search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
722 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: LenslessPiCam: A Hardware and Software Platform for Lensless Computational Imaging with a Raspberry Pi #4259

Closed editorialbot closed 2 years ago

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@ebezzam<!--end-author-handle-- (Eric Bezzam) Repository: https://github.com/LCAV/LenslessPiCam Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@danasolav<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @antipa, @vboomi, @raolivei13 Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/251f14f2ffe4ccf239796ad4a71e2bb7"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/251f14f2ffe4ccf239796ad4a71e2bb7/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/251f14f2ffe4ccf239796ad4a71e2bb7/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/251f14f2ffe4ccf239796ad4a71e2bb7)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ebezzam. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ebezzam if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
danasolav commented 2 years ago

:wave: @jamesfolberth & @Nikunj-Gupta,

would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

JOSS is a free, open-source, community driven and developer-friendly online journal (no publisher is seeking to raise revenue from the volunteer labor of researchers!).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged.

The checklist-driven reviews involve downloading and installing the software, and inspecting the repository and submitted short paper for key elements. See https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Editors and reviewers post comments on the Review issue, and authors respond to the comments and improve their submission until acceptance (or withdrawal, if they feel unable to satisfy the review).

If you cannot review, can you recommend someone from your team to help out?

Kind regards, Dana Solav

ebezzam commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the invite, but I have no time this month for a review. Hope you find someone, if it's still pending in mid-June, feel free to ping me again.

@aquilesC just reaching out to see if you have some spare time to do the review?

Thanks, Eric

danasolav commented 2 years ago

👋 @jamesfolberth, @Nikunj-Gupta, @THUHoloLab, @julianstirling, @monakhova, @aquilesC Checking again if you would be willing to review this software submission, or if you could suggest another person who would be a good fit for this review? Thanks!

antipa commented 2 years ago

Hi Dana, I'm sorry, but I've been much busier than expected and this keeps slipping off my to-do list. I have an MS student who might be able/interested in taking it on. I'll forward to them and see if they can help out.

-Nick

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:45 PM Dana Solav @.***> wrote:

👋 @jamesfolberth https://github.com/jamesfolberth, @Nikunj-Gupta https://github.com/Nikunj-Gupta, @THUHoloLab https://github.com/THUHoloLab, @julianstirling https://github.com/julianstirling, @monakhova https://github.com/monakhova, @aquilesC https://github.com/aquilesC Checking again if you would be willing to review this software submission, or if you could suggest another person who would be a good fit for this review? Thanks!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4259#issuecomment-1193607188, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABDELF2B5YBS3SJXGN2VKALVVYSYTANCNFSM5RH7COCA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

antipa commented 2 years ago

Hi All, I am unfortunately over-subscribed so I need to pass this along to a student of mine. Richard Oliveira, cc'd, has offered to help with the review. If you're still looking for reviewers feel free to add him.

Nick

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:45 PM Dana Solav @.***> wrote:

👋 @jamesfolberth https://github.com/jamesfolberth, @Nikunj-Gupta https://github.com/Nikunj-Gupta, @THUHoloLab https://github.com/THUHoloLab, @julianstirling https://github.com/julianstirling, @monakhova https://github.com/monakhova, @aquilesC https://github.com/aquilesC Checking again if you would be willing to review this software submission, or if you could suggest another person who would be a good fit for this review? Thanks!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4259#issuecomment-1193607188, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABDELF2B5YBS3SJXGN2VKALVVYSYTANCNFSM5RH7COCA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

danasolav commented 2 years ago

@antipa, thank you for following up on this. Can you please share Richard's GitHub username or email?

ebezzam commented 2 years ago

@danasolav, I had an email exchange with Vivek Boominathan, and he kindly agreed to review the paper as well. His GitHub username is @vboomi.

danasolav commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot add @vboomi as reviewer

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

@vboomi added to the reviewers list!

ebezzam commented 2 years ago

@danasolav I've gotten Richard's email from Nick: richard.a.oliveira1998@gmail.com

danasolav commented 2 years ago

@ebezzam I emailed him last week but he hasn't responded. @antipa could you please ask him, or recommend someone else from your group? Thank you for your patience. I apologize that it is taking so long to find reviewers for this submission. It is normally not the case.

raolivei13 commented 2 years ago

Hello, I'm Richard. Apologies for the late comment, when I was initially informed of this, the email has gotten lost or I may have not received it. I can review the paper, that is what is needed correct?

raolivei13 commented 2 years ago

This is the link to the paper correct? Download article proof

danasolav commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot add @raolivei13 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

@raolivei13 added to the reviewers list!

danasolav commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4747.

danasolav commented 2 years ago

@raolivei13 @vboomi, thank you for agreeing to review this submission. The review process takes place here.