[PRE REVIEW]: Pyripherals: A Python Package for Communicating with Peripheral Electronic Devices

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Ajstros<!--end-author-handle-- (Abraham Stroschein) Repository: https://github.com/Ajstros/pyripherals Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.0.2 Editor: !--editor-->@danielskatz<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @untzag, @askuric Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/35fd570e4d8132210476bbaf747ca5d7"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/35fd570e4d8132210476bbaf747ca5d7/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/35fd570e4d8132210476bbaf747ca5d7/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/35fd570e4d8132210476bbaf747ca5d7)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Ajstros. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Ajstros if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.14 s (656.5 files/s, 225174.5 lines/s)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                         files          blank        comment           code
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                          14           2405           2473           9223
HTML                                22           2952             66           6383
Python                              27            982           1588           2849
TeX                                  2             63             14            297
Coq                                  1             40              0            257
reStructuredText                    10            207             88            233
Markdown                             7             80              0            202
YAML                                 2              6             18             31
DOS Batch                            1              8              1             26
TOML                                 1              1              0              9
make                                 1              4              7              9
Verilog-SystemVerilog                1              0              0              4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                                89           6748           4255          19523
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1140

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1145/2851581.2890266 may be a valid DOI for title: FrontPanel®

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[Ajstros]

Suggested Potential Reviewers:

• ixjlyons
• sptennak
• chekoduadarsh
• sneakers-the-rat
• askuric

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@Ajstros thanks for this submission to JOSS, I am an AEiC and am checking if this submission is in scope, and if so will help search for a handling editor. I have browsed through your paper and the repository readme. Would you be able to amend your statement of need section such that it also clearly sketches out the research application of this software? You can also cite typical works in this domain, and cite works that already use the software if any. You can call @editorialbot generate pdf here to update the draft paper.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@Ajstros it looks like most editors in this domain are currently handling other submission. I have therefore waitlisted this submission for the moment. We will assign an editor when one becomes available.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@jarvist would this work be too far off topic for you to handle as editor?

[jarvist]

A bit too far away I'm afraid; sounds like more of a job for an electrical engineer, or at least an expt physicist who does a lot of hardware interaction.

[lucask07]

We should also add untzag to the list of potential reviewers. He has done extensive instrumentation work.

[Ajstros]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[Ajstros]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Thank you for your help on this submission and for your feedback on the paper. We have updated the statement of need section of the paper to add the information you mentioned.

[danielskatz]

👋 @adi3 - would you be able to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @adi3 as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[danielskatz]

👋 @adi3 - this is the other paper you were invited to edit. If you can take it too, please do. If not, please let me know.

[Ajstros]

@danielskatz Is there anything we can do while we wait for an editor to become available?

[danielskatz]

no, sorry.

[danielskatz]

@Ajstros - given the wait, I'll go ahead and edit this submission.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @danielskatz is now the editor

[danielskatz]

👋 @untzag - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

[danielskatz]

👋 @ixjlyons - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

[danielskatz]

👋 @sptennak - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

[danielskatz]

👋 @chekoduadarsh - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

[danielskatz]

👋 @sneakers-the-rat - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

[danielskatz]

👋 @askuric - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

[untzag]

@danielskatz you bet, please mark me as a reviewer

[danielskatz]

Thanks @untzag - I'll add you, and once we get a second reviewer as well, we'll start the review

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot add @untzag as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@untzag added to the reviewers list!

[askuric]

Hi everyone, I'd be happy to review this paper/repo but due to some work constraints I would not be able to start before the 25th of September. If that is fine with your schedule don't hesitate to let me know.

[danielskatz]

@askuric - that's fine. I'll add you, and start the review now, but will add a note there that you will be delayed in starting until 25 Sept. Thanks!!

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot add @askuric as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@askuric added to the reviewers list!

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4762.

[askuric]

OK perfect thanks, I'm looking forward to it.