[PRE REVIEW]: DIRECT: Deep Image REConstruction Toolkit

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@georgeyiasemis<!--end-author-handle-- (George Yiasemis) Repository: https://github.com/NKI-AI/direct Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-submission Version: v1.0.1 Editor: !--editor-->@osorensen<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @estenhl, @sairamgeethanath Managing EiC: Arfon M. Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/150119fd46692dad9448a26eca669a77"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/150119fd46692dad9448a26eca669a77/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/150119fd46692dad9448a26eca669a77/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/150119fd46692dad9448a26eca669a77)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @georgeyiasemis. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@georgeyiasemis if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.21 s (895.9 files/s, 136900.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                         131           3434           4026          12058
SVG                              2              0              0           5849
YAML                            26             22             37           1955
reStructuredText                21            276            514            318
Markdown                         6             81              0            316
TeX                              1             15              0            160
make                             2             27              6             80
TOML                             1              9              4             49
Dockerfile                       1             15              7             45
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             27
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           192           3887           4595          20857
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1142

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/tmi.2021.3075856 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_7 is OK
- 10.1109/tmi.2018.2799231 is OK
- 10.1088/0031-9155/52/7/r01 is OK
- 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00523 may be a valid DOI for title: Joint Deep Model-Based MR Image and Coil Sensitivity Reconstruction Network (Joint-ICNet) for Fast MRI

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.01.005 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27201 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[kthyng]

Hi @danasolav! Is this submission in your area of expertise?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @danasolav as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[georgeyiasemis]

@editorialbot commands

[georgeyiasemis]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Hello @georgeyiasemis, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[georgeyiasemis]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/tmi.2021.3075856 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_7 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2019.01.005 is OK
- 10.1109/tmi.2018.2799231 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.27201 is OK
- 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00523 is OK
- 10.1088/0031-9155/52/7/r01 is OK
- 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[danasolav]

Hi @danasolav! Is this submission in your area of expertise?

@kthyng I'm sorry, this is too much out of my area of expertise.

[kthyng]

@danasolav ok

@osorensen are you up for editing this submission?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @osorensen as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[osorensen]

@editorialbot add @osorensen as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @osorensen is now the editor

[osorensen]

@georgeyiasemis I'm the editor for this submission now. If you have any suggestions for reviewers, please let me know.

[osorensen]

:wave: @bencardoen @Ykarpate @fepegar would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[jonasteuwen]

@osorensen I believe @silvandeleemput could be a good reviewer. I do have a JOSS paper together with him.

[osorensen]

@osorensen I believe @silvandeleemput could be a good reviewer. I do have a JOSS paper together with him.

Thanks for the suggestion, @jonasteuwen. Unfortunately, I'm afraid your previous co-authorship won't be compliant with our guidelines for conflicts of interest. I'll keep trying to find reviewers.

[georgeyiasemis]

Hi @osorensen 👋 @zaccharieramzi might make a good reviewer if he is able. He works on a similar domain

[osorensen]

@zaccharieramzi would you be interested in reviewing this submission to the Journal of Open Source Software?

[fepegar]

Hi, @osorensen. I think I wouldn't make a good reviewer for this. I've shared it with colleagues that work on reconstruction.

[osorensen]

Thanks @fepegar! Please let me know if any of your colleagues are interested

[bencardoen]

Hi @osorensen, as my expertise is more towards fluorescence/microscopy/superresolution, and not so much MRI, I'm not a good choice as reviewer. However, I've forwarded it to my colleagues.

[osorensen]

@editorialbot add @estenhl as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@estenhl added to the reviewers list!

[osorensen]

:wave: @sairamgeethanath would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[sairamgeethanath]

@osorensen I'd be happy to!

[osorensen]

@editorialbot add @sairamgeethanath as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@sairamgeethanath added to the reviewers list!

[osorensen]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4278.

[bencardoen]

@osorensen Do you still need reviewers for this? Can I mention someone here by tag or do they need to add themselves here first?

[osorensen]

Thanks @bencardoen! Although we have two reviewers, one more would be great, so please mention their GitHub usernames here without the leading '@'

[zaccharieramzi]

@zaccharieramzi would you be interested in reviewing this submission to the Journal of Open Source Software?

Hi @osorensen ,

I am currently on holiday with little internet access. I think the submission could be in my range of expertise, in which case I would be interested in reviewing it. But can I get back to you after April 3rd to give you a final answer?

[osorensen]

Thanks @zaccharieramzi. As we've already found two reviewers, I suggest that I get back to you in a later submission. Enjoy your holiday!