openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
715 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: rTASSEL: An R interface to TASSEL for analyzing genomic diversity #4499

Closed editorialbot closed 2 years ago

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@btmonier<!--end-author-handle-- (Brandon Monier) Repository: https://github.com/maize-genetics/rTASSEL Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper Version: v0.9.26 Editor: !--editor-->@fboehm<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @tkchafin, @tomsing1 Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3b166c073aeb440e4f0b0bd01683596b"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3b166c073aeb440e4f0b0bd01683596b/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3b166c073aeb440e4f0b0bd01683596b/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3b166c073aeb440e4f0b0bd01683596b)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @btmonier. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@btmonier if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 2 years ago
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (1186.1 files/s, 211352.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               39            905           1784           3474
Rmd                              3            425            969            333
Markdown                         3             83              0            318
TeX                              1             14              0            222
YAML                             2              4              0             22
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            48           1431           2753           4369
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1260

editorialbot commented 2 years ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308 is OK
- 10.1093/bib/bbp050 is OK
- 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118 is OK
- 10.1038/ng1702 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts163 is OK
- 10.1534/g3.112.004259 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011 is OK
- 10.1534/genetics.114.171322 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.01.001 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633 may be a valid DOI for title: ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot invite @fboehm as editor

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 2 years ago

@btmonier thanks for this JOSS submission. I am the AEiC on call this week and here to help with the initial steps. I have started searching for a handling editor and invited @fboehm as suggested. Note that our system flagged some potentially missing DOIs :point_up: , can you check these? You can call @editorialbot generate pdf to update the paper, and you can call @editorialbot check references to re-check the DOIs too. Thanks.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Assigned! @fboehm is now the editor

fboehm commented 2 years ago

Thanks, I'm happy to serve as editor for this submission.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot list reviewers

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@Tgerke, @jhollist - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

jhollist commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the invite, but I am going to have to decline. Busy time of year!

fboehm commented 2 years ago

No problem, @jhollist ! I appreciate the reply, and I hope that we can work on a future submission.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@skummerf and @afrubin - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

afrubin commented 2 years ago

@fboehm Thanks for considering me for this review. Unfortunately I don't have time to deliver a review in a reasonable amount of time right now.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

No problem, @afrubin! I hope that we can work together on a future submission.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@rrrlw @cskovron @AksanBA @stulacy - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

rrrlw commented 2 years ago

Unfortunately, I will be unable to review this submission. Best of luck!

stulacy commented 2 years ago

Sorry, I won't be able to review this as it is outside of my area of expertise.

On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 17:27, Raoul @.***> wrote:

Unfortunately, I will be unable to review this submission. Best of luck!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4499#issuecomment-1164624707, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACOALL3AYFS57RW427GS623VQSGAJANCNFSM5ZQK3URQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

-- Stuart Lacy Research Software Engineer Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Lab & Information Services C/G/116 University of York Heslington York YO10 5DD +44 (0)1904 324756

[image: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/abouttheuniversity/supportservices/informationdirectorate/images/cse/CSEUK%20Primary%20(r)%20RGB-80x95.jpg] Disclaimer: https://www.york.ac.uk/about/legal-statements/email-disclaimer/

fboehm commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the replies, @rrrlw and @stulacy . I hope that we can work together on a future submission.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@simonpcouch @flor14 @bioedd @stevokeyo @brunomontezano @stmcg - Would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

btmonier commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

btmonier commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 2 years ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308 is OK
- 10.1093/bib/bbp050 is OK
- 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118 is OK
- 10.1038/ng1702 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts163 is OK
- 10.1534/g3.112.004259 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011 is OK
- 10.1534/genetics.114.171322 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.01.001 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

simonpcouch commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the invite! Unfortunately, I won't be able to review as this submission is outside of my area of expertise.

AksanBA commented 2 years ago

Hi, thanks for the invite as well but I can't review as this is outside my area of expertise.

stevokeyo commented 2 years ago

Hello,

Unfortunately I will nor be in a position to take-up this review seeing its scope is out of my area of specialisation.

Stephen.

On 24 Jun 2022, at 21:11, Frederick Boehm @.***> wrote:

@simonpcouch https://github.com/simonpcouch @flor14 https://github.com/flor14 @bioedd https://github.com/bioedd @stevokeyo https://github.com/stevokeyo @brunomontezano https://github.com/brunomontezano @stmcg https://github.com/stmcg - Would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4499#issuecomment-1165815864, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMNHBTHCKO6O2X4YV5Q6DS3VQX26ZANCNFSM5ZQK3URQ. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

stmcg commented 2 years ago

Hi, thanks for the invite. I won't be able to review this as it's also outside my area of expertise. Best of luck!

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@simonpcouch @AksanBA @stevokeyo @stmcg - Thanks for the replies! I hope that we can work together on a future submission.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@S-canchi @petermacp @stensy @darokun @monicagerber @darrendahly - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? Given your expertise in R, I think that you would make valuable contributions to the review. Here is the link to the package: https://github.com/maize-genetics/rTASSEL. At JOSS, our reviews are driven by checklists.

bioedd commented 2 years ago

Hello. Thanks for the invite! Unfortunately, I won't be able to review as this submission is outside of my area of expertise.

Eduardo Álvarez Editor Asociado - Economía Creativa

Av. Constituyentes 455, Col. América [55] 2789 9000 | centro.edu.mx http://www3.centro.edu.mx/ | @centro_u http://www.instagram.com/centro_u

El vie, 24 jun 2022 a las 13:11, Frederick Boehm @.***>) escribió:

@simonpcouch https://github.com/simonpcouch @flor14 https://github.com/flor14 @bioedd https://github.com/bioedd @stevokeyo https://github.com/stevokeyo @brunomontezano https://github.com/brunomontezano @stmcg https://github.com/stmcg - Would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4499#issuecomment-1165815864, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMYXSAUDECNV7OCQLBFUCVDVQX26ZANCNFSM5ZQK3URQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

--

La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial, restringida y está destinada únicamente para el uso de la(s) persona(s) a la(s) que está dirigido, por lo que se le notifica que está estrictamente prohibida cualquier difusión, distribución o copia del mismo, bajo las responsabilidades legales correspondientes. Si ha recibido este mensaje de correo electrónico por error, debe destruirlo y notificar al remitente por esta misma vía, en un término no mayor a 24 horas. CENTRO DE DISEÑO Y COMUNICACIÓN, S.C. (Centro de diseño, cine y televisión), no acepta ninguna responsabilidad por cambios realizados al contenido de este mensaje durante su envío o posterior a este. Aun cuando CENTRO DE DISEÑO Y COMUNICACIÓN, S.C. (Centro de diseño, cine y televisión), ha revisado contra virus los archivos anexos a este correo electrónico, se recomienda verificarlos antes de abrirlos.

The information contained in this email is confidential, restricted and is intended solely for the use of the person (s) to whom it is addressed, so you are notified that any dissemination is strictly prohibited, distribution or copy thereof, under the corresponding legal responsibilities. If you have received this e-mail message in error, you must destroy it and notify the sender by this same means, within a period not exceeding 24 hours. CENTRO DE DISEÑO Y COMUNICACIÓN, S.C. (Centro de diseño, cine y televisión), does not accept any responsibility for changes made to the content of this message during its delivery or after it. Even when CENTRO DE DISEÑO Y COMUNICACIÓN, S.C. (Centro de diseño, cine y televisión), has reviewed the files attached to this email against viruses, it is recommended to check them before opening them.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the reply, @bioedd . I'll keep you in mind for a future submission.

petermacp commented 2 years ago

Many thanks for asking me to review, but also unfortunately not in an area with which I have expertise.

All the best,

Peter

Dr Peter MacPherson MBChB MPH PhD Wellcome Trust Fellow & Reader in Population Health Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine & Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi

Honorary Professor in Population Health London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Honorary Consultant in Communicable Disease Control UK Health Security Agency

Mob: +265 99 717 6230 Email: @. @.> Website: Website: https://petermacpherson.netlify.app/ https://petermacpherson.netlify.app/

On 28 Jun 2022, at 00:21, Frederick Boehm @.***> wrote:

Thanks for the reply, @bioedd https://github.com/bioedd . I'll keep you in mind for a future submission.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4499#issuecomment-1167981314, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJIU3HTX6N3623E6QSO7V3VRISODANCNFSM5ZQK3URQ. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the reply, @petermacp. I hope that we can work together on a future submission.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@Tgerke @tomsing1 @betteridiot @dsurujon @standage @jmcgonigle @tkchafin - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? I think that your expertise in R and genetics would be real assets in performing the review. At JOSS, our reviews are checklist-driven. Thank you for considering this.

tkchafin commented 2 years ago

HI @fboehm I would be happy to review this, although I am pretty busy for the next couple weeks so it may take a bit longer.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@tkchafin - thank you so much! It's no problem that you're pretty busy for the next couple of weeks. Once I find a second reviewer, we can start the review process. Thanks again!

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot add @tkchafin as reviewer

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

@tkchafin added to the reviewers list!

betteridiot commented 2 years ago

Unfortunately, I am unavailable due to my dissertation defense.

fboehm commented 2 years ago

No problem, @betteridiot . I appreciate the reply. Good luck with the defense!!

flor14 commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the invite. I am willing to review but this is outside of my expertise. Best, Florencia

El vie, 24 jun 2022 a las 12:33, The Open Journals editorial robot (< @.***>) escribió:

👉📄 Download article proof https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.04499/joss.04499/10.21105.joss.04499.pdf 📄 View article proof on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.04499/joss.04499/10.21105.joss.04499.pdf 📄 👈

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4499#issuecomment-1165874098, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHB5G2RPTYFMWTICM7DOF2DVQYEQPANCNFSM5ZQK3URQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

brunomontezano commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the invite. I'm in the same situation as @flor14. I'm open to reviewing the submission but genomics is not my area of expertise.

tomsing1 commented 2 years ago

@fboehm I am happy to review this manuscript!

fboehm commented 2 years ago

Thanks, @flor14, @brunomontezano and @tomsing1! I really appreciate your willingness to review this. I'll assign @tomsing1 as the second reviewer. I hope that I can work with @flor14 and @brunomontezano on a future submission. Thanks again!

fboehm commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot add @tomsing1 as reviewer