: Pathway Commons, a web resource for biological pathway data
- 10.1038/npre.2009.3212.1 may be a valid DOI for title: Reflect: augmented browsing for the life scientist
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn424 may be a valid DOI for title: The Synergizer service for translating gene, protein and other biological identifiers
- 10.1093/nar/gkg034 may be a valid DOI for title: STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins
- 10.1186/gb-2008-9-s1-s4 may be a valid DOI for title: GeneMANIA: a real-time multiple association network integration algorithm for predicting gene function
- 10.1093/nar/gkm226 may be a valid DOI for title: g: Profiler—a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments
- 10.1186/1471-2105-8-401 may be a valid DOI for title: The Protein Identifier Cross-Referencing (PICR) service: reconciling protein identifiers across multiple source databases
- 10.1093/nar/gkr1097 may be a valid DOI for title: Identifiers. org and MIRIAM Registry: community resources to provide persistent identification
- 10.1101/2021.03.30.437702 may be a valid DOI for title: Gene name errors: lessons not learned
- 10.1093/nar/gki031 may be a valid DOI for title: Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI
INVALID DOIs
- None
@maxkfranz thanks for this submission. I will be looking for a handling editor for this work. In the mean time can you work on fixing those references :point_up:. You can call @whedon generate pdf
here to update the paper and call @whedon check references
to check those DOI's. Thanks.
@whedon invite @galessiorob as editor
@galessiorob has been invited to edit this submission.
@galessiorob do you think you could edit this work? The editors in the domain of bioinformatics are currently handling many other submissions. Let me know if this works fits well enough with your data science background. Thanks
The suggested DOIs look correct to me. Thanks
@whedon check references
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Happy to take this one!
@maxkfranz I'll start reaching out to potential reviewers, but if you have any specific suggestions feel free to ping them here.
@whedon check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1101/2021.03.10.382333 may be a valid DOI for title: Capturing scientific knowledge in computable form
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1039 may be a valid DOI for title: Pathway Commons, a web resource for biological pathway data
- 10.1038/npre.2009.3212.1 may be a valid DOI for title: Reflect: augmented browsing for the life scientist
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn424 may be a valid DOI for title: The Synergizer service for translating gene, protein and other biological identifiers
- 10.1093/nar/gkg034 may be a valid DOI for title: STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins
- 10.1186/gb-2008-9-s1-s4 may be a valid DOI for title: GeneMANIA: a real-time multiple association network integration algorithm for predicting gene function
- 10.1093/nar/gkm226 may be a valid DOI for title: g: Profiler—a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments
- 10.1186/1471-2105-8-401 may be a valid DOI for title: The Protein Identifier Cross-Referencing (PICR) service: reconciling protein identifiers across multiple source databases
- 10.1093/nar/gkr1097 may be a valid DOI for title: Identifiers. org and MIRIAM Registry: community resources to provide persistent identification
- 10.1101/2021.03.30.437702 may be a valid DOI for title: Gene name errors: lessons not learned
- 10.1093/nar/gki031 may be a valid DOI for title: Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI
INVALID DOIs
- None
@maxkfranz if the suggested DOIs look good you can start adding them to the actual doc.
@whedon assign @galessiorob as editor
OK, the editor is @galessiorob
@maxkfranz if the suggested DOIs look good you can start adding them to the actual doc.
I thought this was automatic. Assuming you mean the bib file, I'll amend that. Thanks
@maxkfranz I'll start reaching out to potential reviewers, but if you have any specific suggestions feel free to ping them here.
Here are some suggestions:
@whedon check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1101/2021.03.10.382333 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1039 is OK
- 10.15252/msb.20177651 is OK
- 10.1038/npre.2009.3212.1 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn424 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkg034 is OK
- 10.1186/gb-2008-9-s1-s4 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkm226 is OK
- 10.1186/1471-2105-8-401 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkr1097 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.03.30.437702 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gki031 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon add @AlexanderPico as reviewer
OK, @AlexanderPico is now a reviewer
Other potential reviewers:
Thanks for the suggestions @maxkfranz, I have sent invites to all of them. I'll wait a few days for them to respond and as soon as we have at least two assigned reviewers we can start the process.
Thanks, @galessiorob
@whedon add @rabdill as reviewer
OK, @rabdill is now a reviewer
🎉 Thanks for volunteering to be reviewers @AlexanderPicoand @rabdill!
I'll generate a "review issue" that will contain individual checklists to go through, feel free to get started at your earliest convenience, don't hesitate to ask if you need clarification or help - you can @mention me directly on the issue.
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3756.
Submitting author: @maxkfranz (Max Franz) Repository: https://github.com/PathwayCommons/grounding-search Version: 0.6.0 Editor: @galessiorob Reviewers: @AlexanderPico, @rabdill Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @maxkfranz. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@maxkfranz if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: