openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: A flexible search system for high-accuracy identification of biological entities and molecules #3717

Closed whedon closed 3 years ago

whedon commented 3 years ago

Submitting author: @maxkfranz (Max Franz) Repository: https://github.com/PathwayCommons/grounding-search Version: 0.6.0 Editor: @galessiorob Reviewers: @AlexanderPico, @rabdill Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dfad3b1bc874b0f813f6814723a646f5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dfad3b1bc874b0f813f6814723a646f5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dfad3b1bc874b0f813f6814723a646f5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dfad3b1bc874b0f813f6814723a646f5)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @maxkfranz. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@maxkfranz if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 3 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
whedon commented 3 years ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1810

whedon commented 3 years ago
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=1.03 s (62.2 files/s, 111925.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML                              2              0              0          93209
JSON                             9              0              0          13084
JavaScript                      46            651            600           7031
Markdown                         2             89              0            254
TeX                              1             12              0            119
YAML                             2              2              0             47
Dockerfile                       1              9             11             13
Bourne Shell                     1              4              1             11
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            64            767            612         113768
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository 'e5293c12ec645182cd108def' was
gathered on 2021/09/11.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Christian Dallago                1             1              1            0.01
Jeffrey Wong                    50          1575            454            7.83
Max Franz                       78          6134           1702           30.23
jvwong                          11          5653           5621           43.50
metincansiper                   44          3681           1089           18.40
user                             1             4              2            0.02

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Christian Dallago             1          100.0         21.2                0.00
Max Franz                  4831           78.8         18.7                4.62
jvwong                     1278           22.6          5.0                7.98
metincansiper              2171           59.0         21.0               12.67
user                          1           25.0         22.6                0.00
whedon commented 3 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

whedon commented 3 years ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1101/2021.03.10.382333 may be a valid DOI for title: Capturing scientific knowledge in computable form
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1039 may be a valid DOI for title: Pathway Commons, a web resource for biological pathway data
- 10.1038/npre.2009.3212.1 may be a valid DOI for title: Reflect: augmented browsing for the life scientist
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn424 may be a valid DOI for title: The Synergizer service for translating gene, protein and other biological identifiers
- 10.1093/nar/gkg034 may be a valid DOI for title: STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins
- 10.1186/gb-2008-9-s1-s4 may be a valid DOI for title: GeneMANIA: a real-time multiple association network integration algorithm for predicting gene function
- 10.1093/nar/gkm226 may be a valid DOI for title: g: Profiler—a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments
- 10.1186/1471-2105-8-401 may be a valid DOI for title: The Protein Identifier Cross-Referencing (PICR) service: reconciling protein identifiers across multiple source databases
- 10.1093/nar/gkr1097 may be a valid DOI for title: Identifiers. org and MIRIAM Registry: community resources to provide persistent identification
- 10.1101/2021.03.30.437702 may be a valid DOI for title: Gene name errors: lessons not learned
- 10.1093/nar/gki031 may be a valid DOI for title: Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI

INVALID DOIs

- None
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 years ago

@maxkfranz thanks for this submission. I will be looking for a handling editor for this work. In the mean time can you work on fixing those references :point_up:. You can call @whedon generate pdf here to update the paper and call @whedon check references to check those DOI's. Thanks.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 years ago

@whedon invite @galessiorob as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

@galessiorob has been invited to edit this submission.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 years ago

@galessiorob do you think you could edit this work? The editors in the domain of bioinformatics are currently handling many other submissions. Let me know if this works fits well enough with your data science background. Thanks

maxkfranz commented 3 years ago

The suggested DOIs look correct to me. Thanks

@whedon check references

galessiorob commented 3 years ago

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Happy to take this one!

@maxkfranz I'll start reaching out to potential reviewers, but if you have any specific suggestions feel free to ping them here.

galessiorob commented 3 years ago

@whedon check references

whedon commented 3 years ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1101/2021.03.10.382333 may be a valid DOI for title: Capturing scientific knowledge in computable form
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1039 may be a valid DOI for title: Pathway Commons, a web resource for biological pathway data
- 10.1038/npre.2009.3212.1 may be a valid DOI for title: Reflect: augmented browsing for the life scientist
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn424 may be a valid DOI for title: The Synergizer service for translating gene, protein and other biological identifiers
- 10.1093/nar/gkg034 may be a valid DOI for title: STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins
- 10.1186/gb-2008-9-s1-s4 may be a valid DOI for title: GeneMANIA: a real-time multiple association network integration algorithm for predicting gene function
- 10.1093/nar/gkm226 may be a valid DOI for title: g: Profiler—a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments
- 10.1186/1471-2105-8-401 may be a valid DOI for title: The Protein Identifier Cross-Referencing (PICR) service: reconciling protein identifiers across multiple source databases
- 10.1093/nar/gkr1097 may be a valid DOI for title: Identifiers. org and MIRIAM Registry: community resources to provide persistent identification
- 10.1101/2021.03.30.437702 may be a valid DOI for title: Gene name errors: lessons not learned
- 10.1093/nar/gki031 may be a valid DOI for title: Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI

INVALID DOIs

- None
galessiorob commented 3 years ago

@maxkfranz if the suggested DOIs look good you can start adding them to the actual doc.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 years ago

@whedon assign @galessiorob as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, the editor is @galessiorob

maxkfranz commented 3 years ago

@maxkfranz if the suggested DOIs look good you can start adding them to the actual doc.

I thought this was automatic. Assuming you mean the bib file, I'll amend that. Thanks

@maxkfranz I'll start reaching out to potential reviewers, but if you have any specific suggestions feel free to ping them here.

Here are some suggestions:

maxkfranz commented 3 years ago

@whedon check references

whedon commented 3 years ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1101/2021.03.10.382333 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1039 is OK
- 10.15252/msb.20177651 is OK
- 10.1038/npre.2009.3212.1 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn424 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkg034 is OK
- 10.1186/gb-2008-9-s1-s4 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkm226 is OK
- 10.1186/1471-2105-8-401 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkr1097 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.03.30.437702 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gki031 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
galessiorob commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @AlexanderPico as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @AlexanderPico is now a reviewer

maxkfranz commented 3 years ago

Other potential reviewers:

galessiorob commented 3 years ago

Thanks for the suggestions @maxkfranz, I have sent invites to all of them. I'll wait a few days for them to respond and as soon as we have at least two assigned reviewers we can start the process.

maxkfranz commented 3 years ago

Thanks, @galessiorob

galessiorob commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @rabdill as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @rabdill is now a reviewer

galessiorob commented 3 years ago

🎉 Thanks for volunteering to be reviewers @AlexanderPicoand @rabdill!

I'll generate a "review issue" that will contain individual checklists to go through, feel free to get started at your earliest convenience, don't hesitate to ask if you need clarification or help - you can @mention me directly on the issue.

galessiorob commented 3 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3756.