[PRE REVIEW]: ur-scape: harnessing data for stakeholder participation in city-making processes

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@luyuhao0326<!--end-author-handle-- (Yuhao Lu) Repository: https://github.com/UrbanRuralSystems/ur-scape Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v0.9.96 Editor: !--editor-->@hugoledoux<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @winstonyym, @cforgaci Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a26d6189208eb13b4f406922ee875891"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a26d6189208eb13b4f406922ee875891/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a26d6189208eb13b4f406922ee875891/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a26d6189208eb13b4f406922ee875891)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @luyuhao0326. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @danielskatz.

@luyuhao0326 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: https://github.com/UrbanRuralSystems/ur-scape/tree/paper/Paper

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: https://github.com/UrbanRuralSystems/ur-scape/tree/paper/Paper

[editorialbot]

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: https://github.com/UrbanRuralSystems/ur-scape/tree/paper/Paper

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot set paper as branch

[editorialbot]

Done! branch is now paper

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=1.24 s (605.9 files/s, 238203.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unity-Prefab                   207             24              0         154338
C#                             502          17826          23491          88823
Python                           5            575            501           5095
Qt                               1              0              0           1839
HLSL                            22            349            233           1775
JSON                             3              0              0            363
TeX                              1             32              0            173
Markdown                         4             80              0            140
Visual Basic                     1             28             12            103
JavaScript                       1             15              1             71
XML                              1              0              0             46
Objective-C                      1             10              0             37
YAML                             1              1              4             18
HTML                             1              0              0             17
CSS                              1              0              0              8
DOS Batch                        1              2              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           753          18942          24242         252852
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1197

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101825 may be a valid DOI for title: Free and open source urbanism: Software for urban planning practice
- 10.1057/udi.2010.25 may be a valid DOI for title: Geographic information system: Old principles with new capabilities
- 10.1038/467912a may be a valid DOI for title: A unified theory of urban living
- 10.3390/ijgi9010049 may be a valid DOI for title: Strengthening Participation Using Interactive Planning Support Systems: A Systematic Review
- 10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8_1 may be a valid DOI for title: Introduction to ‘planning support systems and smart cities’
- 10.1111/1475-5661.00062 may be a valid DOI for title: Spaces of labour control: Comparative perspectives from Southeast Asia
- 10.1038/sdata.2017.1 may be a valid DOI for title: High Resolution Global Gridded Data for Use in Population Studies
- 10.1007/978-3-319-08299-8_21 may be a valid DOI for title: Geodesign in Practice: What about the urban designers
- 10.2104/ag060022 may be a valid DOI for title: Geographical visualization: A participatory planning support tool for imagining landscape futures
- 10.1177/08854122211068526 may be a valid DOI for title: Semantic City Planning Systems (SCPS): A Literature Review
- 10.1080/18626033.2012.749602 may be a valid DOI for title: A framework for geodesign: Changing geography by design
- 10.1038/sdata.2017.4 may be a valid DOI for title: WorldPop, Open Data for Spatial Demography

INVALID DOIs

- None

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[luyuhao0326]

suggested reviewer (from the bottom of the given list): zfergus, jhwohlgemuth, and MOHSEN.MOJRI@GMAIL.COM (no username was found in the sheet).

[arfon]

@editorialbot invite @pdebuyl as editor

:wave: @pdebuyl – I realize this submission is a little distant from 'remote sensing' but I wondered if you'd be willing to take it on for us?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[pdebuyl]

Hi @arfon . I could, but not before mid-august. Seems a bit more GIS than what I do though.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @hugoledoux as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@hugoledoux can you please help edit this submission if you feel it is a reasonable fit? Thanks

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot assign @hugoledoux as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @hugoledoux is now the editor

[hugoledoux]

@winstonyym as the author of a very recent survey about open-source software for urban planning, I think you would be perfect for this review. Do you agree to do this, time frame is a first pass on the code/docs/paper within about 1mo

[winstonyym]

@hugoledoux thank you for the great opportunity and it is an honour to connect. Sorry for the late reply, I was overseas. I agree to undertake this review and note the timeline (starting from your message). In the meantime, I will consult https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html.

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot add @winstonyym as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@winstonyym added to the reviewers list!

[hugoledoux]

@winstonyym thanks. The review will be done in another github issue, which will be open as soon as the second reviewer has accepted.

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot add @cforgaci as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@cforgaci added to the reviewers list!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4664.