[PRE REVIEW]: PFEIFER: Preprocessing Framework of Electrograms Intermittently Fiducialized from Experimental Recordings

[whedon]

Submitting author: @bzenger (Brian Zenger) Repository: https://github.com/SCIInstitute/PFEIFER Version: v1.0.0 Editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Reviewer: @CristianaCorsi

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @bzenger. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@bzenger if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[bzenger]

Hi, we would like to suggest the following reviewers for our JOSS submission.

Thanks.

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, @cMadan, @nirum

[bzenger]

Hi @arfon,

Is there anything else we need to do to get an editor assigned?

Thanks

[arfon]

Is there anything else we need to do to get an editor assigned?

Not right now. We need one of the JOSS editors to volunteer to edit this submission (which they've not yet done so).

Sorry for the delay.

[nirum]

Hi, I don’t have the bandwidth right now to give this a thorough review. Apologies! - Niru

On Nov 17, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Arfon Smith notifications@github.com wrote:

Is there anything else we need to do to get an editor assigned?

Not right now. We need one of the JOSS editors to volunteer to edit this submission (which they've not yet done so).

Sorry for the delay.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[arfon]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# Assign a GitHub user as the reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor

# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive

# Open the review issue
@whedon start review

🚧 🚧 🚧 Experimental Whedon features 🚧 🚧 🚧

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

[bzenger]

@arfon thanks for the info and the response. Let us know if anything comes up.

[arfon]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman @cMadan - would either of you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS? I realize it's a little out of any of our expertise areas but we could look at getting an additional reviewer to help here.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

I can help sure I'll take this one

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@whedon assign @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editot

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@whedon assign @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editor

[arfon]

@whedon assign @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman

[bzenger]

@arfon @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Thank you so much for your work on this. Please let us know if we can help by recommending possible external reviewers.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@bzenger please feel free to recommend reviewers. Recommend them by tagging them in a post with their github handles. Thanks

[bzenger]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman thanks we have a possible reviewer @CristianaCorsi​. Let us know if there is anything else we need to do.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

Thanks. @CristianaCorsi you have been suggested as potential reviewer. If you are interested in reviewing can you please share​ your full name and perhaps a link to a professional (e.g. institutional) page? I ask this for verification and to learn about your affiliation/status/experience since your GitHub profile seems brand new and is currently empty.

[CristianaCorsi]

My full name is Cristiana Corsi and my istitutional page is https://www.unibo.it/sitoweb/cristiana.corsi3/en

Kind regards, Cristiana Corsi

Il 22/11/2017 22.04, Kevin Mattheus Moerman ha scritto:

Thanks. @CristianaCorsi https://github.com/cristianacorsi you have been suggested as potential reviewer. If you are interested in reviewing can you please share​ your full name and perhaps a link to a professional (e.g. institutional) page? I ask this for verification and to learn about your affiliation/status/experience since your GitHub profile seems brand new and is currently empty.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/446#issuecomment-346472349, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AgVBg_KOC7p0po4C5h_HTCdW87oA3XZFks5s5IxKgaJpZM4QONdu.

-- Cristiana Corsi, PhD, Associate Professor Department of Electric, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" - DEI University of Bologna Via Risorgimento 2 - 40136 Bologna - Italy Via Venezia 52 - 47521 Cesena - Italy tel. +39 051 2093009 - +39 0547 339207

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

Great thanks. @CristianaCorsi

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@whedon assign @CristianaCorsi as reviewer

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

You didn't say the magic word! Try this:

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@whedon assign @CristianaCorsi as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @CristianaCorsi

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/472. Feel free to close this issue now!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@bzenger @CristianaCorsi I've started the review issue see #472.