openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
720 stars 38 forks source link

[REVIEW]: Connectome Mapper 3: A Flexible and Open-Source Pipeline Software for Multiscale Multimodal Human Connectome Mapping #4248

Closed editorialbot closed 2 years ago

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@sebastientourbier<!--end-author-handle-- (Sebastien Tourbier) Repository: https://github.com/connectomicslab/connectomemapper3 Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v3.0.4 Editor: !--editor-->@osorensen<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @adbartni, @jsheunis Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.6645256

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fa1f416a4a6c23fe19bda6f36f123c1e"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fa1f416a4a6c23fe19bda6f36f123c1e/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fa1f416a4a6c23fe19bda6f36f123c1e/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fa1f416a4a6c23fe19bda6f36f123c1e)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@adbartni & @jsheunis, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @osorensen know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

πŸ“ Checklist for @jsheunis

πŸ“ Checklist for @adbartni

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot accept

editorialbot commented 2 years ago
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

🐦🐦🐦 πŸ‘‰ Tweet for this paper πŸ‘ˆ 🐦🐦🐦

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨

Here's what you must now do:

  1. Check final PDF and Crossref metadata that was deposited :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/3312
  2. Wait a couple of minutes, then verify that the paper DOI resolves https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04248
  3. If everything looks good, then close this review issue.
  4. Party like you just published a paper! πŸŽ‰πŸŒˆπŸ¦„πŸ’ƒπŸ‘»πŸ€˜

Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 2 years ago

@sebastientourbier congratulations on your JOSS publication!

@osorensen thanks for editing this one!

And special thanks to @adbartni and @jsheunis for your review efforts!! :tada:

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04248/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04248)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04248">
  <img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04248/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04248/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04248

This is how it will look in your documentation:

DOI

We need your help!

The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:

sebastientourbier commented 2 years ago

This is a really great πŸŽ‰ Thank you very much all for the time you invested in the reviewing/editing process. It really helped in improving the robustness and the documentation of CMP3, as well as the quality of the paper. πŸ™