Closed whedon closed 2 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
PDF failed to compile for issue #3835 with the following error:
Can't find any papers to compile :-(
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.60 s (301.8 files/s, 95674.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 152 10388 13813 27230
reStructuredText 22 1059 1362 2895
YAML 3 35 72 300
DOS Batch 1 23 1 166
make 1 28 6 145
Bourne Shell 3 32 58 75
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 182 11565 15312 30811
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '2793d92489c8b8b0e5c456ed' was
gathered on 2021/10/19.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Arno Ulbricht 2 111 7 0.04
Guillaume 51 31019 53135 25.67
Guillaume Sagnol 157 39135 15114 16.55
Guillaume Sagnol (th 15 949 169 0.34
Jin H. Jung 1 6 5 0.00
Leonard Kleinhans 1 4 4 0.00
Malte Renken 1 2 2 0.00
Maximilian Stahlberg 976 93714 64497 48.27
Peter Wittek 14 286 58 0.10
Petur Helgi 1 7 2 0.00
Ray Ganardi 1 1 1 0.00
Seeland 5 171 20 0.06
Sergio Callegari 1 5 3 0.00
Shaun Ren 4 28 18 0.01
Xavier Valcarce 3 41 7 0.01
bzffourn 4 188 28 0.07
bzfsagno 67 23885 4966 8.80
bzfulbri 1 2 0 0.00
gsagnol 1 6 2 0.00
paul.fournel@gmail.c 1 87 0 0.03
ziofil 3 46 36 0.03
Élie Gouzien 1 17 3 0.01
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Guillaume 12 0.0 73.8 0.00
Guillaume Sagnol 2180 5.6 19.3 7.98
Maximilian Stahlberg 49109 52.4 21.5 16.49
Peter Wittek 2 0.7 66.6 0.00
bzfulbri 125 6250.0 69.3 27.20
Élie Gouzien 3 17.6 31.6 0.00
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss. Reticulating splines etc...
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@whedon check references from branch joss
Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1080/23307706.2017.1397554 may be a valid DOI for title: A rewriting system for convex optimization problems
- 10.1007/s12532-011-0026-8 may be a valid DOI for title: Pyomo: modeling and solving mathematical programs in Python
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon invite @melissawm as editor
@melissawm has been invited to edit this submission.
@Viech can you work on those potentially missing DOI's :point_up:
Hello!
The two proposed DOIs seem correct; I added both to paper.bib
. Note that the journal paper here has a DOI in the URL but doi.org does not recognize it, so I left it without one.
Making my co-author @gsagnol aware of this review.
From the list of reviewers who claim Python as a preferred language, for each group in the order that they appear in the list:
bleyerj
and sfuxy
have convex optimization in their topics;nmoran
, TejasAvinashShetty
and marwahaha
name quantum information which PICOS offers a few specialized features for;sayakpaul
has tagged adversarial robustness which fits the recent (D)RO support of PICOS.So from that list, maybe sfuxy
, marwahaha
and sayakpaul
would be a good trio with diverse perspectives.
@whedon assign @melissawm as editor
OK, the editor is @melissawm
Thanks for your patience, I have been out of office.
👋🏻 Hello @sfuxy, @marwahaha, @sayakpaul would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
I can review sometime in December.
Hi @melissawm. Unfortunately, I will have to pass this one out.
Hello Melissa,
Yes, I will be able to start reviewing after thanksgiving. I’m very familiar with conic programming, SOCP/SDP but it’s my first time review with JOSS. If I have questions related to the review process, can I refer them to you?
Thanks, Silvano
Il giorno martedì 9 novembre 2021, Melissa Weber Mendonça < @.***> ha scritto:
Thanks for your patience, I have been out of office.
👋🏻 Hello @sfuxy https://github.com/sfuxy, @marwahaha https://github.com/marwahaha, @sayakpaul https://github.com/sayakpaul would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3835#issuecomment-964225441, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHGZ2GR2PNLPGYMXOJIPRMLULEYXNANCNFSM5GJLAYSQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
Of course, @sfuxy - that is perfectly fine, feel free to ping if you have any questions. If @Viech is ok with the review starting in december, I can assign @marwahaha, otherwise we can try to find another reviewer.
Just for information, I will assign @sfuxy as reviewer but the actual review issue will only start after a second reviewer is decided on.
@whedon assign @sfuxy as reviewer
OK, @sfuxy is now a reviewer
I'm fine with the review starting in December!
Great, then I'll add @marwahaha as a reviewer and we can start. This will automatically close this issue, and a new one (where the actual review will happen) will be opened, and you all will be tagged on it. Thanks!
@whedon add @marwahaha as reviewer
OK, @marwahaha is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3915.
Submitting author: @Viech (Maximilian Stahlberg) Repository: https://gitlab.com/picos-api/picos Version: v2.3 Editor: @melissawm Reviewers: @sfuxy, @marwahaha Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Viech. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@Viech if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: