[PRE REVIEW]: RHEIA: Robust design optimization of renewable Hydrogen and dErIved energy cArrier systems

[whedon]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@DCoppitters<!--end-author-handle-- (Diederik Coppitters) Repository: https://github.com/rheia-framework/RHEIA Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@fraukewiese<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @andr1976, @ClaraBuettner Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3fd7e487df85a808f1005a447f731f12"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3fd7e487df85a808f1005a447f731f12/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3fd7e487df85a808f1005a447f731f12/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3fd7e487df85a808f1005a447f731f12)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @DCoppitters. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@DCoppitters if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1043

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118798 is OK
- 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117049 is OK
- 10.1115/1.4044491 is OK
- 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120692 is OK
- 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.549 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.101 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.132 is OK
- 10.3390/app10196653 is OK
- 10.1007/s11831-017-9240-5 is OK
- 10.2514/6.2017-3827 is OK
- 10.3390/en14134027 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.12.015 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00884 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00676 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jocs.2015.08.008 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00825 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1061/9780784413609.257 may be a valid DOI for title: UQLab: A framework for uncertainty quantification in Matlab

INVALID DOIs

- 10.5555/2503308.2503311 is INVALID

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.20 s (276.0 files/s, 112318.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              6              6              6           7477
Python                          27           1806           3246           3201
TeX                              2            293              0           2622
reStructuredText                15            999           1141           1363
Markdown                         2             29              0            124
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
TOML                             1              1              0             17
make                             1              4              6              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            55           3146           4400          14839
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository 'efbd7e41bb5dea7f7b560a43' was
gathered on 2022/02/04.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Diederik Coppitters             32         10618           2363           99.51
Tsiri                           14            31             33            0.49

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Diederik Coppitters        8253           77.7          1.3               14.89

[whedon]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@whedon invite @fraukewiese as editor

:wave: @fraukewiese do you think you can handle this submission? Thanks!

[whedon]

@fraukewiese has been invited to edit this submission.

[fraukewiese]

Yes, I can edit this submission.

[fraukewiese]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @fraukewiese

[fraukewiese]

@DCoppitters : Do you have suggestions for reviewers of our submission?

[DCoppitters]

Dear @fraukewiese,

Many thanks for editing the submission. I went through the list of potential reviewers and suggest the following reviewers: brynpickering sevberg fneum timtroendle

Best regards,

@DCoppitters

[fraukewiese]

@andr1976, @sevberg, @brynpickering – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is RHEIA: Robust design optimization of renewable Hydrogen and dErIved energy cArrier systems

[andr1976]

@fraukewiese, sorry for the late reply, let me see if I can squeeze it into my schedule, give me a few days and I will revert with a answer,

[fraukewiese]

Thanks @andr1976 for the reply. Hope you can make it, just let us know.

[fraukewiese]

@sevberg, @brynpickering – would one of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[brynpickering]

Sorry @fraukewiese, I have no time to dedicate to this submission at the moment.

[fraukewiese]

@andr1976 @sevberg - would one of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[andr1976]

@fraukewiese , I can review :-)

[fraukewiese]

@andr1976 : Thank you very much! I will add you as reviewer. The review will start as soon as we have found a second reviewer.

[fraukewiese]

@editorialbot add @andr1976 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@andr1976 added to the reviewers list!

[fraukewiese]

@sevberg @fneum @timtroendle : Would any of you be willing to review this submission?

[timtroendle]

Hello @fraukewiese, unfortunately, I won't have time to review this.

[fneum]

Hello @fraukewiese, unfortunately, I won't have time to review this either.

[fraukewiese]

@wholmgren, @EricaEgg, @kramea – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is RHEIA: Robust design optimization of renewable Hydrogen and dErIved energy cArrier systems

[fraukewiese]

@DCoppitters : Do you have any additional suggestions for reviewers?

[fraukewiese]

@wholmgren, @EricaEgg, @kramea - to make sure you have seen this request, I send it again: – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is RHEIA: Robust design optimization of renewable Hydrogen and dErIved energy cArrier systems

[wholmgren]

@fraukewiese sorry I am overextended right now

[EricaEgg]

Apologies, I am also not able to review right now.

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 3:02 AM fraukewiese @.***> wrote:

@wholmgren https://github.com/wholmgren, @EricaEgg https://github.com/EricaEgg, @kramea https://github.com/kramea - to make sure you have seen this request, I send it again: – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is RHEIA: Robust design optimization of renewable Hydrogen and dErIved energy cArrier systems https://github.com/rheia-framework/RHEIA

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4131#issuecomment-1103743450, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALCPASTBOQ3S7VRQ62KMRPLVF7I25ANCNFSM5NRRROUA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

-- Erica Eggleton she/her/hers PhD Candidate Schwartz Research Group https://uwemilab.github.io/ Department of Chemical Engineering https://www.cheme.washington.edu/ University of Washington

[fraukewiese]

@ClaraBuettner , @kramea: – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is RHEIA: Robust design optimization of renewable Hydrogen and dErIved energy cArrier systems

[fraukewiese]

Sorry @DCoppitters that it is taking that long to find reviewer. I am currently also trying to reach out to potential reviewer via mail. If you have any additional suggestions for reviewer, please let me know.

[ClaraBuettner]

Hi @fraukewiese, sorry for the late reply. I can review this.

[kramea]

Sorry, do not have time right now to review this properly.

[fraukewiese]

Thanks @ClaraBuettner ! I will add you as reviewer. And then start the review.

[fraukewiese]

@editorialbot add @ClaraBuettner as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@ClaraBuettner added to the reviewers list!

[fraukewiese]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4370.

[fraukewiese]

@andr1976 @ClaraBuettner – thanks a lot for agreeing to review here! See you over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4370 where the actual review will take place.