Closed editorialbot closed 2 years ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.11 s (481.3 files/s, 219327.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript 13 2424 2495 9164
SVG 1 0 0 2671
Python 10 313 284 1002
CSS 4 190 38 779
Jupyter Notebook 5 0 1029 589
C++ 2 91 112 416
CUDA 1 65 58 381
HTML 1 20 4 218
YAML 3 27 5 177
Markdown 4 79 0 172
TeX 1 11 0 137
C/C++ Header 2 32 50 130
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 11
TOML 1 0 0 7
reStructuredText 1 2 8 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 51 3266 4091 15882
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 639
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_9 may be a valid DOI for title: Geos: Geodesic image segmentation
- 10.1145/1409625.1409626 may be a valid DOI for title: Parallel algorithms for approximation of distance maps on parametric surfaces
- 10.1016/0167-8655(96)00010-4 may be a valid DOI for title: New geodosic distance transforms for gray-scale images
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@masadcv thanks for this JOSS submission. I am the AEiC on call this week and here to help process the initial steps for this work. Before we proceed, can you check the following:
@editorialbot generate pdf
here to update the paper and use @editorialbot check references
to check the DOIs again. Thanks@editorialbot invite @vissarion as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot assign @vissarion as editor
Assigned! @vissarion is now the editor
Hi @bencardoen, @kris-rowe, @yhtang, @jacobmerson, @yuhc would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?
We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_9 is OK
- 10.1145/1409625.1409626 is OK
- 10.1016/0167-8655(96)00010-4 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, Many thanks for starting the review thread. I have fixed the missing DOI and regenerated the paper. Looking forward!
Hi @vissarion, I'd be happy to review this submission.
@editorialbot add @yhtang as reviewer
@yhtang added to the reviewers list!
@vissarion very recently I agreed to review another paper, so I will sit this one out unless it is not possible to find a second reviewer
@vissarion I can review this paper
@vissarion I'll have no internet access for the next 10 days. I can help if more reviewers are needed at that time.
@vissarion I can review but only starting in ~ 2 weeks due to health issues, if you need review sooner than that, then I'm afraid I'm unable to help.
@editorialbot add @jacobmerson as reviewer
@jacobmerson added to the reviewers list!
@bencardoen ~ 2 weeks is OK I would like to add you as a 3rd reviewer if you agree
@vissarion sure, sounds good :+1:
@editorialbot add @bencardoen as reviewer
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot add @bencardoen as reviewer
@bencardoen added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4532.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@masadcv<!--end-author-handle-- (Muhammad Asad) Repository: https://github.com/masadcv/FastGeodis Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0rc4 Editor: !--editor-->@vissarion<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @yhtang, @jacobmerson, @bencardoen Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @masadcv. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@masadcv if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: