[PRE REVIEW]: SpectroMap: Peak detection algorithm for audio fingerprinting

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Aaron-AALG<!--end-author-handle-- (Aarón López-García) Repository: https://github.com/Aaron-AALG/spectromap Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v0.1.1 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0d399fae3c796e6a15a8661f4dcc28c6"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0d399fae3c796e6a15a8661f4dcc28c6/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0d399fae3c796e6a15a8661f4dcc28c6/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0d399fae3c796e6a15a8661f4dcc28c6)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Aaron-AALG. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Aaron-AALG if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: https://github.com/Aaron-AALG/spectromap/blob/main/paper/paper.md

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: https://github.com/Aaron-AALG/spectromap/blob/main/paper/paper.md

[editorialbot]

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot set main as branch

[editorialbot]

Done! branch is now main

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.3390/s18010160 is OK
- 10.1007/s11265-005-4151-3 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-031-07015-0_16 may be a valid DOI for title: A Proposal to Compare the Similarity Between Musical Products. One More Step for Automated Plagiarism Detection?

INVALID DOIs

- None

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.02 s (431.4 files/s, 31429.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                         2             56              0            134
Python                           3             30             87             86
TeX                              1              3              0             50
reStructuredText                 1             24             21             19
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             7            113            108            289
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1186

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[danielskatz]

👋 @Aaron-AALG - I'm sorry to say that this submission does not meet the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages for other suggestions for how you might receive credit for your work.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.