search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: ordPens: An R package for Selection, Smoothing and Principal Components Analysis for Ordinal Variables #3819

Closed whedon closed 3 years ago

whedon commented 3 years ago

Submitting author: @ahoshiyar (Aisouda Hoshiyar) Repository: https://github.com/ahoshiyar/ordPens Version: 1.0.0 Editor: @osorensen Reviewers: @fartist, @FranjoIM, @mingzehuang Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2418101c27f855d290a5da28bcee0ea5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2418101c27f855d290a5da28bcee0ea5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2418101c27f855d290a5da28bcee0ea5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2418101c27f855d290a5da28bcee0ea5)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ahoshiyar. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ahoshiyar if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 3 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
whedon commented 3 years ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1310

whedon commented 3 years ago 
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (497.3 files/s, 131138.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML                              1              0             46           1522
R                                9            332            120           1463
TeX                              1             48              1            390
Rmd                              4            204            351            249
Markdown                         4             70              0            214
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            19            654            518           3838
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository 'f8b5cbef35ea64e453e21b45' was
gathered on 2021/10/12.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.
whedon commented 3 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00753.x is OK
- 10.1007/s13253-014-0170-5 is OK
- 10.1515/sagmb-2015-0091 is OK
- 10.1007/S11336-013-9343-3 is OK
- 10.1177/1471082X16642560 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00646.x is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00627.x is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00490.x is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00532.x is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1214/11-ejs661 may be a valid DOI for title: Testing linearity and relevance of ordinal predictors
- 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00088.x may be a valid DOI for title: Penalized Regression with Ordinal Predictors
- 10.1214/10-aoas355 may be a valid DOI for title: Sparse Modeling of Categorial Explanatory Variables
- 10.31234/osf.io/9qkhj may be a valid DOI for title: Modelling monotonic effects of ordinal predictors in Bayesian regression models
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 may be a valid DOI for title: The scree test for the number of factors
- 10.3390/su11143907 may be a valid DOI for title: Animal Ethics and Eating Animals: Consumer Segmentation Based on Domain-Specific Values
- 10.1016/s0167-9473(97)00038-8 may be a valid DOI for title: Ordinal principal component analysis theory and an application
- 10.1002/wics.1279 may be a valid DOI for title: Alternating least squares in nonlinear principal components
- 10.1007/bfb0092976 may be a valid DOI for title: Dual and primal-dual methods for solving strictly convex quadratic programs
- 10.1007/bf02591962 may be a valid DOI for title: A numerically stable dual method for solving strictly convex quadratic programs
- 10.1007/bf02293871 may be a valid DOI for title: The principal components of mixed measurement level multivariate data: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features
- 10.1007/s11336-018-9623-z may be a valid DOI for title: Approximated penalized maximum likelihood for exploratory factor analysis: An orthogonal case
- 10.4324/9781315128948-36 may be a valid DOI for title: The assignment of numbers to rank order categories
- 10.1214/ss/1038425655 may be a valid DOI for title: Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0159-8_2 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
whedon commented 3 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

whedon commented 3 years ago

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 3 years ago

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository
ahoshiyar commented 3 years ago

potential reviewers in statistics with R might be:

fartist (fengji@berkeley.edu) Metafrancois (francois.leonard@uliege.be) OwenWard (owen.ward@columbia.edu) msalibian (matias@stat.ubc.ca) bernardsilenou (bernard.silenou@helmholtz-hzi.de)

arfon commented 3 years ago

@whedon invite @osorensen as editor

:wave: @osorensen – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

whedon commented 3 years ago

@osorensen has been invited to edit this submission.

osorensen commented 3 years ago

@whedon assign @osorensen as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, the editor is @osorensen

osorensen commented 3 years ago

@whedon check references

whedon commented 3 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00753.x is OK
- 10.1007/s13253-014-0170-5 is OK
- 10.1515/sagmb-2015-0091 is OK
- 10.1007/S11336-013-9343-3 is OK
- 10.1177/1471082X16642560 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00646.x is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00627.x is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00490.x is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00532.x is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1214/11-ejs661 may be a valid DOI for title: Testing linearity and relevance of ordinal predictors
- 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00088.x may be a valid DOI for title: Penalized Regression with Ordinal Predictors
- 10.1214/10-aoas355 may be a valid DOI for title: Sparse Modeling of Categorial Explanatory Variables
- 10.31234/osf.io/9qkhj may be a valid DOI for title: Modelling monotonic effects of ordinal predictors in Bayesian regression models
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 may be a valid DOI for title: The scree test for the number of factors
- 10.3390/su11143907 may be a valid DOI for title: Animal Ethics and Eating Animals: Consumer Segmentation Based on Domain-Specific Values
- 10.1016/s0167-9473(97)00038-8 may be a valid DOI for title: Ordinal principal component analysis theory and an application
- 10.1002/wics.1279 may be a valid DOI for title: Alternating least squares in nonlinear principal components
- 10.1007/bfb0092976 may be a valid DOI for title: Dual and primal-dual methods for solving strictly convex quadratic programs
- 10.1007/bf02591962 may be a valid DOI for title: A numerically stable dual method for solving strictly convex quadratic programs
- 10.1007/bf02293871 may be a valid DOI for title: The principal components of mixed measurement level multivariate data: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features
- 10.1007/s11336-018-9623-z may be a valid DOI for title: Approximated penalized maximum likelihood for exploratory factor analysis: An orthogonal case
- 10.4324/9781315128948-36 may be a valid DOI for title: The assignment of numbers to rank order categories
- 10.1214/ss/1038425655 may be a valid DOI for title: Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0159-8_2 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
osorensen commented 3 years ago

@ahoshiyar, thanks for suggesting potential reviewers. While we wait for reviewers to confirm, can you please fix the issues with references shown in the post above?

ahoshiyar commented 3 years ago

@whedon check references

whedon commented 3 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00753.x is OK
- 10.1214/11-EJS661 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00088.x is OK
- 10.1214/10-aoas355 is OK
- 10.1007/s13253-014-0170-5 is OK
- 10.1515/sagmb-2015-0091 is OK
- 10.31234/osf.io/9qkhj is OK
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 is OK
- 10.3390/su11143907 is OK
- 10.1016/s0167-9473(97)00038-8 is OK
- 10.1007/978-981-10-0159-8_2 is OK
- 10.1002/wics.1279 is OK
- 10.1007/bfb0092976 is OK
- 10.1007/bf02591962 is OK
- 10.1007/bf02293871 is OK
- 10.1007/S11336-013-9343-3 is OK
- 10.1007/s11336-018-9623-z is OK
- 10.1177/1471082X16642560 is OK
- 10.4324/9781315128948-36 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00646.x is OK
- 10.1214/ss/1038425655 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00627.x is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00490.x is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00532.x is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
osorensen commented 3 years ago

@whedon generate pdf

whedon commented 3 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

osorensen commented 3 years ago

@fartist @Metafrancois @OwenWard @msalibian @bernardsilenou @franjoim @mingzehuang would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

fartist commented 3 years ago
Yes-I’d happy to. Sent from Mail for Windows From: Øystein SørensenSent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 11:05 AMTo: openjournals/joss-reviewsCc: Feeeeeeeeeeng; MentionSubject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: ordPens: An R package for Selection, Smoothing and Principal Components Analysis for Ordinal Variables ***@***.*** @Metafrancois @OwenWard @msalibian @bernardsilenou @FranjoIM @mingzehuang would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html—You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. 
FranjoIM commented 3 years ago

Yes, I'd be happy to as well.

msalibian commented 3 years ago

Sorry, I'll have to pass on this one. I just finished another JOSS review and find myself a bit overbooked.

mingzehuang commented 3 years ago

Yes, I'm happy to review it:)

osorensen commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @fartist as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @fartist is now a reviewer

osorensen commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @FranjoIM as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @FranjoIM is now a reviewer

osorensen commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @mingzehuang as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @mingzehuang is now a reviewer

osorensen commented 3 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3828.