openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: yadg: yet another datagram #4090

Closed whedon closed 2 years ago

whedon commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: @PeterKraus (Peter Kraus) Repository: https://github.com/dgbowl/yadg Version: v4.0.0 Editor: @galessiorob Reviewers: @aozorahime, @1mikegrn Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/88a0f9f20c0719d399fbbae73df0a5a3"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/88a0f9f20c0719d399fbbae73df0a5a3/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/88a0f9f20c0719d399fbbae73df0a5a3/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/88a0f9f20c0719d399fbbae73df0a5a3)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @PeterKraus. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @jgostick.

@PeterKraus if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 2 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
whedon commented 2 years ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1191

whedon commented 2 years ago
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=5.53 s (24.4 files/s, 110112.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                            34              0              0         596261
Python                          67           1203           2254           6812
reStructuredText                21            243            360            584
SVG                              2              2              2            349
YAML                             7              9             20            224
TeX                              1             21              0            205
Markdown                         2             23              0             70
TOML                             1              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           135           1501           2636         604511
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository 'c5e9dc91e7563a2a4d9be693' was
gathered on 2022/01/21.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Kraus                            1            74             73            0.48
Kraus, Peter                    16          3924           1935           19.14
Nicolas Vetsch                   1           544              0            1.78
Peter Kraus                     27          3375           1261           15.14
Vetsch, Nicolas                  2          1940            169            6.89
krpe                            88          6880           4842           38.29
vetschn                         44          2983           2617           18.29

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Kraus, Peter               6595          168.1          2.1                2.79
Nicolas Vetsch              544          100.0          0.0                6.25
Peter Kraus                 336           10.0          4.7               12.50
Vetsch, Nicolas            2789          143.8          0.5                6.38
vetschn                       5            0.2          2.3                0.00
whedon commented 2 years ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.33774/chemrxiv-2021-mh17g is OK
- 10.1002/cctc.202001132 is OK
- 10.1186/1471-2105-13-115 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f is OK
- 10.1007/s11244-020-01380-2 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
whedon commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

kyleniemeyer commented 2 years ago

Hi @PeterKraus, normally we would find an editor at this stage, who would then identify and assign reviewers for your submission—unfortunately none of the editors with relevant expertise are available right now, so we have to put your submission on our waitlist for the time being.

In the meantime, it would be a great help if you could suggest any reviewers, to help speed up the process once we do assign an editor. Thanks!

PeterKraus commented 2 years ago

Hi @kyleniemeyer, no worries, I understand the delays. I had a look at the reviewer list, and here are some suggestions, as requested starting at the bottom of the list:

Cheers!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 2 years ago

@whedon invite @galessiorob as editor

whedon commented 2 years ago

@galessiorob has been invited to edit this submission.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 2 years ago

:wave: @galessiorob do you think you can take this one on?

galessiorob commented 2 years ago

@whedon add @galessiorob as editor

whedon commented 2 years ago

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands
galessiorob commented 2 years ago

@whedon assign @galessiorob as editor

whedon commented 2 years ago

OK, the editor is @galessiorob

galessiorob commented 2 years ago

👋 Hi @PeterKraus

I'm in the process of finding editors for this paper. If you have any suggestions feel free to add their handles in a comment, and I can send them invites. Looking forward to working on this paper!

PeterKraus commented 2 years ago

Hi @galessiorob, pleasure to have you as an editor. I've listed a few names of folks who seem to have the right interest & coding preferences from the lower parts of the "signed-up reviewers" sheet here - not sure if you want me to actually tag them or what's the process?

galessiorob commented 2 years ago

Awesome, thanks so much @PeterKraus! I can reach out to them and once we have two or three volunteers I'll open a review issue with a checklist for them to use as a guide.

galessiorob commented 2 years ago

@whedon add @aozorahime as reviewer

whedon commented 2 years ago

OK, @aozorahime is now a reviewer

galessiorob commented 2 years ago

@whedon add @1mikegrn as reviewer

whedon commented 2 years ago

OK, @1mikegrn is now a reviewer

galessiorob commented 2 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 2 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4166.