Closed whedon closed 2 years ago
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
We removed the "corresponding author" tag and everything works now on the preview. Can we proceed with this version of the paper ?
I think the following should work:
authors:
- name: Bardhyl Miftari
orcid: 0000-0001-5334-0234
equal-contrib: true
corresponding: true
email: bm@example.edu
affiliation: 1
- name: Mathias Berger
orcid: 0000-0003-3081-4833
equal-contrib: true
corresponding: true
email: mb@example.edu
affiliation: 1
Edit: best to provide a mail address, too.
@tarleb Thanks for the precision.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Everything seems good now. Thanks. We also added our emails to the paper.md which do not show on the paper which I guess is normal.
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1137/15M1020575 is OK
- 10.1007/s12532-011-0026-8 is OK
- 10.1007/s12532-012-0036-1 is OK
- 10.1287/mnsc.36.5.519 is OK
- 10.1007/s12532-009-0008-2 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4613-0215-5_8 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.188 is OK
- 10.23919/PSCC.2018.8442948 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00825 is OK
- 10.1016/j.esr.2018.01.003 is OK
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.033 is OK
- 10.3389/fenrg.2021.671279 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/joss-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/3163
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/3163, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@editorialbot accept
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
@odow, @leonardgoeke – many thanks for your reviews here and to @fraukewiese for editing this submission! JOSS relies upon the volunteer effort of people like you and we simply wouldn't be able to do this without you ✨
@MiftariB – your paper is now accepted and published in JOSS :zap::rocket::boom:
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04158/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04158)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04158">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04158/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04158/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04158
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Thank you @odow and @leonardgoeke for your reviews and your time ! Your feedback was very valuable to us. As the paper has been published, we've closed the issue on our gitlab but feel free to write to us for any question or remark. Thanks to @fraukewiese for editing this paper and making sure that the review process went well. Thanks to everyone involded for their commitment.
On a more personal note, I have joined the list of JOSS reviewers and would be happy to help in future reviews.
Best Regards,
Miftari B
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@MiftariB<!--end-author-handle-- (Bardhyl Miftari) Repository: https://gitlab.uliege.be/smart_grids/public/gboml Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.1 Editor: !--editor-->@fraukewiese<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @odow, @leonardgoeke Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.6470268
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@odow & @leonardgoeke, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @fraukewiese know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Review checklist for @odow
✨ Important: Please do not use the Convert to issue functionality when working through this checklist, instead, please open any new issues associated with your review in the software repository associated with the submission. ✨
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @leonardgoeke
✨ Important: Please do not use the Convert to issue functionality when working through this checklist, instead, please open any new issues associated with your review in the software repository associated with the submission. ✨
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper