search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
722 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators #4551

Closed editorialbot closed 2 years ago

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@bluefoxr<!--end-author-handle-- (William Becker) Repository: https://github.com/bluefoxr/COINr Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@jbytecode<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @bauer-alex, @paulrougieux Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/187b1759658c96177f8d17f3b55b90a0"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/187b1759658c96177f8d17f3b55b90a0/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/187b1759658c96177f8d17f3b55b90a0/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/187b1759658c96177f8d17f3b55b90a0)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @bluefoxr. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@bluefoxr if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 2 years ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.50 s (605.0 files/s, 187080.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                           209           7304            750          34654
JavaScript                      10           6039           5400          20673
R                               46           2017           5888           4978
XML                              1              0              0            630
Rmd                             20           1106           1737            590
CSS                              5             98             52            464
YAML                             3             12              4            312
TeX                              1             32              0            287
Markdown                         5             84              0            264
SVG                              1              0              1             11
JSON                             1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           302          16692          13832          62864
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1049

editorialbot commented 2 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.056 may be a valid DOI for title: Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap
- 10.1016/j.indic.2020.100075 may be a valid DOI for title: Wrapping up the Europe 2020 strategy: A multidimensional indicator analysis
- 10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100045 may be a valid DOI for title: Exploring the link between Asia and Europe connectivity and sustainable development
- 10.1007/s10669-020-09784-x may be a valid DOI for title: MCDA Index Tool: an interactive software to develop indices and rankings
- 10.1016/j.omega.2017.04.007 may be a valid DOI for title: Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: a methodological proposal
- 10.4135/9781412961288.n54 may be a valid DOI for title: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
- 10.1007/s11205-016-1263-z may be a valid DOI for title: Highlighting methodological limitations in the steps of composite indicators construction
- 10.1007/s11573-018-0902-z may be a valid DOI for title: Building composite indicators using multicriteria methods: A review
- 10.2139/ssrn.3483420 may be a valid DOI for title: Corporate income taxation in the digital age: Africa in the Corporate Tax Haven Index 2019
- 10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9 may be a valid DOI for title: On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness
- 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105208 may be a valid DOI for title: A framework based on statistical analysis and stakeholders’ preferences to inform weighting in composite indicators
- 10.1111/j.1467-985x.2005.00350.x may be a valid DOI for title: Uncertainty and Sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators
- 10.3389/frwa.2022.825854 may be a valid DOI for title: The Water-Energy-Food Nexus Index: A Tool to Support Integrated Resource Planning, Management and Security
- 10.1016/s0378-4754(00)00270-6 may be a valid DOI for title: Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates
- 10.1007/s11205-021-02688-6 may be a valid DOI for title: Composite indicators to measure quality of working life in Europe: a systematic review
- 10.1002/sd.1723 may be a valid DOI for title: The Water Retention Index: Using land use planning to manage water resources in Europe
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0193762 may be a valid DOI for title: Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

danielskatz commented 2 years ago

👋 @bluefoxr - Thanks for your submission. While we find an editor for it, you could work on the possibly missing DOIs that editorialbot suggests, but note that some may be incorrect. Please feel free to make changes to your .bib file, then use the command @editorialbot check references to check again, and the command @editorialbot generate pdf when the references are right to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.

danielskatz commented 2 years ago

👋 @jbytecode - would you be able to edit this submission?

danielskatz commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot invite @jbytecode as editor

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

bluefoxr commented 2 years ago

@danielskatz thanks for looking at this - I will add the missing DOIs to the references. Some of these are not actually used in the paper so I will delete those from paper.bib

bluefoxr commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 2 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100045 is OK
- 10.13140/RG.2.2.14408.75520 is OK
- 10.1007/s10669-020-09784-x is OK
- 10.2760/523877 is OK
- 10.1016/j.omega.2017.04.007 is OK
- 10.1007/s11573-018-0902-z is OK
- 10.1111/ecge.12094 is OK
- 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105208 is OK
- 10.1007/s11205-021-02688-6 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
bluefoxr commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

bluefoxr commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Hello @bluefoxr, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
jbytecode commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

@danielskatz of course, gladly

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Assigned! @jbytecode is now the editor

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

@bluefoxr - thank you for the submission. I am the handling editor. do you have suggestions for potential reviewers?

You can also use the list https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PAPRJ63yq9aPC1COLjaQp8mHmEq3rZUzwUYxTulyu78/edit#gid=856801822 for potential reviewers that are registered before.

Please start your search from the very bottom of the list.

Please mention their usernames without using the @ character (just because we don't want to bother them).

thank you in advance.

bluefoxr commented 2 years ago

Hi, I have looked over the list of reviewers. The package is especially relevant to policy, macroeconomics and social science so possible reviewers could be: mariacuellar, alletsee, bradweiner, lebebr01, fartist, chrisaberson

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

👋👋👋 Dear @mariacuellar 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

👋👋👋 Dear @bradweiner 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

mariacuellar commented 2 years ago

No, I am unable to review this.

Best of luck,

On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 12:59 PM The Open Journals editorial robot < @.***> wrote:

👉📄 Download article proof https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.04551/joss.04551/10.21105.joss.04551.pdf 📄 View article proof on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.04551/joss.04551/10.21105.joss.04551.pdf 📄 👈

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551#issuecomment-1176459646, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGK2KUVP34OMXIRLCTDKJ3VSW3QXANCNFSM52ZQ54QQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

@mariacuellar - thank you for the quick response.

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

👋👋👋 Dear @lebebr01 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

👋👋👋 Dear @fartist 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

👋👋👋 Dear @chrisaberson 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

@bluefoxr - do you have more suggestions for potential reviewers?

bluefoxr commented 2 years ago

@jbytecode I could suggest "paulrougieux" (not registered at JOSS I think but well familiar with R). I'll try to think of some others

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

👋👋👋 Dear @paulrougieux 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

👋👋👋 Dear @biju9bjs 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

👋👋👋 Dear @simonpcouch 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

chrisaberson commented 2 years ago

I won't be able to do this one - am scheduled to leave for a trip

fartist commented 2 years ago

Me neither - have a move scheduled coming up, sorry.

Best,

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:22 AM chrisaberson @.***> wrote:

I won't be able to do this one - am scheduled to leave for a trip

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551#issuecomment-1183486304, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADMVHB45JNBBHVZ73BFSOO3VT33MZANCNFSM52ZQ54QQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

simonpcouch commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the holler, @jbytecode! I'll be unable to review this one. Best of luck!

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

👋👋👋 Dear @PhilipPallmann 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

👋👋👋 Dear @bauer-alex 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4551).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

bradweiner commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the invite. I am terribly sorry but I just got a new position and simply do not have the capacity to take this on at this time. Best wishes and be sure to keep me on the list!

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

@bradweiner - good luck with your new position. By the way, I've never had such a hard time finding a reviewer :)

bauer-alex commented 2 years ago

Hi @jbytecode, I can help with reviewing the submission. :+1:

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot add @bauer-alex as reviewer

@bauer-alex - thank you for accepting our invitation. The review will start after finding a second reviewer in a new thread.

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

@bauer-alex added to the reviewers list!

paulrougieux commented 2 years ago

@jbytecode travelling, I don't have good connectivity at the moment, but I'm available for the review in case you didn't find someone else already.

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

@paulrougieux - thank you for the response. it is not too much urgent, when will you plan to be available?

paulrougieux commented 2 years ago

I'll be available the week after next.

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot add @paulrougieux as reviewer

@paulrougieux - that is acceptable.

whenever I start the review, a new thread will be created automatically. I will introduce the instructions in there.

thank you.

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

@paulrougieux added to the reviewers list!

jbytecode commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot start review