Closed whedon closed 2 years ago
@crvernon Thanks for the paper feedback. This has now been incorporated to the joss
branch.
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss. Reticulating splines etc...
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@whedon check references from branch joss
Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1021/ci500302p is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00622 is OK
- 10.14454/FXWS-0523 is OK
- 10.1186/s13321-017-0190-6 is OK
- 10.17487/RFC6749 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@cc-a - we are almost there! Next is just setting up the archive for your new release.
So here is what we have left to do:
I can then move forward with accepting the submission.
@cc-a Just following up to see if any progress has been made in my last comment ⬆️
Thanks for the reminder. I've archived a new release at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6026417
@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.6026417 as archive
OK. 10.5281/zenodo.6026417 is the archive.
@whedon set v2.1.0 as version
OK. v2.1.0 is the version.
🎉 @cc-a thanks for putting together a really nice software product! Thanks to @thurber and @acrlakshman for a constructive and timely review!
I am recommending that your submission be accepted. An EIC will review this shortly and confirm final publication if all goes well.
@whedon recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
PDF failed to compile for issue #3824 with the following error:
Can't find any papers to compile :-(
@whedon recommend-accept from branch joss
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1021/ci500302p is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00622 is OK
- 10.14454/FXWS-0523 is OK
- 10.1186/s13321-017-0190-6 is OK
- 10.17487/RFC6749 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/joss-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/2936
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/2936, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true from branch joss
Hi @cc-a! Looks ready to go!!
@whedon accept deposit=true from branch joss
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
Congratulations on your new publication @cc-a!! Many thanks to editor @crvernon and reviewers @thurber and @acrlakshman for your time, hard work, and expertise!
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03824/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03824)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03824">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03824/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.03824/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03824
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Submitting author: @cc-a (Christopher Cave-Ayland) Repository: https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/champ Version: v2.1.0 Editor: @crvernon Reviewer: @thurber, @acrlakshman Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.6026417
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@thurber & @acrlakshman, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @crvernon know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Review checklist for @thurber
✨ Important: Please do not use the Convert to issue functionality when working through this checklist, instead, please open any new issues associated with your review in the software repository associated with the submission. ✨
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @acrlakshman
✨ Important: Please do not use the Convert to issue functionality when working through this checklist, instead, please open any new issues associated with your review in the software repository associated with the submission. ✨
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper